Looking at SSC 60C, there's a table by state showing the affected number of cars. This is the first info I've seen seeing a multi-year summary of actual Prius locations. It also shows where they actually wound up regardless of where they were bought It covers all 2004 through early 2006 cars. It's in PDF format and I can't figure out how to copy it here, but it's on Page 3. Going down, transcribing - (Anyone want to calculate by Population Density?) State # CA 49640 VA 7906 FL 7470 NY 7039 WA 6859 TX 6673 PA 5893 IL 5658 MA 5366 MD 5111 OR 4355 NJ 3979 CO 3976 NC 3678 AZ 3602 OH 3532 WI 3011 MI 2736 MN 2577 GA 2294 CT 2255 IN 2008 MO 1680 TN 1526 NV 1473 NM 1355 NH 1238 UT 1167 ME 1157 AL 971 KY 960 IA 930 SC 926 KS 870 LA 854 OK 755 RI 727 ID 694 AR 685 VT 679 DC 615 DE 584 WV 576 MT 525 NE 453 MS 410 WY 312 AK 219 SD 208 ND 117
Yuck, can't figure out how to format this properly, but here you go. Population figures are the 2005 estimate from the U.S. Census Bureau. Code: State    Prius        Population    Prius per 1000 people CA    49,640        36,132,147        1.37 OR    4,355        3,641,056        1.20 DC      615          550,521        1.12 WA    6,859        6,287,759        1.09 VT      679          623,050        1.09 VA    7,906        7,567,465        1.04 NH    1,238        1,309,940        0.95 MD    5,111        5,600,388        0.91 ME    1,157        1,321,505        0.88 CO    3,976        4,665,177        0.85 MA    5,366        6,398,743        0.84 NM    1,355        1,928,384        0.70 DE      584          843,524        0.69 RI      727        1,076,189        0.68 CT    2,255        3,510,297        0.64 WY      312          509,294        0.61 NV    1,473        2,414,807        0.61 AZ    3,602        5,939,292        0.61 MT      525          935,670        0.56 WI    3,011        5,536,201        0.54 MN    2,577        5,132,799        0.50 ID      694        1,429,096        0.49 PA    5,893        12,429,616        0.47 UT    1,167        2,469,585        0.47 NJ    3,979        8,717,925        0.46 IL    5,658        12,763,371        0.44 NC    3,678        8,683,242        0.42 FL    7,470        17,789,864        0.42 NY    7,039        19,254,630        0.37 AK      219          663,661        0.33 IN    2,008        6,271,973        0.32 WV      576        1,816,856        0.32 KS      870        2,744,687        0.32 IA      930        2,966,334        0.31 OH    3,532        11,464,042        0.31 TX    6,673        22,859,968        0.29 MO    1,680        5,800,310        0.29 MI    2,736        10,120,860        0.27 SD      208          775,933        0.27 NE      453        1,758,787        0.26 TN    1,526        5,962,959        0.26 GA    2,294        9,072,576        0.25 AR      685        2,779,154        0.25 KY      960        4,173,405        0.23 SC      926        4,255,083        0.22 AL      971        4,557,808        0.21 OK      755        3,547,884        0.21 LA      854        4,523,628        0.19 ND      117          636,677        0.18 MS      410        2,921,088        0.14
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Tempus @ Jun 15 2006, 09:07 AM) [snapback]271583[/snapback]</div> Wow, Pennyslvania is among the top ten. I would never have guessed that. Hurray for us!
Yes and California the top- not a surprise. With the Carpool sticker and higher than other states gas prices,,,,By the way just had our 05 done yesterday...SSC 60C
Here's a quickie map-graphic. I chose to break the per-1000 ownership data into four groups: CA-MA, then NM-AZ, then MT-FL, then all the rest, which taper off smoothly without any noticeable breakpoints. Excuse the quality; I just snagged a US map from google images and slapped in four colors. Brightest (lightest) green is the highest ownership group, yellow is next, then dark green. Uncolored states are in the bottom group. (Some dark green states have speckling, but that was just an editing artifact.) There are a couple of points to remember when viewing a map like this, however: 1) The Midwest may still be a stronghold of American-car purchasers, so Toyota won't be well-represented there; 2) Though the data is normalized for state population, the sheer size of some states will over- or understate their importance in the image. (For example, Wyoming is a huge yellow slab, but its population is much lower than, say, New Jersey. Thus its large yellow color area overstates its "yellowness.")
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rick Auricchio @ Jun 15 2006, 03:42 PM) [snapback]271827[/snapback]</div> Now how about somebody checking to see who would win the next Presidentual race between the lt/dk green states and the white/yellow....Then send the results to both party headquarters and maybe we will get some much needed enviromental laws and incentives..
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(B Rad @ Jun 15 2006, 06:57 PM) [snapback]271883[/snapback]</div> it's the 2004 election, but it does give a good fit. http://www.electoral-vote.com/ better maps, but harder to see how it fits, except maybe the last map. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/