1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Tire Upgrade

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Accessories & Modifications' started by nyprius, Jun 26, 2006.

  1. NuShrike

    NuShrike Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    1,378
    7
    0
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Three60guy @ Jun 28 2006, 11:19 AM) [snapback]278138[/snapback]</div>
    This is the exact example of comparing tires across classes using subjective opinions when the variety and number of tires the reviewer has actually experienced and tested is unknown.

    Our example: conservative drivers would rate the Prius handling a 7-8 versus a performance driver's 4-5 due to the difference in experience and demand. A conservative driver's harsh and noisy, is a performance driver's responsive and quiet feedback.

    The only accurate rating system is head-to-head testing by the same person (with instrumentation if possible), although TireRack's "surveys" could be still used to hint of what overall the tire performance is.
     
  2. grasshopper

    grasshopper Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    425
    2
    0
    Location:
    Myrtle Beach SC
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Three60guy @ Jun 28 2006, 02:19 PM) [snapback]278138[/snapback]</div>

    Thanks! This is what i've been looking for.
     
  3. Three60guy

    Three60guy -->All around guy<-- (360 = round) get it?

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    918
    16
    0
    Location:
    Racine, Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Advanced
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NuShrike @ Jun 28 2006, 02:06 PM) [snapback]278159[/snapback]</div>
    I am not in disagreement with you. However, good luck finding what you are looking for. I offered this spreadsheet as the best I could find. Nothing else. Given that ANY opinions on this subject are subjective even if it is only one person doing the ratings one could argue that such a system would also be imperfect. Alas we all live in an inperfect world. At least someone here on PriusChat went to the trouble of gathering all of the data and put it in one place. I thought that was awesome.

    If you find what you are looking for I will be the first to congratulate you. I hope you do. Until then I hope the spreadsheet narrows down some of the variables.

    Cheers
     
  4. Rogust

    Rogust New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    28
    0
    0
    [When I looked on PC for tire recommendations, many tires were suggested, but three seemed to be recommended the most – Michelin Hydroedge (HE), Goodyear Comfortred (CT) and Goodyear Tripletred (TT). The TT was rated the best all season passenger car tire by Consumer Reports and Tirerack.

    Just a note:
    On my former car, I put about 65,000 miles on a set of HE, and I loved them. Rain/Snow/Dry: all were handled exceptionally...never hydroplaned once even on rutted flooded highways. They still looked good when I traded it. I'll probably buy a set when my Prius comes in.
     
  5. ken1784

    ken1784 SuperMID designer

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    2,943
    1,378
    67
    Location:
    Yokohama, JAPAN
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nyprius @ Jun 28 2006, 10:02 PM) [snapback]277983[/snapback]</div>
    We have four packages in Japan.
    Code:
    package              tire size  10-15 mode test
    ===================  =========  ===============
    S                    185/65R15      35.5 km/L
    G                    185/65R15      33.0 km/L
    S Touring Selection  195/55R16      30.0 km/L
    G Touring Selection  195/55R16      30.0 km/L
    
    What do you mean the better tires?

    My Prius is "G Touring Selection" and I replaced tires with 185/65R15.
    They are comfortable, silent, smooth, light, better mileage and etc.
    For me, the 185 tires are better than 195.

    Also, what do you mean the rear disc brakes are better?
    My feeling is the rear drum brake is light, inexpensive, simple, enough brake power and etc.
    For me, the rear drum brake is better than disc for Prius.

    Ken@Japan
     
  6. ken1784

    ken1784 SuperMID designer

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    2,943
    1,378
    67
    Location:
    Yokohama, JAPAN
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
  7. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Three60guy @ Jun 28 2006, 02:19 PM) [snapback]278138[/snapback]</div>
    This analysis looks great but it doesn't include the TT, probably because it was only looking at 185/65R15 tires. A good 185/65 works well on the Prius, as many have said. All else being equal, 195s look and perform better though.
     
  8. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NuShrike @ Jun 28 2006, 03:06 PM) [snapback]278159[/snapback]</div>
    That's why I give the most weight to the Consumer Report's ratings. While the CR tests may not be perfect, they come the closest that I'm aware of to the testing conditions you suggest.

    Also, I think it means a lot when the overwhelming majority of reviews give a tire an excellent rating. While these may be biased and flawed as you suggest, a bad tire would not get consistently good reviews. I am not aware of any tire that gets reviews that are as consistently good at the TT. If someone knows of one, please point it out.
     
  9. theorist

    theorist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    365
    11
    0
    Location:
    Lexington, MA
    Tests are rarely done between classes of tires. Heres the closest I could find to a test comparing a highly rated all-season passenger tire with all-season performance tires.

    Here's a test comparing a Hydroedge with an Goodyear Eagle RS-A:
    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/pass_tires_wet_c.jsp

    Here's a similar test comparing performance tires available in our size (including the BF Goodring Tration TA (H series), Bridgestone RE950 (discontinued - being replacend by the RE960AS), and the Dunlop SP Sport A2 (discontinued - replaced by the A2 Plus)) with the same Goodyear RS-A:
    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/traction_advantage_c.jsp

    In the past, Consumer Reports tested some tires against multiple classes facilitating cross class comparisons. For instance, they tested the Michelin Energy MXV4 against performance tires and touring tires. I wonder what tire class they'll test this November.
     
  10. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ken1784 @ Jun 28 2006, 08:17 PM) [snapback]278318[/snapback]</div>
    Ken, I don't know if all season tires are required in the US. But I do know if you live in a place like New England, you'd be well advised to have them, or have separate winter tires. Cheers, Frank
     
  11. theorist

    theorist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    365
    11
    0
    Location:
    Lexington, MA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nyprius @ Jun 28 2006, 09:06 PM) [snapback]278343[/snapback]</div>
    ... , reduced vehicle emissions, better hydroplaning resistance, arguably improved snow traction, lower cost, and softer ride if comparing a 185/65r15 with a 195/55r16.
     
  12. theorist

    theorist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    365
    11
    0
    Location:
    Lexington, MA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ken1784 @ Jun 28 2006, 08:17 PM) [snapback]278318[/snapback]</div>
    Some new performance cars are sold with only summer tires in the US.

    These include the Civic Si, Mazdaspeed Mazda6 and Mx-5, Audi RS4, Ford Focus SVT, BMW M3, M5, and M convertible.
     
  13. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(theorist @ Jun 28 2006, 09:18 PM) [snapback]278359[/snapback]</div>
    Good points. I agree on the hydroplaning and cost, though cost is about $5 difference. On snow, it depends on conditions. If it's packed snow that you can't break through or ice, the wider tire grips better. Re softer, compared to a similar height tire (195/60 or 195/65), the wider tire is probably softer and more comfortable. The minimal hydroplane edge of a 185 must be balanced against better cornering on dry, wet and snow of a 195. Also, to help decide whether narrow or wide tires are better, consider what types of tires are put on expensive, better handling cars. Are they narrow or wide?
     
  14. usbseawolf2000

    usbseawolf2000 HSD PhD

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    14,487
    3,000
    0
    Location:
    Fort Lee, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(theorist @ Jun 28 2006, 09:18 PM) [snapback]278359[/snapback]</div>
    Let's talk about cost. 185mm tire is less expensive than 195mm. Ok, but you are getting more rubber to hold the car weight. Would 195mm or 205mm tire last longer (provided, the same material)? If wider tire last longer, the cost could be a wash. Just a thought.

    Dennis
     
  15. theorist

    theorist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    365
    11
    0
    Location:
    Lexington, MA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nyprius @ Jun 28 2006, 09:43 PM) [snapback]278384[/snapback]</div>
    I thought you and Ken were comparing size 185/65-15 with 195/55-16, which have limited choices and high prices in the US.

    BTW, I switched to Continental ContiProContacts in a size 195/65-15 two weeks ago.

    Comparing these with the Dunlop SP Sport A2 Plus tires size 185/65-15 that I was using, the larger, softer ContiProContacts are:
    lighter
    providing better fuel efficiency
    worse handling, especially steering response
    giving more accurate odometer and speedometer readings (according to GPS and highway marker comparisons)
    smoother riding at equal pressures

    I believe this shows the importance of tire design. The Dunlop SP Sport A2 Plus has a _much_ firmer sidewall and a thick continuous center rib in the tread. The ContiProContact sidewall is flimsy in this size (which weighs less than the ContiProContact in the smaller 185/65-15 size. :huh: )

    I switched to the ContiProContact largely based on cars that use it including the VW Golf and Jetta TDI in this size and the VW GTI, Audi A4, A6, some BMWs, Jaguars, and Mercedes in other sizes. Still, I miss the superior handling and tracking of the smaller but firmer Dunlop SP Sport A2 Plus tires.

    The no-no 195/65-15 :eek: size has improved my speedometer and odometer accuracy and has not caused any rubbing anywhere in the wheel wells.
     
  16. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(theorist @ Jun 28 2006, 10:35 PM) [snapback]278405[/snapback]</div>
    The ContiProContact sounds like a good all around tire! Tirerack shows above average ratings. No warranty though. It's interesting that the 195/65 weights 1.7 lbs less than the 185/65. Seems it would weigh more. The increased speedo/odo accuracy makes sense. Many on PC have said the Prius speedo over-reads by 2 mph or more. Your tire has 829 RPM (3% less than the US OEM 185/65). This would cause under-read, cancel the over-read and bring you to right about accurate speedo readings. You also get slightly more ground clearance. I was looking at the 195/60 and 205/60 because the RPMs are closer to the OEM 855. Sounds like 195/65 is a good option too.
     
  17. NuShrike

    NuShrike Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    1,378
    7
    0
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(theorist @ Jun 28 2006, 06:11 PM) [snapback]278353[/snapback]</div>
    So, from your links let's make up a test of the Goodyear Eagle RS-A vs Michelin HydroEdge vs Dunlop SP Sport A2.
    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/pass_tires_wet_c.jsp
    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/traction_advantage_c.jsp

    I'm going to use the individual performance drive data since the overall numbers don't make sense in HE vs SP2.

    columns: RSA, HE, SP2 __(winner)

    Dry Track (higher):
    cornering stability: 6.08 6.05 6.18 __(sp2)
    steering response: 5.94 6.25 6.36 __(sp2)
    braking modulation: 5.87 6.38 6.47 __(sp2)
    handling predictability: 5.77 6.29 6.24 __(he)
    overall: 5.92 6.29 6.31 __(sp2)

    Wet Track (higher):
    cornering stability: 6.23 6.02 6.19 __(rsa, sp2, he)
    steering response: 6.11 6.01 6.29 __(sp2)
    braking modulation: 5.96 5.91 6.38 __(sp2)
    handling predictability: 5.98 5.96 6.13 __(sp2)
    overall: 6.07 5.98 6.25 __(sp2)

    Braking Distance (lower):
    dry: 96.6/98.7 93.8 91.9:(normalized to RSA's first 96.6 feet, this should be 89.8) __(sp2)
    wet: 105.2/107.2 105.0 100.0:(normalized -> 98) __(sp2)

    Average Cornering (higher):
    dry: 0.89/0.92 0.90 0.93:(normalized -> 0.90) __(he/sp2)
    wet: 0.77 0.73 0.76 __(rsa, sp2, he) Hydroedge is horrible in wet cornering?

    "Under wet conditions, the Eagle RS-A posted the highest level of cornering traction (Average Lateral G's) and the fastest average lap time of the group. Not a surprise, considering even an average performer in High Performance All-Season category handles better than tires from a lower performance level category."

    Varying times (drivers?) make slalom and lap time comparisons difficult.
    but... :
    Slalom Time (lower):
    dry: 4.30/4.25 4.32 4.27:(normalized -> 4.32) __(rsa, he/sp2)
    wet: 4.81/4.72 4.75 4.74:(normalized -> 4.77) __(he)

    Lap Time (lower)
    dry: 30.98/30.71 30.80 30.63:(normalized -> 30.90) __(he)
    wet: 33.69/33.62 33.73 33.42:(normalized -> 33.49) __(sp2)

    So, the overall winner here is Dunlop SP2 sometimes by a wide margin especially in wet. The hydroedge seems to outperform sometimes however in dry and the wet slalom.

    Now compared to the survey results:
    HE:
    hydroplaning: 9.4; wet traction: 9.3; cornering stability 8.8; dry traction: 9.2; steering response: 8.9
    SP2 Plus:
    hydroplaning: 8.0; wet traction: 8.0; cornering stability 8.2; dry traction: 8.5; steering response: 8.2
    GY ComforTred:
    hydroplaning: 8.6; wet traction: 8.7; cornering stability 8.2; dry traction: 8.9; steering response: 8.1
    GY TripleTred:
    hydroplaning: 9.3; wet traction: 9.3; cornering stability 9.0; dry traction: 9.4; steering response: 9.0

    SP2 outperformed HE in cornering stability, steering response, dry & wet traction (using the braking distance numbers).

    You can see the survey results using the "I feel" instrumentation is bogus and almost useless for accurate comparisons.
     
  18. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ken1784 @ Jun 28 2006, 07:58 PM) [snapback]278306[/snapback]</div>


    Ken, Thanks for the info on Japan models. I heard that 195 was the base model tire in Japan. Clearly it's not.

    Regarding comparisons between 195 and 185 tires as well as disk and drum brakes, that can be a matter of personal opinion and preference. In these areas, I tried to base my decision on as much expert information as I could get. One way to tell if wider tires and disk brakes are better is to look at high end cars. Mercedes, Porshe, BWM, Lexus and others all have wide tires and disk brakes. I assume that's because wide tires not only look sportier but hold the road much better.

    Also, I know from driving big old V8 cars in the 1970's that disk brakes are WAY more effective at stopping a car than drum brakes. For example, in 1978, I was driving cross country in a 1970 Lemans Sport with a 350 V8. Going down a long winding mountain pass in Colorado, my drum brakes heated up and I couldn't stop the car! I had to skid sideways into a dirt parking area to avoid going off a cliff. Also, along with my Prius, I own a Yamaha FZ1 motorcycle that will do about 170 mph. It has duel disk brakes on the front and a single disk on the back. Why does it have disk instead of drum brakes? Because disk brakes are far better at stopping the bike.

    I think the only advantage a 185 tire might have over a 195 is fuel economy. But feedback from many using a 195 on the Prius is that they get the same or nearly the same mileage. I'm getting better mileage so far with a 195/60R15 TT. Even if I lost 1-2 mpg, that's a price I'd pay to have better safety, performance and looks. All the best, Frank
     
  19. finman

    finman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    1,287
    111
    0
    Location:
    Albany, OR
    Vehicle:
    2014 Nissan LEAF
    Most of the effective braking in the Prius happens in the electric motor, no? Then the discs up front assist in stopping most of the cars weight at lower speeds (read somewhere front brakes do 70-80% of the stopping in 'other'cars). Then the rears even it all out. Seems the rears are the least used, least critical stopping issue, so lower cost drums make sense for this type/size of car. They would not add alot to the overall stopping of the Prius, just to evenly bring the car to a stop.

    A larger faster car is another story...

    Cheers,

    Curt.
     
  20. nyprius

    nyprius Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    385
    24
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(finman @ Jun 29 2006, 10:02 AM) [snapback]278547[/snapback]</div>
    The Prius weights nearly 3,000 pounds and goes over 100 mph. The motor has little impact during emergency braking. If rear disk brakes don't add value, why are they on the European Prius and essentially all higher end cars. Clearly they do enhance stopping performance. The trade off is cost, though for a company of Toyota's scale, I bet the incremental cost of rear disk brakes is low. I would have gladly paid a little extra for rear disk brakes if I had the option.