1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Lithium ion/Boeing 787

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by tochatihu, Jan 18, 2013.

  1. cwerdna

    cwerdna Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    12,544
    2,123
    1
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
  2. xs650

    xs650 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    4,539
    1,433
    9
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Thanks for the article.

    From the article:
    Internally within Boeing, they may claim the subs are responsible, but outside of Boeing, Boeing is responsible for the reliability and safety of the entire aircraft. Boeing choose the sub contractors, gave the subs the requirements and accepted their work.

    Boeing is learning the hard way the bean counter mentality penny pinching during the design and test process is an expensive mistake.
     
  3. FL_Prius_Driver

    FL_Prius_Driver Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    4,319
    1,527
    0
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    I
    Same exact thought here. For the thousands of years that farming out work has been around, economic incentives have never changed. It must be an impossible lesson to learn what motivates the subcontractor when the prime is motivated by the exact same thing....$$$. (Prime - If I have the sub pay for the certification then I don't have to pay. Sub - If I have the parts maker pay for the certs, then I don't. Part Maker - If I have the material supplier pay for the certs, the I don't. Material Supplier - If I have the raw material vendor pay for certs, then I don't. Material Supplier - If I have Cleatus verify the material, I don't. Cleatus --- Smells like lithium to me. Done.)
     
    xs650 likes this.