1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

HSI details

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Technical Discussion' started by hobbit, Aug 1, 2009.

  1. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I need some community help on a new document: Tao of HSI
    .
    Since my time at the helm of the 2010 is somewhat limited and I'm not
    planning on buying one any time soon, I can't verify a few things myself
    but as I was driving those of a couple of other new owners, I noticed quite
    a few parallels to the states I see in my own '04 with the additional
    instruments. So it seems like we need an official "proper use of the
    HSI" document available to everyone since there could be a lot of good
    information behind its simple status bar.
    .
    Post feedback here so we can all see the development process, and I'll
    try to do timely updates.
    .
    _H*
     
    12 people like this.
  2. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I've updated this file a bit, added a shot of the owner's manual
    proving how Toyota acknowledges the existence of pulse & glide,
    and thrown in Ken1784's suggested operation regions as well. Still
    need some verification of various facts/parameters from actual
    owners of the 2010, please. They're in bold, marked with XXX.
    .
    _H*
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. cpatch

    cpatch New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    383
    81
    0
    Location:
    Carlsbad, CA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Haven't tested mine enough to help you out with the XXX facts, but one thing I've noticed that you don't mention is that the center line is "sticky"...there is a little bit of play in the accelerator once the center line is hit before the bar moves to the right and the engine lights.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,557
    10,324
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    From Hobbit's page:

    Coming from a guzzling Subaru, it is very pleasant to see ScanGauge showing low RPM and high manifold pressure while operating in this green zone, indicating much reduced pumping loss.

    I've been dropping into the lower Red zone too much and seeing the manifold pressure fall, indicating the return of pumping losses. At least RPM is very low. This seems to be a hint that I should be breaking into Pulse & Glide, at least at speeds where Stealth is available. More practice is needed.

    Will try to test and report back at the end of the week, if no one else has done so by then. But if it gets significantly higher than Gen2, I'll wimp out.

    I wasn't able to confirm this, at least while sitting in the driveway. More detail in my next report.

    My foot has adapted to leaving this mode engaged permanently. I leave it on partly to cover the rough spots in my style, partly to gain the more efficient AC mode, partly to make cruise control (when I'm lazy) less aggressive. Most full time Gen3 drivers are likely to similarly adapt, though it should be turned off for test drives by folks accustomed to "vroom vroom".

    For shorter and shallower hills, where the 'fake engine drag' regeneration is not enough to prevent undesired acceleration but B is too much, I've taken to temporarily setting Cruise Control to increase regeneration to hold the car at a constant speed. This is very effective, until the traction battery fills, at which point the ICE starts whining as a high powered vacuum cleaner (high RPM and strong manifold vacuum) for real engine braking.

    The thread that first mentioned this suggested that it is a new feature in Gen3.
     
    2 people like this.
  5. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Will this help?

    Near as I can tell, the HSI is a simple power requested indicator. One of the interesting but seldom used data points the Graham Mini-scanner reports is 'requested power.' My testing suggests the HSI behaves like a 'requested power meter.'

    Bob Wilson
     
    2 people like this.
  6. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,557
    10,324
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I was able to test a few things on a road trip the past few days.

    From Hobbit's "Tao of Hsi":
    Confirmed. It worked fine for me this afternoon, on each of several tries.

    Regarding HSI display ECO area:
    Unfortunately, the nearly ideal road section for this test, a known level section along a reservoir, had potential witnesses, so no go. I did try it in twice on other stretches, aborting both runs at 79 mph without having reached a steady speed. Unfortunately the GPS betrayed 25-30 foot descents.

    Max RPM while still in this ECO area varies with speed -- 1660 rpm at slow street speed of about 20-25 mph, about 2400 rpm at 60 mph, and a solid 3200 rpm at 79 mph.

    This trip included descending 6 mountain grades long enough to completely fill the traction battery on regeneration (CC and B modes) and automatically revert to pure compression braking, spinning up as high as 4700 rpm. If doing it again, I'd keep track of how much elevation loss was thrown away without regeneration, but it was almost certainly more than 5000 feet. That represents about a half gallon of gas spent climbing that could not be recovered by later downhill glides or regenerations. Despite this loss, mpg was 58.8 (displayed) or 57.2 (simple pump calculation) or 56.0 (pump including slight overfill on previous refill).
     
    3 people like this.
  7. royrose

    royrose Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    1,389
    951
    4
    Location:
    Foot of Pikes Peak
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    Limited
    Hobbit,

    I don't have my Prius yet, 20 days and counting, but I found your Tao of HSI to be very informative.

    Could you please clarify your statement "As always, working engine-run times into upcoming road elevation changes generally gives the best results"? I think I have a general idea of what you are talking about, but some more specifics would help.

    I am sure that you are right that pressing the ECO mode button brings up the HSI scree. When we did a test drive, I engaged ECO mode and the HSI screen popped up. The salesman was completely surprised.

    Thanks.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. a priori

    a priori Canonus Curiosus

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    3,083
    407
    23
    Location:
    Chicagoland (West)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    I'd agree with the "sticky" concept at the center line (when it exists) on the HSI. This was one of the first things I noticed after driving my new 2010, and I commented on it through this thread: [​IMG] Got the "Feel" of the HV/ICE Line!.

    One benefit of the HSI is that you can see whether your demand/draw on or from the HV battery/electric motor(s) is too high to justify keeping the car in EV.
     
  9. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Cool, thanks for the additional bits of input. I've updated
    the file again, adding a section near the end all about the mode
    buttons as I've seen a bit of confusion about them in some other
    threads already.
    .
    I've removed a couple of the "XXX:" questions as they've been
    answered [and confirmed the "ECO brings up HSI" thing myself too
    at the Cincy meeting last weekend], but now have a couple of
    different questions! Look again for "XXX" in the 090809 version.
    .
    I'm leaving the "terminal speed on windless flat" thing open for
    now even though fuzzy's observations are really useful; the high
    end sounds like it's *awfully* fast on the road and I'm more curious
    what the result is by staying just shy of where the right-half
    tapers off into the upward final triangle. I suppose expecting
    a faster efficient highway cruise is reasonable, since with the
    bigger engine and "earlier" BSFC curves it's clear that Toyota's
    going up against the "autobahn cruiser" market or whatever.
    .
    The downhill behavior, going to more engine-braking automatically
    regardless of "B" or "D", is exactly like the second-gen behavior.
    Nice to hear of other people seeing the same thing, and it really
    does take some of those big descents to be able to study it.
    .
    _H*
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,557
    10,324
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Definitely leave this open, as I found only the neighborhood of the answer, not the actual answer. Though it is probably in the low 80s, I did have the bar well into the triangle, almost to the point where the ECO label turns off, and the road was providing a slightly gravity assist. The descent was visible only on the GPS, not visually from the terrain, but Prius certainly makes good use of gravity when it is available.

    No wind was seen, but the very low vegetation was not good for displaying it.
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. Philosophe

    Philosophe 2010 Prius owner

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    437
    72
    1
    Location:
    Montréal, Québec (Canada)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Hobbit,

    Please see a post I made in another thread.

    This comes only from observation and I cannot confirm this with technical information.

    If it can be of any use, although it brings more questions than answers!
     
  12. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Yup, I did read that other thread and was hoping I could get
    everyone working toward filling in a lot of the blanks you put
    into it. I took special note of your engine re-light spec when
    in warp-stealth at high speed; this sounds entirely reasonable
    and matches what we see in the second-gen cars, and is also
    quite SOC-dependent. I'll bet that sufficient warp-stealthing
    would run the SOC so far down that it would re-light anywhere
    above the null point between CHG and the EV-area, just like my
    own car after I've WSed a long downhill pulling ~ 10A from the
    battery most of the way.
    .
    _H*
     
  13. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Using the following display points:
    [​IMG]
    The 75% point is marked with the right-most yellow tape. The camera parallax error is due to the cover being displaced from the active display. The right-most yellow tape looks to be at the 75% point from the driver seat.

    The values I get for energy on a hill climb using a Garmin nuvi GPS to record velocity and altitude are:
    [​IMG]
    Notes:

    • at 100% Eco, the speed was ~35 mph, 72F
    • at 75% Eco, the speed was ~25 mph, 72F
    • holding a constant power setting while driving is distracting
    Bob Wilson
     
  14. meannotgreen

    meannotgreen New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    33
    3
    0
    Location:
    UK
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A

    [​IMG]

    (Image courtesy of Hobbitt)
    Don't know if this helps - on what I believe is windless flat and anyway same result in both directions - by holding the HSI actually very slightly below what the image indicates I ran out of road at 90 and had to back off. It may have been my imagination but from just over 80 the rate of acceleration seemed to increase noticeably - could the aerodynamics be working better over 80?
    (My car is a base UK model T3 with 15" wheels)
     
  15. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Do you have a portable GPS, like a Garmin nuvi? If you have a Garmin, I can share a Perl program to convert the trace data into an Excel compatible spreadsheet and then we can analyze the data. But to answer your question.

    Yes, there are non-linear, aerodynamic effects including a local peak drag that then falls off. It is possible to reach a 'terminal velocity' and then descend a small hill and emerge 'on the other side.' You'd be able to sustain that speed unless you went too slow and then the local drag spike would decellerate to the 'slow speed.'

    I have on stretch that I've reached 100 mph before in my NHW11 (2003 Prius.) I may try a maximum acceleration test with the GPS and we'll see what happens:
    [​IMG]

    Bob Wilson
     
  16. Philosophe

    Philosophe 2010 Prius owner

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    437
    72
    1
    Location:
    Montréal, Québec (Canada)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    If I may: what is "spark" in the graph? :confused:
     
  17. meannotgreen

    meannotgreen New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    33
    3
    0
    Location:
    UK
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Regret no, not yet.

    It did feel like that I think, but I'll need to try it some more times and on different roads to be sure.
    Will be interesting to see too if anybody else notices it.

    I found it anyway when googling for garmin nuvi's!

    I can see this leading me to wind the Linux up again.
     
  18. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    That is the spark advance. Back then, there was a lot of buzz about using spark advance as a way to detect efficient engine operating regions. It was easy enough to record it and the dip was curious but nothing that really 'sparked' my interest.

    In this test, I had force-charged the traction battery and then pulled out on the test area. The engine was off until I floored the accelerator and held it there until the end of the test.

    The spark advance change was curious but of brief duration. I didn't see anything worth pursuing in that line. The reason is I soon began to look at energy flows, the power consumed by drag and inertia versus the power provided by the ICE augmented by the traction battery.

    To make any use of the spark or valve or throttle advance, I would be building a model of a very sophisticated engine, the 1.6L. As interesting as that might be, I'm more interested in systems, the total vehicle performance. It is the way my mind works.

    Bob Wilson
     
  19. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    *90* MPH at the higher side of the engine area?! Yow. Maybe the truly
    "sweet" doesn't go quite that high, or the range shifts around with
    car speed [that wouldn't be a surprise]. That's two pieces of
    reported evidence on the high side results now.
    .
    What HSI setting does it take, for example, to creep slowly up to
    70 MPH and hold it on the flat? That would be a good comparison
    guideline to the second-gen.
    .
    I could cast around for Boston-area owners willing to get together
    and experiment, but I haven't even *seen* a third-gen in the wild
    around here at all yet. My first sighting aside from Hybridfest
    was in *Ohio* a few days ago. Then again I've been out of town a
    bit over the last few weeks..
    .
    Based on some comments over at cleanmpg, I added an additional note
    on how the low end of the ICE area likely provides least-fuel-used
    acceleration but may not be compatible with surrounding traffic.
    I try to do this in my '04, too, and it seems to work well even at
    really low-lugging RPMs off the bottom that slowly shift upward to
    1500ish as speed builds. It's wikkid fun when one has the space to
    do that on downsloped interstate on-ramps, getting back up to speed
    with no visible blip in MPG average.
    .
    _H*
     
  20. meannotgreen

    meannotgreen New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    33
    3
    0
    Location:
    UK
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I've now got a Garmin and that's showing that my speedo is about 4mph optimistic so for 90 read 86.
    When I get the chance will try again and check the road is level.