Bush puts the "Lame" in Lame Duck

:frusty:

 

Really ..... did you expect anything different from Cheney (erh ... I mean the Bush admin)? These are the same people who claim to be all about Jesus - then they start an oil war that kills hundreds of thousands of his people.

Screwing the environment for profit is par for the course, and is to be expected from this group of crooks and killers.

Maybe Joe (really Sam) the plumber (not a real plumber) who bitches about paying his taxes (he doesn't pay any now) will come to save the day!

... Brad

 

Agree with you on the derg, but.

If elected it will be the Joe the VP, I mean Obama administration. Now your talking way out there.

 

GWB just doing everything he can to ensure his legacy as the Worst. President. Ever.™

 

Typical. If the last 8 years has taught us anything it's that deregulation is the answer.

 

Levine vs. Wyeth.

Levine, a musician, lost her arm. Wyeth didn't lable drug "don't use IV push". FDA labeling involved. It's going to the Supremes. Another "deregulation" thing trying to obstruct consumers from being able to sue for damages.

 

Thank you Tony for your ever enlightening observation.

Y-A-W-N... Uh huh... Typical banter at the end of EVERY presidency...
And pretty much the same blabber in the US as in every country too when the reigning leadership is on the way out.

Soon our new messiah, your choice, whether it be McCain or Obama, will fix ALL our problems no matter natural, man made, or perceived man made. Everyone will be rich, everyone will have free health care, global warming and/or climate change will be fixed, Muslims, Jews, Christians, and non believers will worship together and marry each other... Yes, Utopia at last!!

Rick
#4 2006
Thread: Bush puts the "Lame" in Lame Duck

 

Just because it is common doesn't make it right.

Tom

 

Who is to say if it is right or wrong? Obama is the wrong person for the job for many and McCain is the wrong person for the job for many. So who is right and who is wrong? Some prefer regulation (governmental interference) and others prefer less regulation (less governmental intrusions). Is one more right or wrong than the other?

A blanket statement from Tony implying Bush is more lame than other lame duck presidents and and another stating that Bush is "the worst president EVER" is old hat and sour grapes.

I stand by my original conclusion. There will always be those who complain and gripe the outgoing president is the "worst ever" president ever to serve. I have seen it for every president for the last five decades of my life, I surely believe it has been the case since Washington, and I am sure it will continue again and again.

Rick
#4 2006

 

I said he was the Worst. President. Ever.™

I'm not the only one who thinks so. Earlier this year, they took a poll and GWB was voted as the Worst President Ever by 61% of the historians polled.

http://priuschat.com/forums/freds-h...ush-presidency-failure-61-say-worst-ever.html

I'm not a historian, but I'm definitely in the 98% that thinks his Presidency is a failure.

 

I thought this site was for prius chat and not political garbage. We should use it this way.

 

We were discussing comments about lame duck presidents, not the current candidates. You "yawned" because it is the same shtick every time, with people complaining about the abuses of the outgoing administration. My comment was that just because the abuses are common, it doesn't make them right.

I made no comment about McCain or Obama, and I ask you not to pretend that I did.

Tom

 

That's why we have Fred's House of Politics, which I avoid like the plague.

Tom

 

Nope. Priuschat is for a wide range of issues. From the Prius itself, to politics, to the environment.

Let me give you a hint on how to avoid these threads if you wish. Look at the subject and if you see a title such as the one for this thread "Bush puts the "Lame" in Lame Duck", then I trust you are of the intelligence to surmise, "Gee, this thread is not about the Prius so maybe I will not read it"...

Rick
#4 2006

 

Sorry Tony. Your title to this thread you started was "Bush puts the "Lame" in Lame Duck". You then mentioned the White House, the last eight years, and invoked Bush twice in your original post. You clearly, crystal clearly, put the blame for all you current environmental gripes on Bush and his administration.

And you claim it has nothing to do with politics. Uh huh...

Yes, clearly not political at all...

Rick
#4 2006

 

Yet another indictment of our current morally bankrupt Moron in Chief. Because he has to ensure his legacy even if it is as the Worst President ever. Got to make sure there is no chance anyone will outdo him for worst.

I have never held a U.S. President in such contempt and disgust. Not even Reagan. Not even Nixon.

 

With the rules left over from the Clinton administration, the Clinton had implemented them too close to the end of his term (i.e, within 30 days or something like that). That made it easy for the Bush administration to simply strip them away -- they were still within some kind of grace period where they weren't final.

What Bush is doing is writing his rules before he falls into that grace period. For Bush, getting rid of Clinton's last rules was like brushing bread crumbs off a table. For Obama, getting rid of Bush's will be more like pulling teeth.