1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Prius Occupants Survive Horrific Crash

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Main Forum' started by DaveinOlyWA, May 31, 2005.

  1. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    466
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    I don't think the Prius is the first application of that type of steel. But it is nice to have, definitely.
     
  2. Vernon

    Vernon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    63
    0
    0
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Thanks for posting a link to the article, Ian. Although that's not the one I recall seeing, it was nevertheless interesting.
     
  3. kirbinster

    kirbinster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    602
    0
    0
    Location:
    Morris County - New Jersey
    Still think my BWM with its six air bags and lots of safety stuff plus the 4500 pounds of weight is safer than my Prius. But I agree the Prius is safer than the old 1965 buick I drove in highschool.
     
  4. flareak

    flareak Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    1,016
    20
    0
    Location:
    St Louis, MO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    i think it is the first to use ultra high strength steel
     
  5. Bill Lumbergh

    Bill Lumbergh USAF Aircraft Maintainer

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    537
    7
    0
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    The Porsche Boxster uses ultra-high strength steel on its side impact door beams and for the A-pillars going back to 1997. They also use boron steel for the rollbars.

    Manufacturers for years have been touting the use of high-strength steel in certain areas of their cars.

    IMO, the biggest safety advancement is not so much the materials, but the CAD designs of the cars with crumple zones and safety cages to protect the occupants, and side curtain airbags to keep people's bodies off the safety cage.
     
  6. flareak

    flareak Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    1,016
    20
    0
    Location:
    St Louis, MO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
  7. Bill Lumbergh

    Bill Lumbergh USAF Aircraft Maintainer

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    537
    7
    0
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I would guess the article is probably accurate, it's just not specific enough. Perhaps Toyota's Ultra-high strength steel is a different alloy than what Porsche uses?
     
  8. tbstout2

    tbstout2 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    156
    0
    3
    Location:
    Hallieford, VA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    III
    This is another reason why it's smart to buy a Prius - not just for the environmenal benefits, but for the safety features as well.
     
  9. kirbinster

    kirbinster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    602
    0
    0
    Location:
    Morris County - New Jersey
    Come on guys (and gals) you cannot change the laws of physics - specificly conservation of momentum (mass times velocity). Sure a Prius may stand up well to a head on crash against a Camry or other small car. But you will be much safer in a larger vehicle with airbags and crumple zones. If you get hit in the Prius by a full size Lexus or BMW or heaven help you a big Hummer, who do you think is going to be better off?
     
  10. bobjeri

    bobjeri New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    70
    0
    0
    Location:
    Olympic Penninsla, WA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Re: Here's the World Auto Steel article

    '''''I just got my new Prius after driving a no-air-bag Toyota truck for 13 years. '''''

    Ditto except it was 17 yrs and a 4x4 Toyota. We had friends in an Outback take a really serious front-side impact that destroyed the car. They walked away because all the bags deployed. That was much of the reason e insistend on Side bags.
     
  11. Ian MacDonald

    Ian MacDonald Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2005
    51
    1
    0
    Location:
    Benica, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    My friend, who walked away from his accident, hit a tractor-trailer head-on on a two lane highway. His car was a two-door late model Acura probably about the same size as the Prius. The car was totally demolished but the energy absorbing crumple zones and the air bags had done their job. I would think that you couldn't get a much bigger mass differential between his car and the truck. Surely the survivability in a BWM, Camry or other modern mid-sized car like the Prius could not be that much different. Todays automotive engineers seemed to have done a pretty good job leveling the playing field.

    Regards,

    -- Ian
     
  12. Tideland Prius

    Tideland Prius Moderator of the North
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    45,024
    16,242
    41
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Yeah but there's still the compatability problem. I was at a carpark one day. Next to me was a 240SX, early 90s model. In front of it was a Ford F-series pickup truck. They were both parked facing in so I could see the fronts of both cars. The height of the bumper of the Ford was soo much higher than that of the 240SX. The bottom of the Ford's bumper is probably midway up the hood of the 240SX. If those two were to collide head-on, say goodbye to the passengers in the Nissan.

    Even if two identical cars were to crash head-on, the one that's loaded with passengers and cargo (and hence riding slightly lower) will lose out.
     
  13. kirbinster

    kirbinster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    602
    0
    0
    Location:
    Morris County - New Jersey
    I was hit in the rear a number of years ago when driving Jeep Grand cherokee. The car that hit me was a Trans Am with a Tee Top. A panel truck loaded with heavy tools then smashed into him. His front went under my rear bumper and my trailer hitch hit the top of his engine. The truck crunched him into me and the Tee Tops exploded. They needed the jaws of life to cut the guy out. I had about $500 damage to the Jeep. The truck has about the same damage. The guy in the Trans AM spent 3 months in the hospital, was paralyzed and his car was totalled. I guess that sums it up.
     
  14. Ian MacDonald

    Ian MacDonald Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2005
    51
    1
    0
    Location:
    Benica, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    I guess the point that I was trying to make here is that there have been some pretty significant advances in vehicle design and safety systems in the last decade. If the integrity of the passenger compartment can be maintained (e.g., with advances in frame design and new high strength steel and such) and you can keep the passengers for hitting the compartment's structures (e.g., with restraints and air bags), you've got a pretty good chance of surviving most accidents.

    As for examples of older vehicles and older vehicle designs not being safe, well, that's why I stopped driving my 13 year old truck and bought the Prius.

    I wouldn't have thought my friend could possibly have survived his head-on collision with a tractor-trailer before it happened either, yet he walked away and is still here today.

    The point made earlier in this thread about the Prius and the Taurus both colliding with the trailer in a similar fashion seems to make the case that these newer designs are, anecdotally at least, more survivable.

    Regards,

    -- Ian