Hi Ron, My biggest surprise in reading data from Scangauge was the average speed, but then I realized it includes driving in heavy traffic and stopping for stop light / signs. Could be sitting at a red light for 2 minutes - you're not moving thus your average speed for the total trip is going down. More red lights ... and heavy traffic ... you get the message Gabe
Well done Jim, I'm very impressed. Did you make any big changes or is this the result of just fine tuning? I notice the ICE use dropped from 29 to 25% and it took about 10% longer, does that sum it up?
Well, not even any fine-tuning. Temperature was a little warmer and I had some luck with lighter traffic. There are some two-lane segments, one with 45 MPH PSL and others with 35, on which I usually have traffic behind me, but today had none. So I could go considerably slower there.
Great job Jim! That only functions for Plug-In Prius. It lets us know how many Ah we took out of the battery. It comes in handy to find out how much longer we can travel in EV mode.
No. Jim is doing it all on a stock Prius. The CAN-View is used for plug-in's but any prius can use it. Its kind of like a ScanGauge but more useful.
Well, close to stock. Jay is correct of course, that I don't have a PHEV. I do have a block heater and an EV button.
Thanks! I didn't know CANVIEW could be installed in a non-plug-in. Now is there a formula to convert the electricity used for the EBH to equivalent gallon of gas? If so what would be the equivalent MPG for a Prius without EBH? Thanks!
Oh I see. Since the HV battery pack is rated at 6.5 Ah, it is at about 60% SOC. Prius use the HV pack between 40% to 80% state of charge and aim to stay at 60%.
Somewhere there was a brief mentioning of a Japanese driver who keeps the charge level low to get higher charging efficiency. Any idea/data?
No data, just the widely accepted belief that it's best to use the ICE and the resulting kinetic energy directly for propulsion rather than suffer conversion losses by moving energy into and out of the battery. There will be specific circumstances that probably justify SOC down more -- e.g., before descending a long downhill where significant regeneration will occur.
JimboK, Congrats on the ++ MPGs. Guys like you are a constant encouragement to the rest of us Gen II owners. I routinely get 55ish MPGs on my daily summer commute. I recognize and accept that the nature of my mostly urban driving in limiting. On rare days when traffic is light and I hit the traffic lights just right I'll get low 60s. With guys like you way out in front, everyday is a new challenge. With the HSD, there are many little operating details that at first blush appear to be counterintuitive, eg, not using the HV battery for primary propulsion. But if you look closely, they are based on sound principles, in this case MPG reduction due multiple power conversion losses. I think I need a little education on why keeping a low HV battery charge level -- as seen on the SOC screen -- would be a good idea. From my experience this idea really is counterintuitive. I'm usually trying to keep a high SOC and get no HV charging at all. Some background: I have a ScanGauge, so I can read RPMs, etc. (But in fact, I'm kind of lazy and I don't do a lot of gauge switching when underway.) I have noticed that when I'm on the highway, cruising steadily on Cruise Control, the HSD likes to keep the SOC up around high 6 blue bars -- 65%+ on SG -- and even into the first green bar -- 67.5+ SOC. I take these SOC conditions to be indicative of what the HSD considers most desirable/most efficient. So when I drive, I look for opportunities within the accepted algorithms to get and keep high SOC. Those algorithms would include: * minimize regen -- yes, some does happen down hills, etc. * maximize no arrows glide * accelerate in the 1600-240 RPM band * whenever possible drive at speeds/RPMs that result in no energy flows into or out of the HV battery. I have noticed that at lowish SOC conditions, 50% as an example, RPMs are higher, as the HSD "bleeds" off power through the power split device to MG1 to raise the SOC. At 65% SOC under the same conditions, -- including speed, topography, etc. -- RPMs are lower -- no power is directed through MG1, and I'm assuming MPGs are higher. My question then is, if my understanding is correct, why would trying to keep SOC low be a good idea? Like it or not the HSD is going to bleed of power at every opportunity to charge the HV battery to it's preferred ~65% level. Yes? No? .
See here for the Japanese driver's SOC strategy (again it was just brief description): World record distance on a single tank for a Prius II - Japan - July 4 - Aug 16, 2006 - CleanMPG Forums
Thanks for digging that up. I had seen that and was aware of the "world record", but I had forgotten any details of that thread. I would bet she used the conventional method of gliding -- i.e., feathering the pedal enough for all arrows to disappear on the Energy screen. Even though the screen suggests no current flow, there actually is some out of the battery, up to about 8 amps depending on speed. For this I do have data, which suggest that, in my test conditions using that method, SOC maintains a state of equilibrium of sorts at around 55-56%, or 4-5 bars. I know from other threads (sorry, I can't find any to link at the moment) the Japanese hypermilers use a faster acceleration rate than what I tested. With a faster rate the battery has less time to charge during pulses, so it seems plausible that a lower equilibrium level -- i.e., the reported 3-4 bars -- is maintained. It's not clear to me from Yoshi's thread if those low levels are deliberately sought or they are just a byproduct of the chosen acceleration rate. As a result of my testing, these days I mainly use neutral to glide, which as you can see from my data results in less current draw out of the battery and higher level of SOC equilibrium. I also accelerate even more gently than the rates I describe in my tests above. I have done some preliminary testing comparing various acceleration rates during pulse and glide. With all due respect to the Japanese hypermilers, the results suggest these gentle rates are at least as efficient as those in higher ranges. I emphasize, however, that this is preliminary testing. The test environment was less than ideal (traffic disrupted my glides on the two-lane rural road I was using), and eventually I'd like to repeat the tests in a different environment. So to summarize: I am convinced my results are at least as good if not better when I stay out of the battery. That is, except in low-demand conditions where it's likely inefficient to run the ICE, like extending a glide a short distance or moving between closely spaced red lights. But in those situations I've got plenty of juice for a short run of EV mode, because I've kept SOC high.
Thanks for more detailed info! I am also very interested in finding out the best acceleration rate, since "glide" is easy but "pulse" can be hard or soft and there are different opinions out there which one is better. Please keep us posted your findings. Thanks!