1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Coal rolling pickup runs from prius after swiping Front quarter

Discussion in 'Gen 4 Prius Main Forum' started by lohikaarme, Jun 28, 2020.

  1. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk EGR Fanatic

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,690
    39,236
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    Just bugging me: was there any coal-rolling, or it's just that kind of truck?
     
  2. kwyjibo

    kwyjibo Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    17
    8
    0
    Location:
    us
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius
    Model:
    Four Touring
    In the video, there appears to be no coal-rolling. Looks like a Silverado 2500 which should have exhaust pointing to the passenger side but who knows what modifications there were on that truck.

    Coal-rolling victims get it worst in the right lane bc most vehicles' exhaust dumps on the passenger side. I'm not proud to share that I get coal-rolled on a regular basis bc I bike to work everyday- i'm even more embarrassed to say that getting coal-rolled by certain diesel trucks is not as bad as the regular gassers bc the fumes are somewhat tolerable. I'm not frolicking on the bike.... I'm huffing and puffing so those fumes make a big difference.
     
    Mendel Leisk likes this.
  3. lohikaarme

    lohikaarme Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    332
    328
    13
    Location:
    NY
    Vehicle:
    2023 Prius
    Model:
    Limited AWD-e
    when the court case is over I will repost the full video and you can see he has an exhaust issue
     
    Mambo Dave and Mendel Leisk like this.
  4. lohikaarme

    lohikaarme Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    332
    328
    13
    Location:
    NY
    Vehicle:
    2023 Prius
    Model:
    Limited AWD-e
    Here is a small update to the situation. It turns out the kid was the son of a sheriff which could explain why he believed the law did not apply to him. The father is also the head of the brotherhood of the blahblah union in the very county where the accident happened and of which the responding sheriff belonged. This may explain why the kid was not charged with running from the scene or driving without insurance. Also on the police report it did not contain the kid's license number which could make things tickey.

    That being said, I tracked the case regarding the ticket the kid did receive regarding changing lanes unsafely. The court docket actually had uploads of all the paperwork including the citation which contained the kids license number (this becomes important later). The kid bought insurance the night of the accident and had it for traffic court two weeks later. He pled no contest but was found guilty and had to shell out $175. This is important because he could have claimed he was not driving (for when I sue him) but the court ruling found him at fault and that came with a fine and two points.

    Having the name and the license number I could do a public search and found that he had a ticket from two years earlier of 90 in 65. He did not show up to his court date and the judge threatened to hold him in contempt but ultimately he paid online and claimed he was on active duty. Two notes to this: the license number, address, and phone number all matched across the two tickets so chances were good that was his real address. I did an SCRA search to find that he was active military at the time but went off of active duty October 23, 2019. While he is in the reserves now, he is trying to operate some contracting business in the area and is no longer active. For those that do not know, you cannot sue a person on active military duty in a civil matter.

    Quick side note: to the guy that thought I was just cruising in the left lane, **** you. clearly I was in a passing maneuver, watch the video again.

    Back to the story. So ultimately I filed a case in small claims court. The target amount is the deductible and the court cost. While there is no way to force him to pay simply by getting a judgement, it is laying the groundwork to bring him in for disposition and wage garnishment\asset collection. As he has a business in the area he has income and items I can access. He also is not going to immediately leave the state. It looks like he went live with the business about a month after the accident. The court date is Oct 23, 1 year to the day he went inactive. While he has been ducking the summons I finally hired a bailiff to serve him. The clerk informed me that a sheriff will try to deliver 3x and then attach it to the door and it is considered served.

    Also I spoke again with his insurance company alerting them to the fact I was filing a crash report and learned he cancelled his policy six weeks after the accident. Sure he could have switched companies, but given the situation I am thinking he just bought insurance until the court case cleared.

    Now, in order to apply maximum pressure, I filed an uninsured crash report. This did not exist in new york- but apparently ohio does not play with uninsured drivers. The way this works is you file with motor vehicles proving you took damage by an uninsured driver. You need the driver license number. Once they register it, they will suspend the driver license. I received a letter on Saturday indicating that they set the suspension up and that it will take effect on October 30.

    There are only three ways for the suspension to be removed:
    1. The individual declares bankruptcy
    2. The individual waits out two years
    3. Motor vehicles received both a letter from him and from me confirming the debt has been paid

    The debt on record is the full amount of the repair cost $1500. The license suspension is to rectify both the debt to me and to my insurance company. So if I win in small claims court he will now owe me $1065 (which accrues interest), he needs to prove to the BMV he paid me $1500 for that suspension to be removed. Even if he pays the $1500 he still owes me another $65 for the court costs of which I can bring him into court for dispositioning. Failure to show for dispositioning the court can hold the defendant in contempt (remember by that point the decision is already rendered by the court that money is owed).

    So long story short, I got him on a few different angles here.
     
  5. Mambo Dave

    Mambo Dave Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2019
    641
    306
    0
    Location:
    33312
    Vehicle:
    2019 Prius
    Model:
    L Eco
    I am so glad you have chased him down. I learned a lot from your process, and know I wouldn't have known what to do were something like that happen to me.
     
  6. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk EGR Fanatic

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,690
    39,236
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    All I keep thinking is he picked the wrong guy to run into. (y)
     
  7. kwyjibo

    kwyjibo Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    17
    8
    0
    Location:
    us
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius
    Model:
    Four Touring
    Thank you for the update. At the start of the clip, you had just passed some Buick microsuv, so no one is simply cruising in the left lane.

    That buick had its windows up and for good reason bc there was an exhaust cloud coming to it and the ?impala (or is it a camry w DRLs? can anyone ID that car directly behind the truck) next to it when the kid driving the monster truck was too impulsive to wait for the OP to get over to the right lane. In order to avoid rear-ending that CRV the kid was closing in on, most would simply hit the brakes and call it a day, but instead he chose to pop over to the left lane, not realizing that his ridiculously long truck couldn't clear it. He may not have hit the accelerator that hard to get by the OP out of fear of actually rear-ending the CRV. Who knows if he can actually see the front passenger corner of his monster truck? He most certainly couldn't see his rear driver's side corner!

    I stand corrected: there may have been some coal-rolling but I hope it wasn't as bad for the OP as it was for the Buick and sedan directly behind the truck. With windows up and quick reflexes of switching the vents to recirculate, it's not as bad as driving a convertible geo metro (which I don't) or riding a bike in stop-and-go traffic during some Murican truckathon.

    One might argue that bc the kid was so impulsive, there was barely any time for the OP to safely get over to the right lane, and by the OP staying in the left lane, avoided any collision in which he could be at fault. OP was completely in his lane during the collision unlike the kid driving the truck, so there is no question the kid is at fault. The video doesn't display how fast each vehicle is going but it certainly looks fast enough to lead to some serious injuries. I'd consider both of you very lucky.

    Oh, and small detail- IMHO, this was a collision, NOT an accident. Some might even call this an avoidable collision. When bicyclists get injured from reckless events similar to this that are actually captured on video, we never never call it an accident. Unfortunately, many drivers keep driving and some claim they didn't even know they hit anything.
     
    #47 kwyjibo, Sep 28, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2020
    Mambo Dave and lohikaarme like this.
  8. lohikaarme

    lohikaarme Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    332
    328
    13
    Location:
    NY
    Vehicle:
    2023 Prius
    Model:
    Limited AWD-e
    I will give him the benefit of the doubt in that he ran out of driving skill and caused an accident, however, driving without insurance is no accident and was a decision. All the extra aggravation he now will have: the court, the license suspension, the extra cost on top of what the damages would have been alone, the out of pocket expenses for the repairs if he actually ever pays, the reduced chance of talking his way out of the passing citation, and maybe even some ground to argue he was not totally at fault (although the video makes it clear but maybe the next guy will not have video) all could have been different if he chose to do the right thing and buy insurance.

    The fact that six weeks after the accident he cancelled his policy either means he learned absolutely nothing (or he shopped around and bought a different policy) I honestly have no proof he straight up went back to no coverage, maybe he did actually transfer to another company or he got rid of the truck. Either way, he is 22 years old, his father is a sheriff, he was stopped not even two years before for a 90 in a 65 (at which time he did have insurance), he should know better.
     
    vegan and Mambo Dave like this.
  9. Blueeyedme

    Blueeyedme Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    5
    0
    0
    Location:
    Pine Ridge, FL
    Vehicle:
    2020 Prius
    Model:
    Limited
    These asshats have been around for a long time. Experienced it in our 2011 Prius and our Tesla. Haven't run into it yet with our new Prius, but they're out there nonetheless.