Oil Analysis, Redline D6 ATF 30k miles

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Technical Discussion' started by TheChip, Oct 22, 2018.

  1. Bill Norton

    Bill Norton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    1,957
    658
    0
    Location:
    MONW, Ks.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    > As you said, the Prius is not a 'Metal V-Belt CVT' that needs a special lube.

    >>I assume you are talking about a shop you work at. Did you look at the thread I linked above with several Oil Analyses of the ATF from Prii Transaxles?
    I had 'very unusual' fluid come out of a 118k mile Prius and started a thread on the subject.
    Maybe my particular car was a fluke...?...

    >>Agreed.
    I call it a Box'O Gears and Bearings with a couple of motors in there. And there is a differential down near the bottom back.
    In my limited experience, some desperately need a fluid change before 100k.
     
  2. yeldogt

    yeldogt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    810
    313
    0
    Location:
    NE
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    The question to ask with any analysis -- what does it say? does it matter? Your statement that your transmission would have failed had you not changed the fluid has no way to be verified. I also have no way of knowing if Toyota adds any ingredient to it's fluid to counteract any electrical needs as some say they do.

    I can assure the other poster that if Toyota could simple switch oil and achieve better results ... they would The idea that using special oil will garner 10% of some magical unleashed power .. is simply crazy. Too much money is spent trying to get 1% ... if $15 would get 2% ...it would be used in a second.

    Service intervals are dependent upon so many items -- the early "lifetime" boxes had inherent designs understanding additional clutch material may be present .. w/o combustion contamination transmission and especially differential oils have almost unlimited life span. The killer is water. What some view as dirty -- contaminated etc.. may not matter .. even viscosity (thicker typically w/age) does not typically matter .. except possibly with "feel" on a small mechanical device like a manual transmission. The power loss is minor. Lower viscosity can affect both performance and overall life.

    One of my first jobs after school involved recycling fluids. The Navy was bringing the WWII battleships back online in the 80's --- the amount of fluids contained in a battleship is not to be believed. Interesting stuff ... we developed equipment to do it.

    My company has a fleet of vehicles -- so I'm talking about our own vehicles.

    Again -- we change them out around 100k or so. It's cheap and easy ... but, I don't see any benefit to using another fluid vs what's in the box.
     
    Raytheeagle likes this.
  3. Bill Norton

    Bill Norton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    1,957
    658
    0
    Location:
    MONW, Ks.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    >I agree. I was being dramatic. But it did have a bad metallic sheen and the analysis was really bad. They could not do a particle count on the first sample because it was so dark.
    Probably at the most it would have turned into a whiny loud gearbox as it grew older.
    It may have been a fluke, but it was on the road to an earlier than usual death.

    >> I agree again!
     
  4. edthefox5

    edthefox5 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    10,096
    4,821
    0
    Location:
    Clearwater, Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Who said it would unleash 10 % magical power? Don’t make up things that were not said to prove your pointless point.

    Your just another poster who has never tried anything other than what comes in the car but will talk a lot of crap about something you know nothing about. This is a Car forum Some people like to try different products on there car. News flash There’s aLot of very good products out there. It’s not your car so why do you care?
     
    Grit likes this.
  5. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Witness Leader

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    57,108
    39,429
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    One reason I care: a lot owners, who've not thoroughly read their (800 page) Owner's Manuals, haven't seen the warning against using alternate transaxle fluids, are going to read this thread, think yeah alternative, better fluid, that's for me. I really think there should be editorial warning on the first page, that this thread goes against very emphatic advice from Toyota, namely: that Toyota AFT WS is the only fluid you should be using in the transaxle, that any other fluid could damage it.

    Sure, maybe hogwash, but that's Toyota's stance.

    And for that reason, I think this thread needs to at least acknowledge that, up front. Or just be closed?

    I appreciate the OP can't edit it now, but maybe the moderators can weigh in? I'll report this post, leave it up to them.
     
    Tande likes this.
  6. TheChip

    TheChip Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2017
    388
    1,210
    0
    Location:
    Misissippi
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    We're all VERY aware of your stance based on what's in the owners manual.

    There are many users out there who have been using redline for years with no issues, unless you call reduced wear and increased performance an issue. It's been discussed to death that those warnings were placed there for legal reasons, in case someone decides to put olive oil or some other garbage in there.

    This is an enthusiast forum, this is exactly the kind of content you should expect on a car forum. Report away, the rest of us will continue gathering ever mounting evidence while you thumb through the manual.
     
  7. TheChip

    TheChip Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2017
    388
    1,210
    0
    Location:
    Misissippi
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    This is another thing that bothers me. People like to think WS is some magical Prius only fluid that was designed ONLY for the Prius so it's the ONLY thing you should use. Toyota uses WS is nearly all of their automatic vehicles. It's not special, it doesnt have properties specific to the Prius. I've pasted some more information below for people to take a look at.

    Question :
    (1)Why did Toyota change their transmission fluid to World Standard ( WS ) in 2005 ?

    Answer : Selling 168,000 2nd generation tacomas in 2005 , Toyota needed to find a way to avoid hefty environmental fees .Toyota pays an environmental fee for each vehichle they sell to us . This was acheived by introducing WS fluid to the market as a lifetime fluid capable of 100k without as much as a service saving Toyota millions .Toyota wanted you as a customer to beleive that WS was created to save fuel which is simply not true .

    (2)Was there anything wrong with the fluid they recommended for their transmissions from 1972 - 2002 ?

    Yes , Toyota had to pay environmental fees because the fluid used needed servicing much sooner

    (3)Did they do it for reliability ?
    WS fluid cant handle any heat . This is extremelly well proven and will back up everything mentioned in this post .There are some proven accounts listed here http://www.artsautomotive.com/about/78-genuine-fluids

    (4) Did they do it to save their customers money by changing the transmission service interval to 100,000 miles ?

    Answer ...No, We know that synthetic tends to flow better when its cold, that it resists shearing better than conventional, that it protects better under high heat conditions, and that in general it usually has a lower NOACK and a higher film strength. WS transmission fluid is not synthetic like Toyota has claimed .

    (5)Did they spend countless hours engineering a new transmission fluid that would last forever and was far superior to any other fluid on the market and did the engineers look at what happens when the fluid breaks down ?

    Answer . No - Toyota introduced WS fluid to save money on environmental tax fees by telling the government that WS fluid would last 100,000 miles without a service . If you look at the bottom of this post , the contents of WS fluid has been broken down into particulates . Notice anything unusual ? what are the professional oil analysts saying about WS when exposed to heat and why did Toyota suddenly and recently change the transmission service interval from 100k down to 60K? NOTE : check the fees when purchasing your truck

    (6)Why does Aisn Warner who make the transmission say that the transmission fluid needs to be changed every 30 k and 25 k under severe use yet Toyota says the fluid is good for 100k ?

    (7)What parts within the transmission changed making the new WS fluid necessary ?

    The A750 series which was released in 2003 reqiured WS fluid yet the clutching , electronics and converter clutch were similar to the A340 from the early 1990,s . Much the same as the Toyota camry using the identical transmission and clutching yet now requires WS fluid

    (8)What is so special about this fancy WS transmission fluid that Toyota recommends for The Aisn Warner A750 series transmission ?

    Lets have a peek at the content of WS fluid
    The WS fluid is nothing special and not synthetic like Toyata claims . Taking a look at the MSDS for WS fluid designed by Exxon , pay close attention to the flashpoint and you are going to see that WS collapses massively under heat
    http://www.kd5byb.net/Tundra/ATF%20WS%20MSDS1.pdf

    Now take a look at WS fluid designed by Esso and notice the flashpoint is much lower than the Exxon WS but still collapses massively under heat
    http://www.kd5byb.net/Tundra/ATF WS MSDS2.pdf

    Now take a look at the German blend of WS known as Ravenol . In the link provided , you are going to see that WS is used in many different vehicles in Europe . What we can conclude from this is that WS is not specific to Toyota . Still waiting for an msds from Ravenol to compare against the North American blends . I highly expect a totally different fluid similar to Max Life
    http://www.ravenol.de/produkte/verwendung/d/Product/show/p/ravenol-atf-t-ws-lifetime.html
     
    DigitalNomad, Bill Norton and Fred_H like this.
  8. Bill Norton

    Bill Norton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    1,957
    658
    0
    Location:
    MONW, Ks.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    This claim came from some BMW Geek forum post that was mentioned up thread.
    A supposed before and after dyno run....:whistle: Even the OP called it bunk.

    Obviously you can't be losing 10% rear wheel power to the lubes. Your transmission and diff would be running really hot on the old lubes. (Someone fiddled with the dyno cal between runs.) (A Redline mole? You decide....):LOL:
     
    TheChip likes this.
  9. TheChip

    TheChip Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2017
    388
    1,210
    0
    Location:
    Misissippi
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    You'd have a hard time getting a 10% inprovement by switching from peanut butter to atf fluid, so that's an easy claim to disregard.

    The focus should definitely be on longevity of the transmission. Any minor gains would be in the sub MPG category. The same applies to motor oil, although you can have more of an impact on MPG there.
     
    #49 TheChip, Nov 1, 2018
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2018
  10. Bill Norton

    Bill Norton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    1,957
    658
    0
    Location:
    MONW, Ks.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    Should this editorial warning also state that Toyota emphatically does not mention any preventive maintenance schedule AT ALL for this very simple transaxle?

    "Change this fluid at your own risk. It is not advised per The Official Toyota Owner's Manual."

    What a silly position to take with zero evidence..... We need a fresh horse carcass....
     
    kerbear54, m.wynn, TheChip and 3 others like this.
  11. edthefox5

    edthefox5 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    10,096
    4,821
    0
    Location:
    Clearwater, Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    Two

    Now you want the thread killed because you disagree with it. Thats just not right.
     
    kerbear54, m.wynn, Grit and 1 other person like this.
  12. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Witness Leader

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    57,108
    39,429
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    Yeah fair enough.
     
    m.wynn and Threej like this.
  13. yeldogt

    yeldogt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    810
    313
    0
    Location:
    NE
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Five

    It was post #19 .. by USLE. And ..... I actually do know something .. Thank you.
     
  14. yeldogt

    yeldogt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    810
    313
    0
    Location:
    NE
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    What people are not getting. What's good enough? There is no point in making an oil or fluid stand up to a blow torch -- if it's never going to have those conditions. Cars are also built to fluids ... in other words. We need to design this system based on this fluid -- that we know we will be using. The marketing around fluids is not unlike brake pads .. there is money to be made getting people to switch to a "premium" product that may or may not be "premium" or the premium may not be needed.

    The simple fact: Everything is really good today -- coupled with better designs and superior manufacturing. Early plastics do not like some later fluids .. there can be any number of tiny reason for recommending a previous fluid.

    One must remember that early auto fluid used whale oil .... yes ... blubber. It's the best natural friction modifier ... now you can see the problem with this correct? By the late 60's the precursor to the EU and by the early 70's the USA was getting a little upset going after Moby just so our Caddy's trans shifted smooth. That .. NASA and the DOD .. started most the development. M1 was the first product commercially sold ..... in the mid 70's. I was around in the 80's when early hydraulic fluids started to use the same technology.

    It's all based off Dexron ... in fact if you google ..you should be able to find most of the changes as DEX II and III moved along. Again -- it's base specification. It's the friction modifiers in Mercon .. or lack of in the Japanese design that make the differences.

    I think Mendel is concerned because you don't want people doing things based on posts -- if you want to try something yourself .. fine.
     
    #54 yeldogt, Nov 3, 2018
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2018
    Raytheeagle and Mendel Leisk like this.
  15. Usle

    Usle Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2018
    317
    139
    0
    Location:
    Me
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Plug-in Advanced
    Encore

    Some years back I was reading in an auto enthusiasts magazine about a person that had a BMW M3, he dynoed the car and then replaced the engine transmission and rear end oil and lubricants with red line, he then dynoed the car again and had a 10% increase in rear wheel horse power, The article was extensive, dyno readouts, dyno machine, it wasn't smoke and mirrors.

    I had just bought a Kubota with 43HP, of course I changed the motor and transmission oils out for red line, never dynoed it but....when the hydrostatic transmission overheats because I push to hard or lift to heavy, it smells almost wonderful.
    On the other hand my 15 ram ecodiesel runs uric acid and when I start it in cold weather the exhaust smell putrid.
    The moral of the story remains the same, Red Line makes a superior product which ever of it's products you choose. And using Red Line for the transaxle in a prius is a wise move.
    Or using Red Line for the ice would also be beneficial.
     
    edthefox5 likes this.
  16. yeldogt

    yeldogt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    810
    313
    0
    Location:
    NE
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    You do understand that more power can be achieved at the expense of longevity -- Friction /longevity ... pick.

    There is no moral of the story ... It's marketing.

    I take my hat off to them ... it's been successful.
     
  17. Grit

    Grit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2017
    6,219
    4,092
    1
    Location:
    Wilkes Land
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    Redline engine oil has higher content of ZDDP added than most engine oil, below can happen to your vehicle if using redline:

    "An oil that contains a higher dose of ZDDP won’t harm a converter initially. But over tens of thousands of miles of driving, the extra zinc and phosphorus may slowly poison the catalyst and eventually cause the converter to fail. The more oil the engine uses, the faster the contamination occurs in the converter. Once converter efficiency drops below a certain threshold, it will trip the OBD II catalyst efficiency monitor, set a fault code (P0420) and turn on the Check Engine light. The engine will still run fine and performance will likely be unaffected (unless there is an exhaust restriction), but the vehicle won’t pass an emissions test until the converter problem has been fixed." -Motor Oil Issues - Engine Builder Magazine
     
  18. edthefox5

    edthefox5 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    10,096
    4,821
    0
    Location:
    Clearwater, Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Been running a Redline motor oil for 60000 miles and 6 years with no issue.i wouldn’t use this expensive oil if my cAr was burning oil. I woukd use cheap oil till I replaced the motor.
     
    Raytheeagle likes this.
  19. yeldogt

    yeldogt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    810
    313
    0
    Location:
    NE
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Five

    What does that prove? What issues would you expect using Toyota oil -- or another?

    I own a fleet of cars (personal and business). Have bought hundreds of cars since 1990 -- millions of miles. In all that time -- one engine problem. That was a Ford V8 -- plastic intake leaked -- known defect. The reality: Oil choice almost does not matter -- it's all that good. The fleet magazines and journals talk about this and there are people with much larger fleets than I with the same results -- use a quality filter and major brand of oil in the proper weight specified by the manufacturer. The fleet cars have all gone past 200k since the first lexus vehicles. Cars up until the very late 90's did not last as long -- the engines did but everything else was failing.

    Frankly -- When I started switching to Lexus vehicles in the early 00's I was shocked how clean the oil was at the 7500k mark .. it was a shame to toss it out. Same with the Prius and Lexus CT's -- amazingly clean at 10k. I use M1...Pennzoil often as we get killer deals .. both in the big bottles.

    The Euro cars get M1 because of the FSS tracer.
     
    mjoo likes this.
  20. Bill Norton

    Bill Norton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    1,957
    658
    0
    Location:
    MONW, Ks.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    OK, New info! I'll bite:

    1> Is there a published list of ZDDP content in popular engine oils, like Mobil 1, M1 Extended Performance, and, let's say Toyota's house brand of syn motor oil?

    2> What is 'FSS tracer'? Is it a good thing? Brand specific?

    3> Why do some Gen 3 Prii experience EGR/Intake track clogging and others seem fine at high miles?
    Has there ever been a Gen3 catalytic converter go bad?
     
    edthefox5 likes this.