1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

03 Prius intermittent engine stumble as if it's trying to start

Discussion in 'Generation 1 Prius Discussion' started by trickedout281, May 13, 2013.

  1. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Hello fellow Prius owners. Great forum! I have an issue with my 2003 Prius that I can't figure out. Maybe someone on here has experienced this. I think it might be an ECU calibration issue. I don't have a Toyota scanner :( so there isn't anything I can do about reprogramming the ECU to the latest calibration. Is there an ECU calibration update/s or updated replacement ECU to fix my issue listed below?

    Ready mode, after driving 10 miles or so, engine warmed up, at a stop (engine off/Ready). The engine feels like it's attempting to start and stumbles once. After a few seconds pass it stumbles again and repeats a few more times. The stumble resembles the exact moment of a slight misfire in a running engine. There are no warning lights nor MIL/DTCs when this problem occurs.

    In the past I have retrieved pending P0300 (random misfire detected), p0301, p0303 etc. when scanning the computer to check on things. I have never felt a misfire while the engine is idling or under load.

    I bought the car with 118,000 miles on it.

    Service history: I was a Ford/ASE certified mechanic for 8 years. I perform all of the work myself. 20k miles ago I replaced the spark plugs with NGKs (set gaps to OEM spec) for routine maintenance. The old plugs looked in almost new condition. New 12v battery, Optima Yellow Top with conversion kit. Replaced transmission fluid with proper toyota OEM spec fluid, cleaned the pick up screen and magnet. Properly cleaned/oiled K&N air filter. Replaced inverter coolant, coolant pump with the updated part due to no coolant flow, DTCs, and following the TSB. I replace the engine coolant once a year. Regularly change the engine oil and filter with 5w30 oil, making sure not to over fill the crankcase. I had the dealer perform the steering shaft bolt recall.

    Previous owner service history. They had the D/S front wheel bearing replaced, and the catalytic converter and oxygen sensor replaced under warranty. They were in a minor front end collision and the radiator, condenser, core support etc. were all replaced. I found a damaged radiator hose neglected to be replaced after the accident. The hose was gouged slightly from the drive belt rubbing on it from being pushed into the belt.

    I usually run 87 octane from Sunoco. Last tank of gas I added a bottle of Techron fuel system cleaner before fill up. I just performed a fuel injector cleaning with my OTC specialty tool using 50% Seafoam 50% 87 octane fuel. Tested fuel pressure at time of service 48psi. Regularly clean the throttle body. Just performed an induction cleaning 1/3 pint Seafoam using OTC tool to central intake vacuum inlet.

    I did all of the cleaning services for preventative maintenance. With higher mileage and no replaceable inline fuel filter. Why did Toyota not install a serviceable inline fuel filter on this model Prius? Has anyone fitted an inline fuel filter to their Prius? I'm considering doing this either in the engine compartment just in front of the fuel rail or near the tank.

    My driving is low mileage short trips usually under 10 miles round trip per day. The MPG has dropped from the mid 40s to mid to upper 30s. Because of my low mileage city driving I'm concerned about excessive carbon build up. This is the main reason I did all of the cleaning services recently. I can't figure out why the fuel economy has declined so much.

    Does anyone have experience and or information with adjusting the valves on this engine, and at what mileage it should be performed? I'd like to get the Toyota service manual instructions for this procedure if possible. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks to everyone in advance.

    Below is some information about my Pruis that may help with determining ECU calibration version, diagnosis and or replacement parts.

    Current Mileage: 175,300
    I believe it's the original engine, transmission, inverter, and Hybrid battery.

    Door Jamb Label Info:
    10/02 Prius
    VIN: JT2BK18U13007727
    No 661
    Model: NHW11L-AEEEBA
    C/TR: 1C5/FC95
    A/TM: 01A/P111

    Behind Glove Box Engine Control Label Info:
    175300-5060 12V
    89661-47054
    1NZ-FXE

    Under Hood Engine Label Info:
    3TYXV01.5LH1
    21080
    15V1GLHE
    1NZ-FXE
     
  2. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Because they happen with the car somewhat 'warm', beyond the open-loop period, these hypothesis jump out:
    • sticky throttle plate - normally occurs on a cold start but nothing says it has to be cold. As the car warms, the throttle body dimensions might change enough to lead to a problem.
    • noisy throttle sensor - the throttle plate sensor is similar to other variable resistance encoders that develop problems over time (probably tin whiskers). Good Prius Friend Hobbit has a description of the tear-down and maintenance.
    • dirty MAF sensor - for a warmed engine, this would be one of those easy (cheap) to clean
    I do suggest getting a Prius-aware scanner (search the forum for ideas.) The control computers have a lot of good diagnostic information and can provide an excellent road-map.

    I would be interested in looking at the short-term and long-term fuel trim behavior. A Prius-aware scanner will also show the throttle position. I'll try to capture some data with a miniVCI to see if I can share normal operation.

    Bob Wilson

    ps. There are no known firmware mods to any of the ECUs. They are field-swappable and there was an earlier TIS about trouble starting that involved changing the engine ECU. I don't have the details, just remember the buzz about the same time I came up with the throttle body cleaning write-up.
     
  3. Patrick Wong

    Patrick Wong DIY Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    18,200
    6,482
    0
    Location:
    Green Valley, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Because the K&N air filter sits above the mass air flow sensor, it is possible that oil may drip down from the filter and contaminate the MAF sensor. Hence I recommend that you clean the sensor if this was not recently done.

    The fuel filter is located within the fuel tank and is not separately replaceable.

    The valves are adjusted by removing the camshafts and replacing shims. A painful experience. Not too many owners bother to have this done.

    Techinfo.toyota.com is a subscription website where you can obtain repair manual info.

    You have the most recent engine ECU, hence there are no updates available.

    I agree with your suggestions.

    The TSB suggested that engine no-start or low power issues could potentially be resolved by upgrading the engine ECU to the version in the OP's car. A later TSB suggested that throttle body cleaning be tried, certainly a less costly procedure for Toyota.
     
  4. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Hello Bob,

    Thank you very much for your quick reply, valuable information, and suggestions. Early Tuesday morning I inspected the throttle plate by hand for a sticking condition with the engine cold and warm. It was about 50°F outside. The throttle plate moved freely in both cold/warm conditions. I cleaned the throttle body last Sunday along with performing the fuel injector, and induction services. The problem remained, however after the servicing and additional driving it does seems less pronounced.

    I checked again for pending codes with my INNOVA 3130 scan tool. There were no DTCs. During my test drive I monitored the live data/pid values that were available. I noticed during certain times at idle there was a 50°F difference between the IAT and the ambient air temperature (111°F IAT, 61° ambient). I expect the IAT to be warmer than ambient but that much of an increase seems to be on the high side. Is this a normal characteristic for the Prius? I'm interested to compare this reading with yours to see if it's similar. I duplicated the concern once, but it was a less harsh set of random stumbles.

    According to my scanner the ECU goes into open loop each time it turns off the engine. During these conditions: (Ready) mode, engine off, while in Drive, I monitored the pid values for any readings that indicated the ECU was attempting to start the engine. Unfortunately when I felt the attempted engine start/stumble there were no changes in the pid values.

    I inspected the IAT sensor element. It was covered with a thin layer of black carbon/dirt. I cleaned it with isopropyl alcohol soaked q-tips followed up with mass air flow sensor cleaner. It now looks good as new. I definitely overlooked cleaning the MAF sensor. I didn't find any oil contamination on either of the two MAF elements. I cleaned the MAF sensor and connector pins. Thank you both for bringing this to my attention.

    I read over both of the guides you linked me to. Afterwards I cleaned the throttle plate again (engine off) with MAF sensor positioned to the side. This time focusing the spray solvent around the pivot points while moving the throttle plate. I followed up with lightly oiling the pivots. I inspected all of the throttle body vacuum inlets for clogs. They were all open. I cleaned them anyways with solvent and a brush just to be thorough.

    The before/after MAF pid values didn't seem to be affected much by cleaning the MAF sensor. This doesn't mean it didn't resolve the issue though. The drivability has improved slightly upon cleaning both the IAT sensor and MAF sensor. Below are my recorded pid values in "Ready" mode.

    Shifter in Drive, AC off: Open loop, Eng RPM 0, vehicle speed 0 MPH, spark advance 5°, ECT 183°F, IAT 91°F, ambient 56°F (display), MAF lb/min 0.009, TPS 14.1%, STFT 0, LTFT 8.5%

    Shifter in Drive, AC off: Closed loop, Eng RPM (1180-1213), vehicle speed 0 MPH, Spark Advance 17°, STFT (1.5-8.5%), TPS 15.2%, ECT 188°F, IAT 91°F, Ambient 56°F, MAF lb/min (0.457-0.511), 02S B1 S1 (0.020- 0.800V), 02s B1 S2 (0.810-0.855V)

    Shifter in Park, AC on (compressor cycling on/off): Fuel sys CL, Eng RPM (960-1218), ECT 188°F, IAT 91°F, Ambient 56°F, MAF lb/min (0.244-0.621), STFT (1.5-8.5%), LTFT 8.5%

    Shifter in Drive, AC on (compressor cycling on/off): Fuel sys CL, Eng RPM (1185-1236), vehicle speed 0 MPH, ECT 188°F, IAT 100°F, Ambient 56°F, MAF lb/min (0.383-0.563), STFT (1.5-8.5%), LTFT 8.5%

    I have sense driven the vehicle several times for about 30 minutes each trip. I couldn't re-duplicate the concern. I'd love to say that it's fixed, but it's too soon to say for certain. The concern has always been intermittent. It usually happens while sitting in traffic, so I believe it is or was temperature related.

    I'm going to perform more test driving before removing the throttle body and TPS for servicing (following Hobbits guide). I'm trying to do one repair attempt at a time to see what fixes the issue. I have a good feeling that cleaning the MAF sensor will at the very least improve my fuel economy once the ECU has relearned.

    Bob, If you get a chance to record and post your pid values under similar conditions for reference I'd greatly appreciate it. Unfortunately I don't have the Prius factory service manual as of yet to reference pid specs. I'm going to attempt to capture/record the pid frames with my scanner during future driving.

    Thank you both for your wisdom and assistance. I appreciate your excellent write-up. I'd also like to thank Hobbit for his write-up. They were both helpful.

    I knew that Toyota had put some type of fuel filter located in the Prius tank. Every fuel pump I have ever replaced had an in tank filter connected to the pump along with a replaceable in line fuel filter. Does the Prius have the same sock type filter that most vehicles have attached to the pump, or is it of better design and quality? If it's the same cheap type, I'm going install a replaceable inline filter. I'd like to protect my fuel injectors from clogging and having poor spray patterns.
     
  5. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    First off, thank you for dropping in. It is always a pleasure to have someone visit with a technical background.

    I have to replace a keyboard on my OBD laptop. With luck, I'll get some data this morning to share.

    Bob Wilson
     
  6. ChapmanF

    ChapmanF Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    24,912
    16,216
    0
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    As one data point on valve adjustment anyway, I went into mine late last year at about 200,000 miles just to measure the clearances and found ten within tolerance (verging on the tight side) and six grown tight enough to be just outside of tolerance.

    (I checked with a dial indicator while moving lifters up and down with a magnet-on-a-stick, which seems more repeatable than feeler gauges, but I suppose it's possible the factory specs are given for feeler gauges and might build in an allowance for feelers giving a slightly larger reading. Could be a good question for an "old timer" machinist. If that's the case then it's possible I've got nothing out of spec at all.)

    The only work I did was measurement, not adjustment, so I did not have to get into removing cams (or even trying to get the chain-tensioner cover plug out of the chain cover, though I checked to make sure I can at least jockey an 8mm hex bit into it if I don't mind shedding a little blood). I probably avoided something like half the work that would go into actual adjustment, and still managed to spend several hours.

    -Chap
     
  7. Patrick Wong

    Patrick Wong DIY Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    18,200
    6,482
    0
    Location:
    Green Valley, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    I agree with the concept of spending several hours, I also removed the valve cover and measured valve clearances on my 2001, using a feeler gauge several years ago.
     
  8. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Bob,
    Thank you. Good luck with your laptop repair.

    Hello Chap,
    Thank you for the additional info on valve clearances. It almost sounds like I shouldn't even bother checking clearances if your tolerances were mostly within spec at 200k. There are so many variables though from one engine to the next. The Prius engine obviously experiences less wear and tear than a non hybrid vehicle without having to idle so much and the lower RPM range. I wonder how long I can make this car last.

    Years ago when working at a Ford dealership I recall using feeler gauges to measure OHC/DOHC valve clearances. I'm sure a good dial indicator set up works too. Checking valve clearances was not an every day task though. Once I get my hands on a service manual I'll likely use whatever method they recommend.

    Hi Patrick,
    Were your valve clearances within spec? Do you recall the approximate mileage on the engine?

    I remember reading in some Toyota Prius manual that a basic preliminary inspection for valve clearance was (Listen to the engine at idle for a noisy valve train, and also to inspect for a rough idle.) If neither of those were an issue, no valve adjustments were needed.

    I personally don't feel confident checking things this way. Maybe this is Toyota's method for warning us that the valve adjustment procedure on this particular engine is very involved, and best to avoid unless required for repair.

    My valve train doesn't sound particularly noisy but it isn't exactly quiet either. The engine idle is fairly smooth for its mileage. This is one of those times it would be helpful to have another Prius that's known to be within specs for comparison. If I remove the valve cover to check I'll likely end up having to special order the correct thickness shims along with whatever else is needed to complete the job. Sounds like there would be at least a few days of down time for parts. I'll have to plan this project ahead of time.
     
  9. Patrick Wong

    Patrick Wong DIY Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    18,200
    6,482
    0
    Location:
    Green Valley, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Some of my valve clearances were looser than spec. Odometer reading probably around 70K miles at the time. The Prius engine sounds like a sewing machine at idle speed.

    I agree that this project requires advance planning and scheduled downtime since the shims need to be ordered after you figure out what valves need to be adjusted.
     
  10. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    See if this will do on format. Recorded using miniVCI with Chinese hacked TechStream. There are data gaps because the software records for a bit and then asks for manual inputs. I just double checked and a lot is missing. I'll try again later.

    Bob Wilson
     

    Attached Files:

  11. ChapmanF

    ChapmanF Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    24,912
    16,216
    0
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Another thing to consider is this engine doesn't really use separate shims under lifter buckets. It uses one-piece buckets machined to different thicknesses, and these are something like $18 apiece from Toyota (I haven't checked third-party availability or price). Depending on how many of these you buy you can get halfway to the price of a low-mileage used engine, just in lifters alone.

    I am not sure of the implications of mixing old and new lifters. Some things I've read have dire warnings about replacing lifters except in sets; others have dire warnings about reusing lifters except in the same positions. The most economical adjustment might be to measure all the lifters and reorder them so they're all where they best fit, buying new ones only where no old one would make tolerance. But that would violate both dire warnings. The thing is, I've never really had anybody sit me down and teach me the engineering reasons behind the dire warnings, so it's all partly magic to me.

    My dealer quoted me $800 for valve adjustment and, after my own experience of just part of the process, I will not accuse them of inflating that price. Needless to say, that's more than a low-mileage used engine.

    After getting the valve cover off, which is a chore in itself, there's a plug on the front of the chain cover that has to be removed for access to the tensioner release. It takes an 8mm hex bit which I was able after a few tries to get into the plug, through a space just the thickness of my hand between cover and fender. I wasn't kidding about the blood. I never even tried whether I could get a wrench on the bit once the bit was in place. Some have reported the plug being stubborn enough to present a risk of stripping the hex. If it does come out, the next step requires both holding up a lever and poking a wire through holes beneath it to lock it in that position. These two motions somehow have to be completed together through a small round hole that's hard to see or reach. I haven't even daydreamed about how to actually accomplish that yet. I wouldn't be surprised if somebody told me it was easier to pull the engine to do the job.

    -Chap
     
  12. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Bob, thank you for the recording. I noticed that recording was for your 2010 Prius. The next time you get a chance could you please take a recording using your 2003 Prius under the following conditions: normal engine operating temperature, gear selector in Drive, engine idle, 0 mph, AC on or heat on (to keep the engine at idle). Just let me know wether you turned on the AC or heat so I know how to compare the results. The conditions are important because it's when I experience the issue.

    Chap, thank you for the details. I already have a few bloody knuckles from removing the wiring harness to access the PCV valve today. The last clip on the plastic wiring harness cover did not want to release. I inspected the throttle body after test driving it and the underside of the throttle plate already had engine oil baked on it. I haven't noticed this before. I understand some oil residue in the intake is normal but this seems a bit much. Seeing how I just cleaned it spotless I was not expecting to find this after 20 miles of driving. I'll order a replacement PCV valve but in the mean time I'll clean it and see if it reduces oil intake.

    The valve adjustment sounds increasing fun the more details I read about it. I don't plan on replacing the engine any time soon. I'll drive this one until it dies. I love how the engineers make servicing their vehicles so user friendly. If they don't already they should get several mechanics input during the design process. Even if the parts are costly, Toyota would make more money selling a larger quantity of parts if they made their engines easier to work on. Not many people are going to pay a shop $800 to have their valves adjusted unless it's causing major drivability issues.

    Dealer mechanics will try to avoid selling these types of jobs if they are so difficult and time consuming even for them with every special tool. This particular job sounds like the mechanic would get paid less than the amount of time he actually spends working on the car. If that's the case during some of the repair he would be working for free. Got to hate flat rate. I wish all mechanics were paid a good salary because their job is already difficult enough.
     
  13. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Sorry, my only excuse is trying to get over this dang head cold. This data should be closer to what you wanted.

    No A/C and no heater . . . just a drive to lunch were I attached the wrong file. The car was in "D" except for a couple of minutes of "N" while approaching the first light. Afterwards, I just keep it in "D".

    I'm confused by the "(to keep the engine at idle.)" I thought the problem happens when the engine is off at a stop and then the car accelerates and spins up the engine.

    Now some of what you'd like to see can not be recorded with this scanner. The Prius has an Engine ECU, Hybrid ECU, Battery ECU, Cruise Control ECU, plus the body ECUs. The TechStream software records data from only one ECU at a time. I spent about 15 minutes trying to get multiple data elements from both the Engine and Hybrid ECU without any luck.

    Now it so happens I have a couple of Graham Miniscanners that can record up to six data items from the 50 available from the engine, hybrid, and battery ECUs. I've got to take a nap (long day at work,) but I'll see if I can get one configured for the data you ask for and make another file tomorrow.

    Bob Wilson
     

    Attached Files:

  14. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Yes, you are correct. The problem does occur when the engine is off at a stop while in D. The reason I requested the data while the engine is at idle is for additional comparison. I think it would help troubleshoot the issue, looking for a sensor that is on its way out etc. When the engine is off the ECU pid values I have access to view are displayed, however they are all at rest. The ECU is in closed loop, and the pid values are at their lowest KOEO key on engine off state. With none of the values active there aren't any ranges to view. You're right I should probably compare both conditions, especially with the engine off to at least see if my pid values base lines are similar to yours.

    I connected a vacuum gauge to get a better idea on the condition of the engine. At idle the vacuum readings were steady between 21-22 in HG depending on how the ECU was adjusting things, and as low as a steady 16 " in HG with the AC on Max. I figure if the issue is the engine trying to start, the gauge will show a reading as it's pretty sensitive. My generic scanner on the other hand is likely too slow to record it.

    While monitoring live data with my CanOBD2 3130 scanner the values will occasionally go blank for several seconds. I called the manufacturer today, and they immediately blame it on my vehicle's network. They instructed me to try it on another vehicle, automatically assuming I owned a 2nd vehicle with OBD2. I highly doubt my Prius has a network issue, from my experience that is extremely rare.

    I'm finding that more and more companies aren't standing behind their products. Manufactures claim to offer tech support when in reality all they really do is place the blame on anything but their products. They are too quick to blame the vehicle's network just because the car has an issue doesn't mean it's related to the multiplex network. I do not recommend INNOVA scanners. They work just ok for retrieving and clearing codes, but are too slow for long term monitoring and recording pids.

    When you manually trigger the scanner to capture/record data it takes several seconds before the scanner even responds and finally displays a wait message that it's recording data. There's too long of a delay which makes the user question if the scanner even got the command. This is frustrating as you're driving down the road messing with a scanner. It's already dangerous enough operating a scan tool as you drive down the road.

    If only I could magically turn my NGS into a Toyota dealer scan tool. To the best of my knowledge my scanner only allows me to view a limited selection of ECU pids. I don't have access to any of the other ECUs that you mentioned are on the 03 Prius. I really need to get a better scan tool. Currently I can't afford one. The correct Toyota scan tool would probably cost more than my car's resale value.
     
  15. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Our NHW11 model Prius, 2001-03 uses ISO-9141/KWP2000 which runs at about 9,000 baud. It is level encoded, sort of like the old RS-232 which means . . . it ain't rocket speed. Think about the computers we had in the late 1990, this is the technology base Toyota used to build these machines. It is like walking up to a 400 mph WW-II fighter and discovering the movable control surfaces are fabric over a metal frame . . . the rest of the plane is flush riveted. . . .
    I'd like to give you some brain-food about Prius-aware scanners:
    • miniVCI - ~$35, Chinese knock-off and hack of Techstream, a company XHorse did the original hack only to discover other Chinese were quite happy to clone their clone . . . little honor among software pirates. Regardless, it has full coverage for our NHW11 and with an XHorse firmware cable, you can get ZVW30 (2010-current 1.8L hatchback) data. However, it suffers the problem of only one ECU at a time. Not quite what I want for my engineering studies, it so far (I don't trust software pirates) seems to work.
    • ScanGaugeII - ~$150, a standalone, four line display, Linear Logic Systems(?), it is more of an driver's aid. However, you can add up to 30 XGAUGEs that define the PID/response pairs. One of our sticky posts has snapshots of what works and thanks to Vincent's efforts, it is sufficiently complete to even handle INFO codes, Toyota error codes not reported in the standard emissions lists. It has and remains the current, best approach for those who want not only to drive efficiently with engineering data but also have a usable if manual debug capability. It does NOT suffer the 'one ECU at a time' problem. Sad to say, there is no data recording capability leading to hacks like 'taking a movie' of the display.
    • AutoEnginuity - ~$500, a USA hack that is an independent but functional alternative to the Techstream. I was running version 9.x until a Windows virus wiped out my virtual-PC image. Sad to say, he also copied the "one ECU at a time" which hobbled it for true engineering studies. Still, it is supported, it works, and one could run a Prius repair shop without having to pay the Techstream 'rental.'
    • Techstream-Lite - $1,000+rental, available from TIS, it is the gold standard except for the crappy 'one ECU at a time' and their software rental architecture. Sure, you can rent it for specific jobs but WHAT A PAIN IN THE . . .
    • Graham Miniscanner - no longer in production, about 300 were sold. It was developed by Graham Davies and used in many of mine and other engineering studies. It too had only four display lines but the RS-232 port could dump a stream of up to six different PIDs that you could configure. There were about 50 critical PIDs programmed in the unit covering key Engine, Hybrid, and Battery ECU metrics. Over the years, I had been buying them up and at one time had three. I sold one with a failed backlight on Ebay last year. The other two are mine until our 2003 Prius 'goes away.'
    Your discovery of the crapped-up, throttle-plate, backside and suggestion of a failed or failing PVC valve makes a lot of sense. The 1.8L engine added a 'compartment' in the block that near as I can tell is just there to let any 'oil mist' settle out and not drift towards and through the PVC valve. The Toyota cleaning kit is supposed to also handle the PVC valve if you have the right 'air tools.' I don't so my plan is to replace it when I do my 150k mile maintenance (all fluids including brake, brake pads, e.t.c.)

    Let's go over the symptom again just so I understand (sorry that dang head cold really 'stupified' me) :
    • stopped at a light, car is in "D" and READY, engine has already shut itself down (we call this Stage 4 of the warm-up operation)
    • something triggers the engine to run while stopped (i.e., turn on AC or heater)
    • engine starts but sounds 'rough', cuts out, several seconds later, it restarts, begins running
    We're trying to diagnose why the engine has a hard time on the self-start, not under a driving load, keeping running?

    Why is it stalling in what should be a light-load condition?

    I have some higher resolution data back at the house (came into work to check on some batch jobs . . . waiting on a computer . . . that pays my bills.) Most of my studies have been investigating cold-start timing and energy flows. If I understand what we're looking at it is a hot-start. My memory is this usually happens in about 250 ms, way faster than even a Graham scanner can get useful data. But I want to make sure we're on the same page.

    Most of the marginal 'start' problems I've had to deal with are associated with fuel and throttle. Spark can go bad but it tends to be not intermittent . . . they just sit there until you pull the right plug and voila. So I'd like to suggest expanding the ambiguity group to include the fuel injectors. A bad or failing injector should also just 'sit there' until you pull the right wire. But 'speculation' they are electrically driven and crappy fuel could make one or more of them go marginal.

    Again, I'm just 'thinking out loud' but I'm wondering if we looked at maximum power operation, we might see a pattern that could lead to fault isolation? If you found maximum acceleration on a steep, 8% grade, tall, 500ft rise, +1 mile rise, might reveal something going on at full power that might be related. Force what sounds like an intermittent against the stops and see what 'squeeks.' . . . just a thought.

    I know you've mentioned turning on the heater, have we eliminated a potential A/C compressor load problem? I don't do A/C but I have a considerable respect for what a black-art it can be. If someone over-charged it, there might be too much lubricant and I'm thinking hydrolock back-torque when the compressor clutch engages.

    Bob Wilson
     
  16. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I'm looking at the electrical schematics. If you can find "CLR MG RELAY", it is what activates the A/C compressor clutch. Pull the relay and maybe you might be able to find causality with the compressor.

    Also, "MAX AC" should also slam it on at will.

    Bob Wilson
     
  17. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Bob, thank you for the data, and information on the scanners. I'll use this info to pick out a better scan tool.

    My Prius is in stage 4 of the warm up operation when the symptom occurs. The problem is that while the engine is off, at a stop, the engine jumps/shakes for only a fraction of a second, pauses and repeats a few time. The engine remains off as if it didn't need to self-start in the first place. It's as if the start up attempt is being cut extremely short, and the ECU changed its mind and decided it didn't need to start after all.

    Sorry I'm not good at explaining the issue. Imagine if the engine being off was actually at a smooth idle, and the attempt to self-start was a slight stumble/misfire. Only the brief stumble/misfire is what I'm feeling behind the wheel. This happens fast and intermittently.

    The fuel injector cleaning seemed to help reduce the harshness of the stumble. I disconnected the fuel line and ran the cleaner directly through the fuel rail and injectors. I temporarily blocked off the fuel supply line with an adapter. There was good fuel pressure, volume/flow. I used the fuel pump to fill the OTC cylinder with 50% fuel.

    The MAF and IAT sensor cleaning improved drivability by smoothing out acceleration and slightly increased engine performance. The reason I'm mentioning this again is because you could be correct about a fuel injector performance issue.

    After looking at your 03 Prius data I noticed a 19.8°F rise in IAT. My IAT had a 55° F rise. Is your IAT/MAF sensor and air intake a factory set up, and location on the engine? Our ECT readings are the same, and ambient air temperature was similar. I think my IAT readings are too high. I'm going to compare it with my DVOM temperature probe reading. I'll pull the spark plugs today, measure the gaps and look for any indicators.

    I don't think turning the AC off prevents the problem from occurring. I don't use my AC too often. I always try avoid turning it on to save fuel during my mostly stop and go driving.

    You have an interesting and excellent idea. I'll try to locate and pull the "CLR MG RELAY" and see what I can find. I don't think the relay locations are mentioned in the owners manual only the fuses. Maybe the relay/fuse box cover identifies this relay.

    Thank you for taking your time to help me out with this. I greatly appreciate it.
     
  18. Patrick Wong

    Patrick Wong DIY Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    18,200
    6,482
    0
    Location:
    Green Valley, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Although I have not personally noticed this, Hobbit (a Yahoo Prius group contributor) had mentioned to me a few years ago that the Prius hybrid vehicle ECU will direct MG1 to rotate the gas engine crankshaft to a point where the engine can quickly restart. Perhaps this is what you are noticing.

    The Prius powertrain demonstrates some quirky behavior from time to time, especially the Classic model years which are basically one or two steps above the science experiment level of development. If you don't see warning lights on, your fuel economy is in the low-40s or better, and the powertrain otherwise performs adequately - then I would say your car is probably OK.
     
  19. trickedout281

    trickedout281 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    12
    0
    0
    Location:
    VA
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Patrick, that is good information to know. Thank you. My fuel economy is in the low to mid 30s . I do mostly stop and go driving through town. That's likely the biggest contributing factor to my lower fuel economy. I used to get around 40-45mpg. My Prius hasn't always exhibited this behavior from when I purchased it used several years ago.
     
  20. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,664
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    You might want to benchmark your car against my data: 2003 Prius

    [​IMG]
    The 'green rectangles' are measured values.The 'gray line' is the theoretical drag vs. engine efficiency curve. Our NHW11 should follow that line at any given speed on a standard day with standard tires. I'm running Sumitomo T4s at 51 psi (their rated maximum) with the largest diameter tires on the front to improve handling and give a 6% 'over-drive' effect. Try to run the test between 55-75F that brackets the Standard Day temperature. These tests were at ~620 ft.

    Find a level, 10 mile stretch or a circular route that you can set the cruise control. Warm-up the car and either run two-passes, both ways, at say 65 mph or take a circular loop for at least 5-10 miles. Set the car speed on cruise control and then reset the trip meter. At 65 mph, you should be getting 52 MPG. Anything less, and we need to figure out what is going on. The two-pass approach allows taking out wind and elevation effects . . . average the results. A circular loop (i.e., beltway) does the same (or close enough.)

    As for the IAT, all I can report is what miniVCI is giving me. I have no other speculation.

    It is lunch time so I'll try to capture some data, fully warmed up with the car in Stage 4 and cycle the AC on and off. Also, I'll cycle the heater, max, on and off. There is a tradeoff between the number of data points and polling, loop time. Once I have some data, I'll post it here and we can mull over it this afternoon.

    BTW, I enjoy working with you on this problem . . . it is a relief to 'talk technical' . . . if you know what I mean. <grins>

    Bob Wilson