Gore Refuses to Hear GOP Statement on GW

When your home team congress is being stupid and you have no defense for their behavior, focus on a spelling error, it will deflect from the real problem at hand.

Brilliant!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Mar 21 2007, 01:18 PM) [snapback]409622[/snapback]</div>

Unlike Clinton and Carter, there is evidence of selective political motivation for firing these attorneys... like they were weeding out all the ones that were not "loyal Bushies" (kyle sampson's words, not mine).

I am personally very happy to see Congress conducting oversight again. Clearly, those on the other side like yourself think that oversight is overrated and just prefer a rubber-stamp Congress.

To me, it's been 6 long years that the Congress has been giving carte blanche to the President, and now with the opposition party in power, it's their constitutional role to play to provide a big check to the President, and that's exactly what they are doing.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Mar 21 2007, 12:42 PM) [snapback]409586[/snapback]</div>

Well I'm going to Subpoena that plant, once I get jurisDICK-shun over it.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Mar 21 2007, 01:18 PM) [snapback]409622[/snapback]</div>

First, Bush already fired the old AGs when he came into office. It is however, unprecendent to fire them halfway through their terms for POLITICAL reasons. One day after AG Carol Lam informed justice about her forthcoming prosecutions of Randy Cunningham, Kyle Sampson suggested she be fired.

The Bush admin was putting pressure on AGs to investigate Democrats. Carol Lam investigated -- a now well proven -- horribly corrupt Republican, Randy Cunningham -- regarding military defense contracting corruption, and got fired. Lam was actively investigating Republican Congressman Jerry Lewis at the time of her dismissal.

Bush only had the ability to reappoint new AG's mid-term wihtout senate approval through a clause slipped into the Patriot Act -- a clause removed yesterday by the Senate.

The Investigation is about politicizing the Department of Justice under the Bush administration, and worthy of full investigation.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Mar 21 2007, 12:45 PM) [snapback]409638[/snapback]</div>

you know you keep throwing out these empty challenges on proving someones claim about another persons stupidity/intelligence but you yourself are very, very quick to throw someone in the stupid bucket because ...well YOU think them so. No facts, no test scores, no medical analysis. Really this is getting childish and I think you need a nap, cause man you are too grumpy. <_<

So, here is my challenge to you md and anyone else really. Please give us a well worded and constructive criticism of the speech, followed by some universally sensible suggestions, such as : go buy a hybrid car and force your staff to do the same. Add solar panels to your mansion and print your next book on recycled paper.

I agree that anyone jet setting with his/her personal plane to attend speeches and panels on environmental issues, is being disingenuous at best.

I want to focus on a solutions not on who said what. Let politicians be what they may, the sustainable solution lies with us and not with the government!

 

"I want to focus on a solutions not on who said what. Let politicians be what they may, the sustainable solution lies with us and not with the government!"

Well stated.
I'm here at Prius chat, because I want us off the black cocaine and am willing to pay more for my energy use to do so. I don't care who the messenger is or even what the talking point is. Global warming is probably the least important reason to get off the oil. The debate needs to be the endgoal, not the reasoning.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Mar 21 2007, 10:13 AM) [snapback]409514[/snapback]</div>

The clown is the one sitting in the Oval office. The clown siting in the Oval office wouldn't make a good greeter at WalMart. So far mr. clowny has gotten us into an intractible war that he said would be over in a month, now going on 5 years. Done virtually nothing about the disaster in New Orleans. If he hasn't killed the soldiers in Iraq he is trying his best at Walter Reed. Completely politicized the Justice department. Put his do nothing political hacks into every other agency in the government. I could go on and on but YOU would with your head so far up you a** could see any of it.

 

Allright fbear, let's not stoop to that level.
If you let an idiott drag you down to their level, they'll beat you with experience.

 

I just get very very tired of dbermanmd's one sided posting that do nothing to further the discussion on any topic that he deems worthy. His disstain for anything other than his warped sensibilities and his undying loyalty to a President who might go down as having the worst presidency since that of James Buchanan, Millard Fillmore, Herbert Hoover and Andrew Johnson (not in chronological or worst order).

 

...

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Mar 21 2007, 02:47 PM) [snapback]409724[/snapback]</div>

surely you meant "whines" and sadly enough the ones posted here are not even good enough for cooking.

How's about my challenge ?

 

"How's about my challenge ?"
Your challenge smells like troll feed....

 

hey don't you know, trolls become extinct with the onset of GW/GCC