It's not a dumb move to not offer a hybrid Venza. Toyota doesn't sell nearly enough Venza's to warrant hybridizing it, at least now. Rav4 is still the #3 seller for Toyota, so hybrid makes sense.
No hybrid. That was essentially the first question the media had when Toyota launched the Venza in 2009. They said they would watch the market and determine. I love the design of the Venza (inside and out) and would take a hybrid version (though you'd have to pry my Prius from my hands first!). A Venza hybrid would also be redundant in my household since we do have the Prius unless more space is needed. I wonder what's the point of the Highlander now that we have the Venza aside from the availability of a 3rd row. No but I don't see why they would only offer a 2WD version (esp. if they want to sell it up here. Most of our SUVs are only offered in AWD/4WD. Only within the last 2 years have we seen FWD versions of the CR-V and RAV4 popping up. I guess the Escape was available in FWD for a few years too. They don't sell but it's nice to advertise a lower starting price, esp. if people are accustomed to see the base price with 4WD. It is a midsize.
Yes for us. We went to the dealer to buy a 2011 G3 Prius and walked out with a deposit on a 2012 v. The v was parked next to it and even though logically, the G3 was a better fit (cheaper, better APR due to incentives on 11s, better MPGs, only 2 of us in the family and we have a fullsized diesel pickup and a diesel mini SUV), my wife liked the v enough to get it. If the v wasnt on the lot when we went to get the G3, we would have drove away in a 2011 G3. I had an 08 G2 and it was a great car for 100k miles but I found it slightly uncomfortable (6'4") and wanted a more upright seating position. With 2 accidents in the G2, I also wanted something bigger for safety. The Jeep Liberty CRD gets me that with ~30mpg, so I can understand why my wife preferred the bigger Prius at the cost of MPGs.