UK advertising body tells Toyota to modify 'misleading' Prius TV advert

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by jiepsie, Jun 6, 2007.

  1. jiepsie

    jiepsie New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    267
    3
    0
    LONDON (Thomson Financial) - The UK's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) told Toyota Motor Corp today to modify a television advertisement which it found misled consumers about how much the Japanese carmaker's Prius car benefited the environment.

    The advertisement claimed that the hybrid gas-electric vehicle emitted up to one tonne of carbon dioxide less per year than a similar family car with a diesel engine.

    But the advertising watchdog said Toyota's data was based on the 20,000 kilometre (12,000-mile) average annual distance driven by cars in the United States, instead of the 13,440 kilometres average in Britain.

    More on the Thomson Financial website.

    And here's what the ASA said, the original "adjudication" (never heard that word before):
    http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Pu...F_ADJ_42615.htm

    Edit: added a link to the ASA adjudication.
     
    #1 jiepsie, Jun 6, 2007
  2. Frank Hudon

    Frank Hudon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    4,147
    19
    0
    and way less NOx than any diesel on the road today.
     
    #2 Frank Hudon, Jun 6, 2007
  3. dmckinstry

    dmckinstry New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    1,034
    4
    0
    Location:
    Cheney, WA (Near Spokane)
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(lowlander @ Jun 6 2007, 08:09 AM) [snapback]456537[/snapback]</div>

    Don't they understand what "up to" means?

    Dave M.
     
    #3 dmckinstry, Jun 6, 2007
  4. KV55

    KV55 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    126
    43
    0
    Location:
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius
    Model:
    Excel
    But even "up to" is misleading because I travel 17,000 miles per year, so I get better than the one tonne saving ie there is no "up to" limit. Toyota should just keep it simple and say it is way cleaner than X, Y and Z. I wonder who put the complaint in to the ASA?
     
    #4 KV55, Jun 7, 2007
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)