So Michael Moore's "Sicko" opens nationwide today. I haven't seen a review that doesn't rave about it! For those who see it, what do you think? Oh, and I saw Moore on the Daily Show yesterday. He said he had an interview scheduled with Larry King, but he got bumped by the Paris Hilton interview. Gotta love America!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boulder Bum @ Jun 29 2007, 02:44 AM) [snapback]469898[/snapback]</div> My wife and I plan on seeing it tonight. It will actually be our first Michael Moore film. I saw him on the Daily Show too, he was quite funny. If I remember, I will post my review of it.
I'll wait to rent it when it hits DVD, I reserve my limited going to the movies budget for well acted stories with good plots and overpriced blow everything up action films with over the top special effects.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(morpheusx @ Jun 29 2007, 02:35 PM) [snapback]470282[/snapback]</div> What like "Live Free or Die Hard"? I already saw Sicko on google a couple weekends ago. I've seen all of Moore's films in the theater and I will see Sicko in the theater either tonight or Sunday. It's important that everyone see this film, in the theater or on DVD, doesn't matter. We need to fix this broken system now.
I was surprised to see it got 5 out of 5 stars in our newspaper review this morning. Rarely do any movies get that rating - but Ratatouille was a close second with 4 1/2 stars! If you go into the movie with the understanding that MM is framing the facts to fit his opinion, his movies can be very interesting - and entertaining.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pyccku @ Jun 29 2007, 02:58 PM) [snapback]470291[/snapback]</div> Yeah but watching this film, you'll be agreeing with him. It's not just "his opinion" it's most American's opinions he is expressing. It's a great film.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(wiiprii @ Jun 29 2007, 03:07 PM) [snapback]470297[/snapback]</div> Yeah, he does take creative license with his story line. For example, he did meet with Roger Smith during the filming of Roger and Me, but you wouldn't know that after watching his movie.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(wiiprii @ Jun 29 2007, 05:47 PM) [snapback]470286[/snapback]</div> Yeah like Live free or die hard. You just can't beat a Die Hard movie. Yipee cai yea mother ...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Spoid @ Jun 29 2007, 04:37 PM) [snapback]470311[/snapback]</div> I've heard this elsewhere and decided to look it up, but this doesn't sound like a completely credible claim. The only thing I could find was by a guy named "Michael Westfall": http://michaelwestfall.tripod.com/index.html He calls himself an "American Conservative Worker" and wrote an article called "MICHAEL MOORE VERSUS AMERICA" where he says, among other things "Michael Moore, who wasn’t even from Flint, had few credentials and is not the genius intellect that his Leftist liberal pals thinks that he is". http://michaelwestfall.tripod.com/id101.html I'm not even sure I believe what this guy is saying given the radical obviously slanted language he's using, though at least one claim seems plausible. Basically all he's claiming was that Moore got 2-3 minutes in front of a microphone at a shareholder meeting near the end of filming. Not exactly "meeting with" Roger Smith in the way I'd presume, even if it happened.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boulder Bum @ Jun 29 2007, 08:02 PM) [snapback]470453[/snapback]</div> According to these guys, he actually met him twice, once was a 20 minute interview according to a union activist. http://www.cbc.ca/arts/film/dissent.html But they are Canadians and it could be some sort of delusion caused by a by-product of their health care system.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Spoid @ Jun 29 2007, 10:17 PM) [snapback]470489[/snapback]</div> It's a bit hard to fact-check, but apparently Jim Musselman, Mike Westfall, Ralph Nadar, and Michael Moore are all involved in the spat somehow (they all knew each other because of "Roger and Me" and through some related work Musselman, Westfall and Moore did previously). A different source says this about Moore's alleged interview with Roger Smith: Not sure who to believe on this. The source of the allegation seems dubious, though I don't think it would change the important points of "Roger and Me" either way. Oh well. I went to see Sicko tonight and I thought it was very thought provoking. I still think "Roger and Me" was Moore's best work (I actually disliked "Bowling for Columbine" and thought "Farenheit 9/11" was only so-so), but Sicko was pretty great, all in all. It fascinates me to learn about how big-business manipulates national policy, and how different things are in other countries. One of the more infuriating points was that the senator most responsible for pushing a health care bill that won the health care industry a fortune (at the expensive of America's ill) ended up being hired by a health care company a few years later at the salary of two million dollars a year. Moore also pointed out something about France that I noticed in my visit there. Namely, the people are much more active in politics and protest when they don't like what's happening in the government (I actually missed a flight to Rome partially because of a railway strike). The thing about it is that the French are actually successful at influencing policy as a result of their activism! Americans, if they even put the effort into knowing what's wrong with our country, never seem to do much about the problem. Too busy watching American Idol or checking in with Paris Hilton, I guess.
Yep, Boulder - you've got the French figured out! They love to strike. Almost every day there is SOME group on strike. Sometimes you find out why, sometimes now. I've seen farmer strikes, railroad strikes, metro worker strikes, and Eiffel tower elevator operator strikes in my travels there. And I narrowly missed an airport worker strike by leaving the day before it started. French people in general have opinions on political matters because they know if enough of them get p!ssed off, something will change. Here, it doesn't matter how big the demonstration, the gov't keeps running things as usual. How many millions were in the immigration demonstrations? And yet nothing happens. No wonder Americans watch AI or Paris Hilton. They know it doesn't really matter how they feel about the other issues, so why bother?
This film is a "must see" for anyone in any country without national health care. It's incredulous. As an aside I saw the film last night and my neighbor today who just returned from Cuba. While there his daughter took ill and they had to go to a hospital. Although my neighbor hasn't been home long enough to see 'Sicko', everything Moore told us about Cuban healthcare my neighbor substantiated. Michael Moore is the preeminent film maker of our times, with a conscience. Vacillating whether to go or not? GO!!!
DISCLAIMER: I have nothing but good things to say about Blue Cross. When I moved to Massachusetts, when my COBRA insurance was running out, I was desperately trying to find someone who would sell health insurance to an individual. The ONLY one who would was Blue Cross. Before I filled out a single form, I said, "Can I still get it for my wife even though she has diabetes?" They said, "Of course!" - I question I double-checked every step of the way, and always got the same answer no matter who I asked. When she was in the hospital, the doctors never denied her a single operation or medication she needed. They even flew her from our local hospital to Massachusetts General Hospital (with insurance picking up the tab minus a $50 "ambulance deductible") without batting an eye. Yes, in the end I had to pay maybe about $1000 in deductibles, but considering the bill for her entire stay was over $400,000, I'm not complaining. </Disclaimer> Given that, anyone who doesn't think our health care system is a really bad joke falls into one of four categories: HMO CEO, Pharmaceutical Company CEO, Insurance CEO, or member of Congress being paid huge sums by one of the above. Unfortunately, this wake-up call won't wake anyone up that needs to be (ie, every American citizen), but you have to give Michael Moore full credit for trying.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stev0 @ Jul 6 2007, 07:31 PM) [snapback]474348[/snapback]</div> My parents have Blue Cross and get excellent service by their medical care professionals. Their premiums have doubled. Blue Cross is presently being investigated by the State. They sold to some company that now owns them. They promised rates wouldn't go up and money wouldn't be shipped out of state to the parent company or something like that. Well, their rates doubled and surprise, they shipped millions in "profit" to the parent company. So, they're being investigated. And my parents, who are on a fixed income, are now paying through the nose. Sure, they're getting treatment. But they're paying dearly for it. And Blue Cross is in violation of some securities thing.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stev0 @ Jul 6 2007, 05:31 PM) [snapback]474348[/snapback]</div> You are lucky that you are not insured by Blue Cross of California which has a history of retroactively canceling numerous members' private, as opposed to group, policies after they got sick and ran up high medical bills.
Insurance in CA is a different beast than insurance in MA. When I lived in CA, I had Aetna through my employer. I have no complaints with them, either. When I quit my job, I had 18 months health insurance with them through COBRA. When I switched to Blue Cross MA, paying by myself (as opposed to my employer kicking in a generous percentage), I actually paid LESS per month than I did for my insurance in CA, and I had just as good coverage. Recently Blue Cross MA raised their rates, too, but I'm still paying less per month than I was five years ago in CA (and not even paying the whole thing). On a totally unrelated note, Income tax in CA is also a lot higher than MA, and you pay taxes on more things (eg, clothes).
I'm surprised they let a patient with diabetes on a plan. I applied for temporary health care for the few weeks down time I had between jobs and I got denied personal coverage because my (already insured) wife was pregnant! Her pregnancy was MY pre-existing condition!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boulder Bum @ Jul 6 2007, 11:37 PM) [snapback]474529[/snapback]</div> If I understand it correctly, Blue Cross is an entirely different company in each state. The common name makes you think it's one company nationwide. But it is not. When I moved from North Dakota to Washington State, everything changed except the fact that I pay a bucketload of money in premiums and deductibles and coinsurance amounts, and I can go to whatever doctor I like. And apparently they have an agreement between them which waived any waiting period for pre-existing conditions, but I don't know if that agreement is bilateral between ND and WA, or if all the Blue Cross companies respect a similar agreement among them. I'm happy with the health care I get. But I don't think I've ever collected more in care than I've paid in premiums, except maybe this year, with both a heart operation and a prostate operation in the same year; but even this year I think I'm paying in more than I'm getting out from Blue Cross. In other words, I'm essentially paying cash for all my health care. I'm very lucky to be one of the few who can afford it.