SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19)

Although I have respect for Chinese skills, this is unlikely to be what I’d expect to find in Wuhan (so?):

1. Our anti-Wuhan advocates - might as well be surrender monkeys as they claim a loss to an unskilled lab.
   
2. Complete surrender - to the USA CDC and FDA for imaginary claims by liars.

Regardless of which hypothesis holds most water, the anti-vaxx and anti-mask liars remain noisy but useless content posters.

Bob Wilson

 

Didn't the U.S. have some institutional oversight, or at least cooperation along with shared emerging disease surveillance, at the lab in question and very many others around the world, until about 3 years ago?

 

lol. if only the trans gender studies had the respect they so obviously deserve, racism would go away.

lmao

 

What do people think of this new finding, a connection between mRNA inoculations and downregulation of Type I interferon?

Video: Stephanie Seneff PhD - How the Covid shots suppress your immune system

The preprint article: https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas

If this is true, then what will be the future of the vaccinated population?

 

Too bad they didn't also compare the response of the J&J vaccine.

 

Based on her history, I won't get worried yet. She was previously blaming glyphosate (Roundup) for causing Covid-19.

 

For a research or review paper, there was very little, maybe no, discussion of how likely the negative observations were, or by how much they differed from the normal.

 

Mourning the unvaccinated dead.

Bob Wilson

 

https://covid-101.org/science/how-many-people-have-died-from-the-vaccine-in-the-u-s/

.... and the vaccinated dead .....

and WHO in their right mind (ie; fear) would take an injection if it's not even known if it helps

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions | FDA.

 

If I am infected with something, but are asymptomatic, how would I even know I am infected? Why would I care about being infected if I don't know?

It could troubling for public health. If I was also infectious, but I may not be. Not hacking up my lungs does mean I am spreading less germs into the immediate environment.

We do know in the case of COVID that being vaccinated does protect against infection, and reduces the severity of the disease if one does get infected. If the vaccine results in more asymptomatic and infectious people to potentially cross paths with. Isn't that another reason to get the vaccine for yourself?

 

i saw 3 deaths from the vaccine in the link, did i miss something?

 

Yes

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/24/fact-check-medicare-hospitals-paid-more-covid-19-patients-coronavirus/3000638001/

In other words that's the only deaths the corporate machine admit to. Example: you get a blood clot that goes to the brain, a day & ½ later while driving - fatal accident .... covid? Nope.
.

 

I followed that up in the later post. I only skimmed it, but every statement of the mRNA vaccine's possible negative gave no context of how meaningful the impact could be without the reader then going to the sited source. It raises the lying by omission flag.

 

Here are some findings helping to identify which patients are mostly likely to develop "long covid". Four items appear to be well associated, though the article also mentions several additional factors with weaker links. Caution though, these findings are still exploratory and need to be verified by considerably more research.

New research hints at 4 factors that may increase chances of long COVID

 

That doesn't at all suggest that "it's not even known if it helps". Even if it doesn't prevent any asymptomatic cases at all, the demonstrated huge reduction in symptomatic cases is a huge help.

 

Nice, lay article about Omicron: Omicron Doesn't Infect the Lungs Very Well, Animal Studies Find - The New York Times

A spate of new studies on lab animals and human tissues are providing the first indication of why the Omicron variant causes milder disease than previous versions of the coronavirus.

In studies on mice and hamsters, Omicron produced less damaging infections, often limited largely to the upper airway: the nose, throat and windpipe. The variant did much less harm to the lungs, where previous variants would often cause scarring and serious breathing difficulty.
. . .
Experiments on animals can help clear up these ambiguities, because scientists can test Omicron on identical animals living in identical conditions. More than half a dozen experiments made public in recent days all pointed to the same conclusion: Omicron is milder than Delta and other earlier versions of the virus.

On Wednesday, a large consortium of Japanese and American scientists released a report on hamsters and mice that had been infected with either Omicron or one of several earlier variants. Those infected with Omicron had less lung damage, lost less weight and were less likely to die, the study found.

Although the animals infected with Omicron on average experienced much milder symptoms, the scientists were particularly struck by the results in Syrian hamsters, a species known to get severely ill with all previous versions of the virus.
. . .​

By no means is Omicron 'harmless' but rather 'less bad.' The six week lag for death still holds.

Bob Wilson