It's gotten a lot of attention very quickly. I'm hoping that's enough to keep it from doing much more harm.
SARS was what, 2003? Killed about 800 and really revised how folks treat new disease jumps between species.
the bit I'm worried about is that I keep hearing about a 14+ day incubation before symptoms. So even though the news has been blowing up for the past 72 hours or so, the real damage was long since done.
Yes, as with measles, if the early days don't knock you flat, you get to act as a mobile transmitter. All the best viruses go that way. World Health Org (WHO) stopped one step short of going nuclear on this one this week. Wuhan is building a new hospital in a couple of weeks Virus-marred city to speed-build 1,000-bed hospital - Chinadaily.com.cn I'm going to family-required dinner party tonight and you betcha there will be masks. PS: sleepy Kunming now has 2 but I don't know if 2 is in the same tank as 1.
2019-nCoV virus will surpass 41 (disclosed) dead and ~1400 (disclosed) infected. Looks pretty frisky now. Unless preceded by someone else here I will start a separate thread. Y'all ought to know something about how virus, bacteria and other critters cause diseases in humans. How we fight back, and how that fight may need to change. It is actually a bit complicated and I may put more effort into a brief for Current Biology (journal) than for you freeloaders
i dreamt last night that i was invited to a party in a room with 20% norovirus. i tried to decline...
GEDI instrument on ISS is a great tool for terrestrial carbon counters NASA forest structure mission releases first data
I hope it does not seem tiresome to discuss solar irradiance effects on Earth climate. On one hand it is self evident. On the other, it has been a rhetorical gambit leading to a false paradox. Briefly, "If solar then not CO2" New research on solar vs. climate is always of interest to me, so am obliged to link: https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Scientists_show_solar_system_processes_control_the_carbon_cycle_throughout_Earths_history_999.html
We may have difference perception. I thoroughly agree that solar is our primary heat source. A speculated solar minimum and orbital solar influx is possible. But orbital mechanics is not trivial. We, our species, may be carbonized CO[2] and species subject to the the results. I and my peers will subject to none of these effects. Bob Wilson
Peat bogs are major carbon sink when they are healthy, and Scotland is working to restore their damaged ones. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00355-3
Species persistence vs. climate change: Climate change may not claim as many species as we thought | Popular Science Lots of biological illustrations for free: You Can Now Download 150,000 Free Illustrations of the Natural World |Smart News | Smithsonian Magazine
I enjoyed this article, Was thinking the other day we as humans sometimes think we are disconnected from other species or better than other species. Who is better prepared for life - a human with all their intelligence or a sparrow who is content in bitter winter or hot summer with nothing but its natural feather covering, feeding by aerating the earth looking for insects or worms and fertilizing the earth as it goes about its business. Who is smarter and more environmentally friendly, a Phd scientist who drives a Tesla or a squirrel who humbly goes about his business hunting for acorns and walnuts burying some for winter that eventually sprout into trees and spawn even more forest, a squirrel is comfortable in his own skin in winter,summer,spring or fall never using fossils fuels to warm himself and only produces waste products that naturally decompose to nourish the earth. Wonder if we as humans have very inflated opinions of ourselves and our place in the natural world
I have no problems with IEA. If I see some other report that agrees or disagrees, I'll add it. IEA is not the only C counter.
A new analysis of electric vs. highly efficient petrol vehicles: Are Electric Vehicles Really Better for the Climate? Yes. Here’s Why - Union of Concerned Scientists
How plants and animals domesticate each other is a delightfully arcane subject: Anthropogenic seed dispersal: Rethinking the origins of plant domestication -- ScienceDaily
Actually it's pleasant that we hear less about iconoclastic climate studies there days. Other fish (bats?) to fry. But Zharkova's solar study has been de-published. Was it Bob who drew our attention to that? Anyway, retraction watch is on the watch: Heavily criticized paper blaming the sun for global warming is retracted – Retraction Watch
"These oscillations of the baseline solar magnetic field are found associated with a long-term solar inertial motion about the barycenter of the solar system ... " If any planets exist, then the central body always orbits around the barycenter. (So do the planets.) That is almost the definition of a barycenter. If there are some oscillations, they must be in something about the orbits of the planets.