For those who voted for Bush in '04...

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(larkinmj @ May 14 2006, 08:29 AM) [snapback]255142[/snapback]</div>

I might pay more attention to the right wingers if they at least learned how to spell. Nothing deflates a rebuttal like illiteracy in the simple things. I can forgive the forum spell check for not knowing how to spell PROZAC but it should know "might".

As for meds, I'll gladly share my hydroclorothiazide. That's high blood pressure medication. And my Protonix, that's for acid reflux.

Thank YOU, Mr. Bush.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(prez1 @ May 14 2006, 08:43 AM) [snapback]255147[/snapback]</div>

The Republicans in my state voted for Randy "Duke" Cunningham repeatedly. Now they're going to put Brian Billbray in office.

They get what they deserve. I'm glad I don't live in that district. But that doesn't mean Billbray do any damage that affects me.


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(kirbinster @ May 14 2006, 09:33 AM) [snapback]255163[/snapback]</div>

Democrats are the ONES.

You need to read up on commas too.

Actually, I'll be voting AGAINST an ideology. If the Republicans can agree on one.

Are you for small government or the Feds sticking their noses into what is under the authority of the states?

Are you for fiscal responsibility or big deficits?

ONCE you make up your minds, let the rest of us know.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 14 2006, 02:51 PM) [snapback]255395[/snapback]</div>

Three, count'em, three, all against this "war". I'm too young to have had protested against Vietnam.

1. Westwood Federal building.
2. Las Vegas Blvd.
3. Downtown Los Angeles.

Setting myself on fire at an anti-war rally? Is that really the best you can do? And now you pull out and dust off Cindy Sheehan as YOUR example of a person who is really making a statement - after YOU were the one who began the post here entitled, "Why I Think Cindy Sheehan is a NUTJOB"?

Your message grows inconsistent, your voice is weak. Develop some integrity, then we'll debate.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sufferin' Prius Envy @ May 13 2006, 04:45 PM) [snapback]254926[/snapback]</div>

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ScubaX @ May 13 2006, 11:49 PM) [snapback]255084[/snapback]</div>

Scubax, In the immortal words of Kelly Pickler . . . “Ahm Sawry.†[American Idol reference]
I'm guessing the double entendre nature of my post was a little too advanced for you.
Maybe I should have gone with a single entendre for you.
Comprehend it again! This time reflect on my phrase “. . . "not-elected†to his third term?â€

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 14 2006, 03:46 AM) [snapback]255104[/snapback]</div>

So what's next? Concentration camps for anyone who by your judgment fits the criterion of 'liberalism'?

Or should we expect a secret nuking of one of the 'liberal' cities by bushistas in order to institute more FEAR?

Obviously, placing a blame on whomever else. Consequently, revoking all the rights, amendments etc so your leader will become a president for life.

No further comment, as you have achieved an apogee of radicalism.

:blink:

 

QUOTE(Schmika @ May 14 2006, 04:31 PM)
If the choices were the same yes, if there was different, maybe not.

HOWEVER, I will NEVER vote democrat because, as a whole, the party is morally bankrupt. I still see honest Republicans all over the place. I have NEVER seen an honorable democrat above county level politics.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(larkinmj @ May 14 2006, 06:30 PM) [snapback]255414[/snapback]</div>

And what former president won the Nobel Peace Prize??? Oh yea it was Jimmy Carter, Democrat.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(seeh2o @ May 14 2006, 08:46 PM) [snapback]255446[/snapback]</div>

ha, yeah, I can go stand within a group of people too and feel smug. C'mon, what have you done of significance to protest the war aside from standing amongst a group of people commiserating how evil Bush is, or whatever the popular ideal was. Something amongst the lines of... equivalent to actually serving, something real, something as meaningful, poignant, as serving. I may certainly think Cindy Sheehan is a nut job, but SHE puts her money with her mouth is. She did a bit more than stand in a crowd. And while I do think she's a nut job, she garners an awful lot of respect for going out and doing what she's done.

As for debating, sorry, but there's no such thing with your ilk, you've drawn your predetermined conclusions, and resort to the cookie cutter "I'll bet they aren't signing up at the recruiting office..." argument spoon fed to you by the michael moore's of the world, whenever someone counters your viewpoint, as was the FIRST thing out of your mouth regarding my post.

It's ok though, because there's a perfectly apporpriate way to deal with such: steamroll right over your irrationality, as the last two elections have effectively done. You claim my voice is weak, I say no one even heard yours.




<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dsunman @ May 14 2006, 10:57 PM) [snapback]255484[/snapback]</div>

That's right, from your perspective I certainly have, and when those such as yourself make such ridiculous claims, it is all the more appropriate.

"Mole hills into moutains" should be the official motto of the current liberalist movements, or, actually, more appropriately, "...talking loud and saying nothing...", for which I've observed, you're quite an artist at...

 

George is a good man doing a good job - Yes I would vote for him again!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Subversive @ May 14 2006, 02:15 PM) [snapback]255363[/snapback]</div>

I meant you take up the same physical space as anyone else (meaning your body, not all your possessions). Rich people are bad, for instance one rich guy is the landlord at the office where I work, and another rich guy owns the factory that produces the products we sell, so you're right ... they are taking up more room. But they are also employing me, so I forgive them for that.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ May 14 2006, 07:45 PM) [snapback]255416[/snapback]</div>

[attachmentid=3450]

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 14 2006, 11:47 PM) [snapback]255501[/snapback]</div>

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 14 2006, 03:46 AM) [snapback]255104[/snapback]</div>

you're just a wanking topper of argumentum ad hominem irrefutably, sadly devoid of reductionism.

re-iron your brown shirt boy...

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ May 14 2006, 04:45 PM) [snapback]255416[/snapback]</div>

How about the word "lying"? See post #33 where it is spelled "lieing". Is that an example of a rebuttal deflated by illiteracy in simple things?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dsunman @ May 15 2006, 12:04 AM) [snapback]255518[/snapback]</div>

...someone once said it best: "dung heap of literary dadaism..." :lol:


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(fshagan @ May 15 2006, 12:10 AM) [snapback]255520[/snapback]</div>

:lol:

PWN3D.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 15 2006, 12:14 AM) [snapback]255523[/snapback]</div>

whomever said it must have been a klutz.

you seem to be even 'klutzier' klutz for coming up with splendiferous ECLAT below :lol:

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 14 2006, 03:46 AM) [snapback]255104[/snapback]</div>

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dsunman @ May 15 2006, 12:29 AM) [snapback]255530[/snapback]</div>

"Talking loud and saying nothing..."

...the attempt to obfuscate using non-natural vocabulary...

...high school kids do it all the time... :lol:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 15 2006, 12:35 AM) [snapback]255533[/snapback]</div>

non-natural vocabulary for a klutz for sure :lol:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dsunman @ May 15 2006, 12:37 AM) [snapback]255534[/snapback]</div>

"THIS ARGUMENT HAS BECOME TIRESOME."
[attachmentid=3455]


B)

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ May 15 2006, 12:39 AM) [snapback]255536[/snapback]</div>

your ad hominem arguments are always tiresome.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dsunman @ May 14 2006, 08:46 PM) [snapback]255540[/snapback]</div>

Amen.

And as I said before, all blow and no go. He is the the man behind his own curtain. Wiz away MS.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(fshagan @ May 14 2006, 02:29 PM) [snapback]255298[/snapback]</div>

No, they're based on what you earn. Those that earn between $40,000 and $70,000 will get approximately $56. By your standards, I obviously don't earn enough to pay my "fair share". I guess it's my fault I don't make enough money. I guess anyone that doesn't take in a few hundred thousand dollars a year is just plain lazy.