Burglarized Prius!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ Apr 1 2006, 04:32 AM) [snapback]233367[/snapback]</div>

Point well made. How odd to have gotten to this from a (probable) scam post about burglary. I value all life, I respect people who put themselves out there for their job. When a child loses a father who worked as a short order cook does he/she suffer any less than the child of the cop?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pcjr @ Apr 1 2006, 09:05 PM) [snapback]233555[/snapback]</div>

Why would you say that? I'm not bitter. I was pointing out that they conned many people including judges who questioned them, and the attorney they hired, along with the head of a private school where their kids went, the police, mortgage broker, high end furniture showroom sales people, other doctors and the hospital where the baby was born, the bank. Yet one question from you would have been all it would have taken to bring them down! These women were quite well versed in law and medicine. If they had spent more time studying law or medicine rather than scamming people they could have been very productive members of society, but then again they were psychopaths.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pcjr @ Apr 1 2006, 09:38 PM) [snapback]233579[/snapback]</div>

So I should have researched AOL's webpage designer???? I'm not involved with AOL in any way.

Unfortunately, Peter, upon being presented with facts, is attempting to redirect attention. Quoting Peter, "Regardless, I still mentioned in this thread that I was replacing my photos." I was pointing out another deception from Peter, who now simply states "Regardless," and now the good one, "you're obviously a troll." Oh, and don't forget the key phrase, "a very mean-spirited person."

Others who thought the story was about a woman (bold added):
Presto, post #3"She's asking for donations so she can post up a reward poster too. Haha."
Wildkow, Post #4, "she's a Doc and has to wait for a donation of $50 to post the reward poster. Please don't insult me . . . "
Windstrings, Post #7, "I think she's fishing for sucker fish, and appealing to prius owners who typically are soft hearted green thinkers. If I'm wrong.. you can sue me."
AlphaTeam, Post #12, "I mean get real, she must have half a brain."
DaveSheremata, Post #19, didn't necessarily think it was a woman, but stated, "Whoah - the perpetrator hasn't posted here - don't confuse Peter, the author of the post on PC with the author of the webpage. He's been posting here for a year according... "
DaveinOlyWA, Post #20, "bet ya the idiot will find people stupider than her who are willing to part with their money...although... so far she has received nothing...hehehe."

In Post #21, pcjr, a.k.a. Peter, admits he deceived everybody, stating "Well, I didn't want to tell people that that webpage is mine, because I wanted to remain as anonymous as possible, and frankly I'm quite embarrassed about the whole situation,"

Being a sexist, as Peter obviously is, would be embarrassing. As an observer, I would call it disgusting. To grovel for money in such a manner speaks for itself.

Quoting Peter, "How interesting, to complain about someone's flawed thinking? That will land you an admission into the locked psych ward." If Peter has such a misguided sense of reality, I would hope that the medical ethics board investigates this supposed doctor.

Quoting Peter, "How's that, Mr. Macho Apparently I Never Use Toiletry Bags Man? " I was just wondering if one of these was yours:

[attachmentid=2792]

OK, yes, just so Peter doesn't go apoplectic, this was a "stock" photo from americanbridal.com, and was intended as a bit of humor to cheer "poor Peter" up.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Salsawonder @ Apr 1 2006, 06:32 PM) [snapback]233577[/snapback]</div>

You guys could be confusing the issue..... there are "two" issues....

Life is all worth the same, but when you wear a uniform the value of your life is not changed, but when someone targets your life because of the uniform now the second issue comes into play. They are not only violating your life, but the authority of the uniform also. Killing someone who is in office to protect and serve makes the crime against all of society too.
It also states a point that anyone who could kill someone who is a police with kill with even more ease someone who is not since he has no regard for authority as well as life.

Killing a judge merits you a harsher sentence than killing me..... ... but if you kill that same judge in a car accident or the like where you had no idea he was a judge, then your sentence would be no different since you were not targeting his office.

If the police officer goes rabid and is trying to wrongfully kill you, then you are not faulted at protecting yourself, but good luck proving your case... it better be more than your word against his.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pcjr @ Apr 1 2006, 08:05 PM) [snapback]233555[/snapback]</div>

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

oh! that's a good one.

cynicism has nothing to do with success or failure, interest or lack thereof. and let's just say i'm[/] doing just fine in all the areas you mentioned above. it's your blind optimism that's preventing you from seeing the real world.

you want answers to your cynicism question... go find a 4th year phd candidate and ask them.

but hey. way to avoid the question by responding with a completely different angle of discussion. at least you're learning academic-ese...

 

Yes, Peter is good at avoiding things, such as the truth. Of course, as Peter said describing his lack of character in Post #48, "So it's easier said than done to swallow one's pride, or to take responsibility for one's actions, etc."

Let's do a bit more research.

On 7/2/2005, Peter said "I'm in the Palo Alto area in California, and my daily roundtrip commute is about 10 miles. Occassionally on the weekends I drive into San Francisco about 35 miles away. "

Now, although there is the possibility he's moved, he stated in Post #38, "The reason I had so much stuff in my car (including a toiletry bag) is that sometimes I am on call, meaning I have to work 30 hours overnight, staying at the hospital; and in fact, I had to work in the hospital Sunday morning, and I figured I would just go out for a few hours at the Mezzanine." The Mezzanine is located in San Francisco, about 35 miles away from Palo Alto where Peter lives or lived, and very close to UCSF Medical Center & UCSF Children's Hospital: Great Expectations Pregnancy Program, which is the only hospital in that area. So is this where Peter is doing his groundbreaking research on an AIDS vaccine? Or is this where "Candy" went to deliver her baby? And if "Candy" delivered her baby at the same hospital where Peter works, shouldn't he have stopped in to see her? Or did he just not bother because he had gotten all the information he needed from her already?

Also, in Post #21 Peter stated, "the only reason I went out is that I've been working 90 hours a week in my last rotation and had a day off." So what was it, a day off or working at the hospital for 30 hours????

And finally, would a patient want to see a doctor who had been working 30 hours overnight and had spent who knows how many hours prior to coming to work partying at The Mezzanine? If he still lives and works in Palo Alto you can add driving another 30 to 40 miles each way to San Francisco to go partying at The Mezzanine. Once again, another question about Peter's ethics.

 

The bottom line here is, we members of PC have pointed out the holes / flaws in Pcjr's story. We have given him our pitty & advice & our outlooks of donation scamming. Points have been made on both sides, but for some reason Pcjr continues to state that we at PC are attacking him, as stated on the AOL webpage. :huh:

Ok, here Im ATTACKING you
Pcjr, face it you have been highlighted as a person of intrest to everyone that reads this thread. And they may or may not think to themselves hmm is he telling the truth or exagerating a small situation up to be more intresting & dramatic to help him along in his quest.

I would think the point here would be drop, it lay low for a while. Don't ask for handouts/donations from PC members. No need to fire this thread back up..

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(sub3marathonman @ Apr 2 2006, 01:06 AM) [snapback]233676[/snapback]</div>

now if he has all those hours in medical rotations, which i believe since i have kept in contact with a few MD/PhDs who are now back in med school rotations to finish up the dual degree, where on earth is he getting time to do any research???

hell i'm at the bench or on pubmed or writing for usually 50ish hours a week. and i'd imagine to be testing a vaccine you'd need to be doing in vivo work, which i can tell you straight off is not a part time job. even cell culture is demanding of time, especially if you've got enough up and running to be getting any results in a timely fashion.

 

Is there a moderator in the house??!!

Someone please stick a fork in this thread because it is DONE, way way over done at that.

:wacko:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pcjr @ Apr 5 2006, 02:09 AM) [snapback]235119[/snapback]</div>

Once again, more of Peter's lack of character revealed. Of course, knowing what we do about him it shouldn't be any surprise.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pcjr @ Apr 5 2006, 02:09 AM) [snapback]235119[/snapback]</div>

And we now have more information about Peter's lack of ethics.

He finds it perfectly acceptable to drive 40 miles each way to go to The Mezzanine. He then parties there for who knows how many hours. Then he drives who knows how many miles to go to work for 30 hours straight taking care of patients in a hospital. His response is "that's the reality. Wow, where have you been?" Also, he obviously has no problem ignoring the ACGME guidelines, which he states aren't even enforced.

The real question isn't where have I been, since I'm not providing medical care for patients for 30 hours straight after spending who know how many hours partying at The Mezzanine. But wait, there's more. Check out this photo provided by The Mezzanine website:
[attachmentid=2843]

It looks like a well-stocked bar, doesn't it? So we have Peter not only partying, but are we to believe that he didn't drink while he was there? Or would that be just another one of his lies?

A SERIOUS question about his ethics.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pcjr @ Apr 5 2006, 01:38 AM) [snapback]235109[/snapback]</div>

Unfortunately Peter just can't seem to put comments in a time perspective. The statement, "I just said I wanted to stay anonymous" was not posted by Peter until long after the initial post of "Check this out" and the link to his begging website. The fact is that for whatever reason Peter did intend to deceive people, he stated that in Post #21. I am just pointing out yet another false statement and false conclusion posted by Peter.

A bit more "reassessing" also needs to be focused on the place where Peter's beloved notebook was sold.

He states on his begging website that it was at "Carl's Jr. just off Market St." Peter then writes, "I called Carl's Jr. and asked them if they have videotapes. They said they do, and that they keep the tapes for a week." Then we find out "one cop said, 'Those tapes would have not shown anything because those guys sell things just outside Carl's Jr., not inside.' I was shocked. So the cops know this is going on all the time, but they don't do anything about it?"

The really interesting thing is that "Carl's Jr." is not a pawnshop, as some people might think from reading the story. It is actually a "beer bar," at least according to "pubcrawler." "Pubcrawler is the leading beer search engine for people looking for quality beer in the United States and Canada." At least that's what they say on their website. Why that particular beer bar has been chosen by "California," the big bad burglar, to be his place to sell stolen merchandise people can only wonder.

 

Can we just give this thread a rest? Everyone is beating a very dead horse at this point.

pcjr...a word of advice. Just accept that your OP was not well received by PC and certainly the rest of your fairly defensive posts are also not well received by PC and get on with life. Life is too short to to be so wrapped up in this one, truly minor incident and misguided OP.

 

I'm glad you agree. I know that it is traumatizing to be burglarized, but sometimes its better to just get on with life. Although the car was damaged and you did lose materials things...no one lost a life and material goods can be replaced...both important things to realize.