I have had practically zero capacity loss in my 8.79-kWh Panasonic NMC prismatic-cell 2021 Prius Prime Limited battery so far in four years and over 36,000 miles, still getting a BEV range of 40 miles on a full charge. I should state that I do baby my battery though—never charging it until I am ready to drive, driving gently, keeping it at no more than 70% SOC when the car is not driven, etc. This study confirms that even regular people see no more than about a 10% capacity loss in general. New study shows: EV batteries last much longer than expected—electrive.com
Biggest loss of capacity in most Lithium type batteries is from too much heat or too much charging. If you live in a place like Arizona it's going to be a problem sooner than later. Also if you have ADHD / OCD and you're constantly trying to charge your battery up as much as possible, that can create problems too, but usually the manufacture protects you from that, though that was a problem with Teslas a 1/2 dozen years ago.
Is that German? I have no idea what that chart says... I'm sure everyone else thinks the same. Posting a chart in a foreign language without a description of the point you're trying to make with that chart ain't gonna get you many likes. Do you speak the language in the chart?
Perhaps you might try Google translate and enter the text and seeing the equivalent in another language. I took a few minutes to look for source paper but didn't have much luck. Can you find the original report? The reason I ask is the news article suggests OBD ports were used to gather the data. But Teslas in North America lack an OBD port. Bob Wilson
I definitely would of bothered nobody and just used Google translate but you posted an image not text and no link...
My battery is still at 100% SOH after four years. I would say I have had about 200 cycles so far. Babying your battery will keep it like a baby.
Another data point: This matches my expected battery degradation. It is built into the NMC chemistry and only affects the expected, 100% battery range. Bob Wilson
Upon reflection, my soon to be 6 year.old Model 3 is entering touring bike range, 200 miles or less. Yet no one thinks the less for those who drive on two wheels as long as their kidneys don't hurt. But such things are not for everyone ... just the old and soon forgotten. Bob Wilson
We should get data that separates LiFePO4 batteries from LiOn. I expect that the LiFeSo4 batteries last much longer. JeffD
Outside of China, LFP hasn't been available for long. Going to be less data on them in this study, and cars there are going to be in the low mile part of the chart.
LFP is a lithium-ion cell. It refers to the cathode active material, the other common materials being NMC and NCA. There is really no difference in the cell architecture in comparison to other types of lithium-ion cells.
LFP gives two benefits: 1. longer cycle life 2. Less likely to go up in flames There is a negative factor, LFP has a slightly lower energy density I don't care about semantics, just that LFP is safer and handles more charging cycles. JeffD
And typically cheaper, too, with the main disadvantage being the energy density. In any case, they are lithium-ion cells, with LFP only referring to a flavor of the cathode active material. Nevertheless, people often have the common misconception that LFP is not a lithium-ion cell. It is important to realize what LFP refers to when discussing technical performance characteristics—otherwise, we don’t even know what we are talking about to begin with, let alone speculate on complicated technical details.