EPA Turns Down CA on emissions petition

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by oxnardprof, Dec 19, 2007.

  1. oxnardprof

    oxnardprof Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    249
    17
    0
    Location:
    Oxnard, CA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    The EPA turned down California's petition to control CO2 emissions. The headline in the NY Times says the petition is renderd moot by the recent 'improvements' in the new enrgy bill.

    I think EPA is in error, and the new MPG standards are not particularly progressive - they do not push the technology of personal transportation.

    I am disappointed, what do others think?
     
  2. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Do you expect anything better when we have guys like Bill Wehrum running the Air division? Previously we had the famed Jeffrey Holmstead.. I'm thinking they may just cut to the chase and just turn over the EPA to be run as a division of Exxon/Mobile. :)
     
  3. finman

    finman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    1,287
    111
    0
    Location:
    Albany, OR
    Vehicle:
    2014 Nissan LEAF
    NPR said this AM that the Governator will sue the EPA for not allowing CA to set higher vehicle emission standards than the feds. 17 other states want to adopt the same strict CA vehicle emission standards. Bush admin stated they want across the board emission standards so car makers wouldn't have to build different cars for different markets.

    Well, it does make sense in a way, but...the question is why are the feds are not making stricter vehicle emission standards? I've always wondered why the right thing to do is so hard. Make the damn PZEV cars for everyone! Is it really a $$$ profit issue? Can we not justify cleaner air with modern technology even if it costs x amount more? When do we as a species reallize pollution not good? when do we associate the health costs of NOT trying to reduce pollution to the cost of healthy, clean air?

    More questions than answers, but, I am really tired of the whole make a short-term profit without considering long-term effects.

    No environment, no profits. Know the environment, know long-term success profits.
     
  4. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Yes. That's precisely the problem. SUV's have the best profit margin, hence the auto mfgs push them relentless in their marketing. This is a case where gov't regulation via mandates or taxes is necessary because the market won't fix these sorts of problems (seat belts would be another good example).
     
  5. zenMachine

    zenMachine Just another Onionhead

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    3,355
    300
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Yet he opposes having a global standard and prefers each country to set its own. Doublespeak?
     
  6. Prius101

    Prius101 Paid off Prius Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    118
    10
    24
    Location:
    Port Orchard, WA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
  7. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    The EPA are a bunch of muppets put there by a pox bottle.
     
  8. IsrAmeriPrius

    IsrAmeriPrius Progressive Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2004
    4,333
    7
    0
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    In the Los Angeles Times:

    [Selected highlights]