I am trying to decide between a 2003 Prius, which is around $10,000 and 2005 Prius, which is around $15,000. The 2003 would be purchased from a individual and the 2005 from a dealer. They both have about 70,000 miles. Is the 2005 model considerably better and worth the extra money? If so how? If I buy the 2003 Prius from the individual, how can I get a warranty? Thank you.
Well, for one thing, the 2005 is a Gen II, while the 2003 is a Gen I. The 2005 has a split rear window, while the 2003 is solid in the lower part. Out of curiosity, what options does each have?
2003 Pros: sedan (if that's what you want) privacy of a trunk ridiculously small turning radius spacious interior for its exterior size airy dashboard side airbags were available as in GPS Cons: it's using an older THS system has an older battery technology no folding rear seats hybrid powertrain close to end of warranty (in terms of years) 2005 Pros: hatchback design fold-flat rear seats more powerful and more economical spacious newer technology (smart key, bluetooth, backup camera etc) Stability control and side/side curtain airbags are available newer HSD system Touring edition with upgraded suspension and tyres Cons: larger car (if that matters) larger turning radius more common hatchback design (if you hate hatchbacks)
70k is allot of mileage for the 2005. It's even high for a 2003. That being said, the 2005 if it is in excellent condition should be about $17K the 2003 as a private party sale if it is in good condition is worth about $11k. In either case I would have the cars checked out before agreeing to either. My preference would be the 2005 as it is a Gen II and has a much nicer ride and has more room in both the trunk and cabin. I would also look further you might do better with a lower mileage vehicle for slightly more money.