1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Bulgarian Scientist in Legal Argument with Toyota

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by Areometer, Feb 3, 2006.

  1. Areometer

    Areometer Silver Business Sponsor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    578
    6
    0
    Location:
    Tyngsboro, MA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Bulgarian Scientist in Legal Argument with Toyota


    People: 2 February 2006, Thursday.

    The transmission of Toyota's Prius has been invented and developed by the Bulgarian Rumen Antonov, but he has received no financial benefits from his invention, German Die Welt wrote.

    Antonov, who is currently living in France, has brought a legal suit in Germany against the automobile giant, the newspaper reported.

    The scientist is claiming EUR 3 M as he has developed the new automatic transmission used by Toyota in its models Prius and Lexus RX. The Bulgarian has patented the transmission invented by him in France back in 1988 and since 1992 he has a license, which is valid on the territory of Europe.

    "Toyota" is using my invention as a key technology but so far I have not received any license fees, Antonov told Die Welt.

    After talking to lawyers Antonov decided to launch the legal suit against Toyota in Germany as the local legislation provided relatively short trial.

    The trial has once been postponed to allow the two sites enter in negotiations, which later proved fruitless. Even more, Die Welt wrote, Toyota attacked Antonov's license in front of the Federal Patent Court in Munich claiming its insignificance.

    Meanwhile, the amount of Antonov's claim might increase as his invention multiplies in each Toyota car.

    Rumen Antonov escaped to the West from Bulgaria in 1988 at the age of 44. Antonov's unique automatic automotive transmission is licensed to several leading car manufacturers by Antonov Automotive Technologies.

    >> Original Link
     
  2. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    It's amusing to note how many small-timers pop out of the woodwork
    with similar arguments, saying that their own little warm-over of
    a 3-speed bicycle hub was !!stolen!! by Toyota. Fact is, planetaries
    and variants have been used in transmissions of all kinds for years,
    especially automatic transmissions, so there's plenty of prior art.
    .
    Heck, the model T ford had a 2-speed manual planetary gearset.
    .
    _H*
     
  3. Kiloran

    Kiloran New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    1,225
    3
    0
    Not much information from which to draw any sort of conclusion as to merit.
     
  4. Ken Cooper

    Ken Cooper New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    339
    5
    0
    You're right, it's just a planetary gear set. The interface though is a work of art. If this fellow did indeed come up with this boot-strap like concept that so beautifully coordinates with engine and electrical power for optimum torque, then he does indeed deserve recognition. But if he's not the one responsible, I, for one, would like to know who is. From an engineering perspective it's a truly wonderful piece of work.
     
  5. Bob Allen

    Bob Allen Captainbaba

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    1,273
    11
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    There's a guy in Brataslavia who invented transparent glass and is also pressing a lawsuit against not only Toyota, but GM, Ford, Chrysler and Mazda. I'll post the link when I find it.
     
  6. dipper

    dipper Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    1,242
    252
    0
    Shouldn't he sue companies like Owens-Corning instead? They sell more glass windows and doors than all the cars combined.

    Image no glass windows in any new house construction.... :lol:
     
  7. Rattrap

    Rattrap New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    1
    0
    0
    Interested in Ken Cooper's comment about the invention being a great piece of engineering.

    I am not an engineer so cannot make any statement about whether antonov's invention is original but:
    The patent goes back a long way (late 80s in France, the US one is filed in 1991- now expired?)
    The Antonov company is listed in the UK secondary stock market ("AIM").
    They have announced a recent 'option' on a deal with a Chinese company for a six-speed gearbox.
    One of their non-executive directors is a non-exec and former CEO of several UK listed businesses...

    On the other hand the company has been listed 10 years and made no sales to speak of. Customers seem to evaporate at the last minute.

    A curious business - would be interested if anyone else has dug around. The other claimant, Solomon, is transparently bogus. Is Antonov real or a higher grade of gold digger?


    The text of the press release (which is released under UK financial disclosure rules) hints that the situation is Toyota did not offer enough.


    The US patent (the original is in French) is at:
    http://v3.espacenet.com/origdoc?DB=EPODOC&...614d39b53faca71
     
  8. jono

    jono New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    3
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Ken Cooper @ Feb 9 2006, 02:11 AM) [snapback]206232[/snapback]</div>
    YES i know who REALLY invented the "power split device" it was my father. It was derived from an award winning differential patented in 1988. Toyota are not using Antonovs technology as Antonovs requires a box and the "psd" is self supporting for one thing. Toyota got it from our dishonest patent attorney. Hence toyotas sudden change from traditional belt and pulley cvts to the "psd" which is actually a more signicant invention than most people realise with virtually limitless applications in anything that requires power transferred from source to output.

    Any investors out there want to take on toyota???
     
  9. eagle33199

    eagle33199 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    5,122
    268
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rattrap @ Feb 18 2006, 05:54 PM) [snapback]212016[/snapback]</div>
    I don't know about the rest, but i can tell you that patents are valid for 20 years from the date filed (except in the cases of medical devices and other items that need to be FDA approved - those can get an extension to cover the time it takes to move through the FDA process)
     
  10. wstander

    wstander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    982
    1
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(eagle33199 @ Aug 3 2006, 08:16 AM) [snapback]296964[/snapback]</div>
    Is that true for non-US patent law as well?

    Recall that one of the tenets of patent law is application and proof beyond an idea.

    Look up Seldon vs Ford concerning the automobile..
     
  11. Charles Suitt

    Charles Suitt Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    1,637
    16
    0
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    <_< Hmmmmmmmmm

    Seems to me that the planteary gearset was used in the Ford Model-T - same gearset as in the Prius although linked to the internal combustion engine in a different manner.

    You don't have to have a valid claim to file a lawsuit, just a lawyer.... **SIGH**
     
  12. eagle33199

    eagle33199 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    5,122
    268
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(wstander @ Aug 3 2006, 10:59 AM) [snapback]296985[/snapback]</div>

    Also remember that you don't necissarily need a valid claim in order to have a patent issued... tons of patents are issued for absolute crap all the time. If it ever comes up in court, the judge throws out the patent claim because of prior art or what ever.
     
  13. spwolf

    spwolf Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    3,156
    440
    0
    Location:
    Eastern Europe
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Ken Cooper @ Feb 9 2006, 09:11 AM) [snapback]206232[/snapback]</div>
    Toyota did.
     
  14. jono

    jono New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    3
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(spwolf @ Aug 17 2006, 07:14 PM) [snapback]304964[/snapback]</div>
    Toyota did what?
     
  15. clett

    clett New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    537
    19
    0
    Location:
    Scotland
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Ford may have been first with the planetary gearset in the Model-T...

    ....but they still have to license certain parts of HSD technology from Toyota for use in Escape etc.

    Strange world.... :rolleyes:

    Anyway, all of this bickering will be a distant memory when series hybrids make their appearance (way more simple and efficient and no need for a PSD).
     
  16. Charles Suitt

    Charles Suitt Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    1,637
    16
    0
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    :rolleyes: Seems I recall that an "almost U.S. President" claims to have invented the Internet.
     
  17. ssamd

    ssamd Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    2
    0
    0
    Location:
    Hancock, me
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Premium
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Charles Suitt @ Sep 12 2006, 03:19 PM) [snapback]318541[/snapback]</div>
    If you believe that than maybe you should wonder about where your news is coming from, check out the true. http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp
     
  18. Marlin

    Marlin New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    1,407
    10
    0
    Location:
    Bucks County, PA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(points and plugs @ Sep 13 2006, 09:13 AM) [snapback]318870[/snapback]</div>
    He may have not actually claimed to have "invented" the internet, but he did strongly imply that it's existance and growth is due to him.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE("Al Gore")</div>
    Snopes equates that statement with a hypothetical statement by President Eisenhower stating that he "created the Interstate Highway System". In Eisenhower's case, that would be a fairly accurate statement, in that he and Congress had to wield a considerable amount of tax money and political clout to make an interstate highway system come into reality in the timeframe that it did.

    However, in Gore's case, do you really believe that Gore, Congress, or any political entity had a significant impact on the growth of the Internet in the 90s? Do you really believe that you are here reading PriusChat due to the efforts of Gore and Congress?

    The closest you could come to giving credit to Congress, Gore, or Clinton is that they specifically chose to stay out of the way, and passed some moritoriums on taxes on internet sales transactions (treating it like mail order). Does staying out of the way allow Gore to claim credit for the internet's growth?
     
  19. nerfer

    nerfer A young senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    2,507
    237
    28
    Location:
    Chicagoland, IL, USA, Earth
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Marlin @ Sep 13 2006, 09:10 AM) [snapback]318894[/snapback]</div>
    Not in the 90's, but before that it was part of a thing called "ARPANET", (Advanced Research Projects Agency, later called DARPA for Defense ...), primarily for .mil, .gov and .edu domains. Once it reached critical mass, connected with BitNet, NSFNet etc. and was exposed to enough college students and professors, then it took a life of its own, especially when CERN, a government research agency in Switzerland, developed hypertext and the web browser in the early 90's. So our government and other governments (and some pseudo-independent agencies, like InterNIC, set up by NSF for domain registration) have had an integral part in the development of the internet. If it had been done by private companies, it would more closely resemble the cell-phone industry, with multiple standards, some analog, some digital, and equipment from one system couldn't be used on another.
    The U.S. government still has limited control over the internet. Domain names for instance. Despite calls from various places, proposals for TLDs like .sex or .xxx have been denied, and some speculate it's because of the Puritan stance of our current government. Even though it could be used to more easily segregate that type of content.
    I remember the days when any commercial activity was taboo on the internet. You couldn't tell people in a newsgroup (like this) that you were selling a book, even if it was on-topic, much less take credit-card orders. What a change since then! That had already changed by the time I put up my first website in 1995 using a new 14,400 baud modem.
     
  20. richard schumacher

    richard schumacher shortbus driver

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    7,663
    1,041
    0
    Location:
    United States
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Correct. Without Gore's ARPANET enabling legislation we might now be communicating via dialup through the only BBS in the United States, and paying user fees to its owner and operator Microsoft.