Interesting. "IBM earned top honors among electronics manufacturers on a recently-updated climate friendliness scorecard (.pdf), earning 77 out of a possible 100 points to beat runners-up Canon, Toshiba, Sony and HP in a ranking of the companies' responsiveness to climate change. IBM, which makes big, hulking servers and mainframe computers, even beat out Microsoft (38 points) and Google (55), whose products are composed entirely of electrons. Apple, which has taken heat from Greenpeace for the allegedly toxic chemicals in its iPhone, scored a pathetic 11 out of 100."
interesting how "climate change" and "eco friendly" replaced "global warming" so, does that mean they will shut down all other factories in U.S. while selling additional "polution credits" to China, India and other non-western nations? Can anyone explain why toxic wastelands (China, India and rest) are being given additional 'pollution credits', yet already 'clean' West is not allowed to keep, much less expand it's industry?
