Run Away Prius a Hoax

Yes, this one is absolutely a hoax.

For the other Prius accidents that claimed of unintended acceleration.... DMV should require a road test to renew the license for drivers over 50s. Car inspections are done annually. So why not the driver (at least once every 5 years)?

 

No need. People just need to take personal responsibility for their own actions. Accidents are inevitable - but accept them as simply that: accidents. There is no need to find fault with anyone or anything, and while blaming an inanimate object or non-personal corporation may be satisfying, it really doesn't change matters.

Drivers, like pilots, should be considered "Driver In Command". As a driver, you should take full responsibility for the actions of your vehicle including a safe outcome in the event of an operational failure.

Had the bird strike encounter resulting in a forced ditching in the Hudson come out to a different outcome, do you think the pilot would have blamed Airbus for a faulty aircraft? [Never mind the mass public, I'm talking about a pilot who understands and accepts his role as PIC]

People should have learned from that event - that in the event of an operational failure (even as unexpected as a bird strike), the operator is responsible for safely handling the situation, not the car manufacturer or anyone else (including ATC/police/911 operators).

 

Hallelujah

 

There was a comment on the article that said that putting the Prius in neutral going fast would destroy the engine. Is this valid. This is important because we have been advised by Toyota to put the car in neutral. At a relatively low 40 mph, I put my Prius in neutral with no apparent bad results. But would like this issue clarified form someone out there.

 

usbseawolf So, as I understand it you want to start taking a test every five years after you arrive at the age of fifty. I assume that you believe that your ability will start downhill rapidly at that age or if you are presently that age or older you now realize your deficiencies.

For the other Prius accidents that claimed of unintended acceleration.... DMV should require a road test to renew the license for drivers over 50s. Car inspections are done annually. So why not the driver (at least once every 5 years)?[/QUOTE]

 

No, shifting to neutral does nothing at any speed.

 

Yes, you can put it in neutral at any speed and it won't hurt anything. Simply move the shift lever to the left and hold it there for about 5 seconds. You can also shut off the car by holding down the power button for about 5 seconds. In the latter case it is a bit more difficult to steer and brake, but not as big of a difference as you might expect. It's not a very heavy car.

When I first learned to drive many many moons ago, all of us were taught how to perform these steps on the cars of that century if the car should accelerate out of control, which apparently was a more common occurrence then. I tried it myself on my 2010 Prius when I first bought it last July, just to make sure I knew how. So this is nothing new. Maybe the only difference is that drivers today don't get the level of quality in Drivers Ed that we used to.

 

I believe the previous study indicated that the age 50 was the magic number, if I recall. A new study has to be redone to determine that number.

My point is that there should be a limit. You can't assume all drivers of different age will have the same performance. Hardware (cars) are inspected but no the driver. They are missing out on the most important and error prone part of the car (driver).

P.S: I am still in my early 30s.

 

Then why does my 2009 owners manual specifically say never under any circumstances place the car in neutral or power off when the car is moving?

 

As others have posted - there is no problem in putting the Prius into neutral (or any other car under controlled conditions). Why do people not understand how the transmission works, and what are the potential problems with "N"?

FWIW, I drive a manual VW and I frequently "coast" putting the car into neutral when I'm on a downgrade and I do this even at highway speeds >65mph (easier to do this on a manual than an automatic).

If you learn the fundamental operating principles of a car including the transmission, then you will be able to quickly figure out the potential ramifications of shifting into Neutral.

Regardless, would saving the engine be a major considering as you're "rocketing down" a highway with a wide-open throttle condition?

 

I believe that's a translation issue. In some places it may be illegal to "coast" or place the car into neutral, the fear being that in an emergency you will not be able to accelerate to avoid an accident.

The only potential mechanical issue with putting the car into neutral would be the concern to over-rev the engine, and even then, with today's modern engines, that's not a real concern anymore with engine governors.

 

Duh.

-Brad

 

Forgive me for not buying into whatever Fox News has to offer - I won't believe either story until I see some corroboration...

 

While I tend to believe Sikes story is fishy, Fumento's column is equally suspect. His main premise is that you can't reach the accelerator with your hand while driving. After reading the column I went out to my car to try it and had no trouble at all. I could easily reach the pedal (and down to the firewall below the pedal) while having both eyes on the road and my left hand steering the car. I'm a little above average in height (6'-1") but far from an orangutan.

Jeff

 

You're right.

The main premise of the article should be that the brake will ALWAYS stop the car even if the accelerator is WIDE OPEN. Speaking of anything else just confuses the real impossibility of this man's claims.

-Brad