1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

"Bell the Hybrid" - 111th Congress

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Main Forum' started by bwilson4web, Oct 17, 2009.

  1. carz89

    carz89 I study nuclear science...

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    444
    47
    0
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I suspect one reason that the data doesn't show a higher rate of blind pedestrian injuries caused by hybrids (compared to standard ICE-driven vehicles) is that the vast majority of blind pedestrians are likely to have a companion (human or canine) who are working extra hard to keep their blind friend safe. Once they have the help of the extra set of eyes or extremely keen ears, that becomes the great equalizer. The noise level produced by any particular car passing by becomes a non-factor. If the blind pedestrian ventures out without a companion, I suspect they are likely to only traverse familiar paths and use intersections that are blind-friendly (equipped with crosswalk audible signals).

    One reason that there just isn't much data (for or against) is that there is an extremely low number of blind pedestrians out there. From my own experiences, I've lived in only very large cities my whole life (Baltimore-Washington, Philly, Seattle, and San Diego, and I can count the total number of blind pedestrians I have seen on one hand.
     
  2. carz89

    carz89 I study nuclear science...

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    444
    47
    0
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Why don't the organizations and lawmakers pushing to "bell the hybrid" actually concentrate on more worthy safety causes ... such as mandating that all cars have backup rearview cameras and video screens? I don't have the raw data, but based upon the numerous stories I've read in the news about children being run over by a vehicle backing up, I suspect this would be a far more worthy cause and save far more lives than making quiet cars noisier. I think the wrong fight is being fought.

    But if they must choose to fight the quiet hybrids, where do you draw the line in determining which cars are the "quiet ones"? And where do you draw the line in determining how much noise is enough? And why apply it to only blind people? Why not the countless idiots walking the streets with headphones blasting? They can't hear any vehicles, so perhaps we should make ALL vehicles noisier! My point is that this is all unbelievable nonsense.

    Perhaps it may make more scientific sense to actually reduce the noise of all the "noisy" vehicles, so that the cumulative ambient noise out there is lower overall, thus making it easier to hear the quiet vehicles.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,557
    10,324
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Uh, how much time did you live in Seattle? I don't actually live there, yet have seen significantly more there than that.

    (No other dispute from me. My own sampling, as a hearing pedestrian, found that many non-hybrids are already so quiet that I first detect them by tire noise, not engine noise.)
     
  4. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,663
    15,663
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Japan: Subaru to demonstrate V2X based ADAS - “EyeSight +”

    This is the type of pedestrian system needed because it exceeds the limits of sound, a system that has and continues to kill too many pedestrians every year.

    Bob Wilson