I have no idea of what one pays for a early 2000's 911. I only know that the last 911 I sold was a '82 sc that I sold for ~$10k a couple of years ago. Are you suggesting that my $15k guestimate is too high or too low? "Your concerns are legitimate, so I will address them. First of all, Paul is not a "tinkerer." He runs an established EV conversion shop. My mistake was that he had not previously had experience with lithium batteries. I was not aware of that." IMHO, established EV conversion shop or not,,, it is still in essence a backyard project. Never done a lithium battery project, nor a Porsche (I suspect) leave you the beta tester. My point it I would much rather be a guinea pig with a cheaper donor. A civic or a Toyota would have all the safety stuff (maybe more) than the Porsche has. I agree that there is no arguing the "I just want it factor" People drive all kinds of vehicles just because they want to,, I once had an Edsel! Icarus
I like to tinker, hence the clean-sheet-of-paper approach. If I don't tinker on something, I might become sinister and enslave a country, possibly the entire planet
A 2003 Porsche Carrera goes for about $30,000 to $35,000. The company that converted David's Porsche specializes in Porsche 911 conversions.
I stand corrected on both accounts! Still sounds like an expensive test bed to me. What is the conversion cost? Icarus
There must be a enough world-domination computer games to satisfy your urges, at least for a few hours at a time.
daniel, i would love to own your porsche, just not sure i would have paid as much is all. but heck, i paid $14,500 for my Zenn and they currently have AC versions going for $9,999!! so i am not sure i should have paid what i paid for my EV... but to be honest with ya, its not the performance that is the key thing. who buys a Corvette so they can drive 120 mph?? not many. most buy one because they are cool. and even my lowly, short-ranged, slow, boxy blue Zenn is considered very cool by everyone who happens to comment on it and i get comments nearly every day. besides, daniel, your answer is just around the corner, next year, spring for an eestor conversion!!
A 26-year-old car costs less than a 5-year-old car. It has fewer safety features, and ordinary components are wearing out. You have very strong opinions, and you are entitled to them. But you should be wary of inventing false accusations in support of your opinions. They tend to undermine your argument in the end. I made a mistake. Have you ever made a mistake? When you do, do you look back or do you look forward? Those sorts of projects tend to end badly. Or an Obvio. I'd love to have an Obvio. It looks like the car Roger Rabbit would drive.
Actually, the performance was important, and is the reason for my disappointment: I wanted 125 miles, and acceleration in the 8 or 9 second range. The car would have been worth what I paid for it, to me, had it performed as promised. So I made a mistake. As it performs, it's worth to me half what I paid. But it's too late to change that now. Water under the bridge. And I see no point in trying to squeeze Paul into giving me my money back, as that would be useless and probably impossible. So there's nothing to do but enjoy it for what it is and can do.
Daniel, You misinterpret some of what I say. First,,,my reference to the '81 sc was for price comparison only. I understand a 2002 car will have many features that an '82 won't. Second,, I applaud you for taking a risk, being forward thinking,, and pushing the envelope. My point however still stands (IMHO) that it is an expensive endeavor that by you own admission performs to about have of it's "advertised" spec. While you may love the car for a variety of reasons,, if you had bought the car from Porsche with advertised range, speed, power, specs etc and got it home with only 50% performance I think you would be more upset,, you would demand a refund. Which brings me to my final point. This is at it's core essentially a one off "tinkerer project" in spite of the experience and professionalism of the folks doing it. As you said yourself,, most tinkerers project end badly. This is no denigration of your specific project,, just of the process in general. Even Tesla,, can in some measure be considered a tinkerers project,,until the cookie cutter can stamp out roadsters without having to hand build them. As I said at the very beginning of this thread, you have a cool car that doesn't perform to expectations. If it were me,, I would rather have done this on a cheaper platform. So enjoy you car,, and when I come through Spokane, I will keep an eye out for it. Icarus
Icarus: Thank you. Yes, I think I was put off by the tone of your earlier post and some of the off-the-wall statements in it. I agree that there is a haphazard element in any hand-built conversion project (though I disagree that that's what the Tesla Roadster is: Lamborghinis are hand-built, and not a "tinkerer" project). And I understand that a more "rational" person would have preferred a cheaper platform. In the end, I could not find a shop that would do this on a Civic, which would have been my first choice, and I had both rational and emotional reasons for choosing to do it on a Porsche, not the least of which was Paul's reputation, though in hindsight I should have picked someone else. If you come through Spokane, get in touch, and I'll give you a ride in it, if I'm in town and time permits.
No harm no foul,,, Good luck with your project. As for lambourgini's being a tinkerer's project,,, While I would love to drive one,,, and have coveted a 250 Gt Ferrari,,, I think of any Italian car to be a tinkerers dream,,, just the scope, scale,,, not to mention expense of the tinkering. Fiat anyone? British cars fall into the same boat,,, especially if it is raining. Don't get me started on French cars. My friend who owns a Trebant keeps it running easier than my friend with a Pugueot! Icarus
Daniel, I applaud your electric Porsche. Poo to the people who believe electrifying a Porsche is some kind of sacrilege, it's just a bloody swank looking car. As an electric car it still looks great and it's quiet, and green, what more do you want? Electrify a cheap econobox and you have an ugly electric econobox. Who wants an ugly electric car. A honda or Suzuki or Geo, may as well stick with the 3 wheeled clown car. Good on ya Daniel, I love the Porsche.
Oddly enough, those sort of games tend to make my sinister-world-domination urges *much* worse So I tinker harmlessly in the shop. I can entertain myself for *hours* with a welder, a cutting torch, a hot air reflow station, etc I don't usually make anything useful. Last year I spent the better part of the summer making a long, heavy box out of 1/4 plate steel, with many drawers inside. Then I lost interest in it and used a cutting torch to take it apart again Yes, I tend to recycle my scrap steel
Well, the ground is thick with used examples that have blown motors. The 3 cylinder Geo/Susuki sold here in North America didn't live long on a diet of API spec generic 5W-30 motor oil. A 15W-40 would have been *far* more appropriate in such a hard working motor, but folks wanted to save $4,50 per oil change and blow the motor instead Several years back, the Canadian weather channel featured a brief on a fellow in Toronto who converted his Geo to electric. It's a fairly popular and inexpensive conversion Electric Geo Metro If you have a rural estate, I can't think of a better way of putzing around down 2-5 km of gravel road. The Geo/Suzuki Metro also had a fairly compliant suspension, at least the sample I drove 15 years ago did. You could probably drive it down a washboardy gravel road without bouncing off into a ditch The Suzuki/Geo cars sold here didn't last long, as they were incompatible with salt used to deice roads. Unless rust treated annually, they rotted away fairly quickly
Geo Trackers are used extensively on Beaver Island, just north of where we live. They are cheap and small, and seem to do well on the crappy gravel roads. I'm not sure how well they hold up, but the mechanics at the rental agency are able to put them back together. The poor things rattle like a loose collection of parts flying in formation. Tom
Maybe it's your inner artist talking, trying to balance out that regimented engineering mind. You could make whimsical sculptures out of old farming equipment, and plant them around the yard like 'moderne' scarecrows.
My first-ever trip to Coeur d'Alene without consuming any gasoline at all. I took the shortest possible route there, which meant staying on surface roads for 4 1/2 miles, rather than taking the nearest freeway entrance 2 miles away. This cut a mile from my one-way distance. On the way back, I was doing so well that I stayed on the freeway to my usual exit (driving the extra mile I had skipped on the way out) and I drove an extra half mile to stop at the grocery store. I drove there at 55 mph, as near as I could hold it, probably varying from 53 to 57. But I was doing so well, that I drove home holding it between 55 and 60 mph. Total drive was 49 miles, total energy consumed was a shade under 17 kWh. Actually 346 wh/mi. This extrapolates to 81 miles to dead empty, or 64 miles to 80% DoD (depth of discharge). I was actually at 60.5% DoD, or well within safe limits. My bottom line for this car was that I wanted to be able to drive electric to Coeur d'Alene, rather than having to drive the stinker. And so, though the performance is disappointing, And I have to keep the speed down pretty low, I can do what I wanted with it.
A Porsche on I-90 Spokane- Post falls at 53mph,,, I think you should put a SMV triangle on the back and hope no one rear ends you! The triple trailer trucks in Idaho with the 75mph limit,,, all sounds like a recipe for disaster,,, no offense! Icarus.
:d :d :d Edit: Weird! I put smilies in, and they came out as colon, d P.S. I've decided to call it the Duck.