1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Featured The Story Behind the Birth of the Prius

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by Tideland Prius, Aug 8, 2018.

  1. Tideland Prius

    Tideland Prius Moderator of the North
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    45,024
    16,242
    41
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    This is basically a Coles' Notes version of "The Prius That Shook The World" (a book that should be read by any Prius enthusiast).

    Part 1:
    The Story Behind the Birth of the Prius, Part 1 | TOYOTA Global Newsroom

    Part 2:
    The Story Behind the Birth of the Prius, Part 2 | TOYOTA Global Newsroom



    It is not a stretch to say that for many people, the word "Prius" comes to mind when they hear the word "hybrid." The Prius has become so widely known that it is nearly synonymous with hybrid cars.

    But what's the story behind the Prius? Just how did this revolution in car-making begin?

    We spoke to Satoshi Ogiso, the only person to have worked on the Prius from the project planning stage all the way through to the current fourth generation. He told us about what led to the development of the very first Prius.

    G21: It all started with the G21 project
    "It was the summer of 1993," recalls Ogiso. "Eiji Toyoda, honorary chairman at the time, urged us to start thinking about a new vision for cars, one for the medium and long term that would prepare us for the 21st century. That's when we started the first study that would lead to the Prius."

    Chairman Shoichiro Toyoda agreed with the plan to develop a new vision for cars and lent his support. The initial study commenced in September under the codename "G21." "G" stood for "Globe" and "21" for the 21st century, a fitting moniker for a project whose main aim was to conceive a car for the new century. The project team consisted of 10 engineers and designers, working off a blank slate on research for a next-generation mass production passenger car.

    "One of the initial challenges was how to define this vague concept of a car for the 21st century," recalls Ogiso. "We couldn't rely on conventional methods, and since we couldn't adopt a market-oriented approach, we decided to propose a whole new technology."

    By the end of 1993, the project team had compiled an initial report outlining the concept for a 21st century car. It was compact, but roomy, with a long wheelbase and a fuel efficiency of 20 kilometers per liter. With the report approved, the initial project team disbanded.

    Soon afterwards, the G21 project resumed under a new structure led by current Chairman Takeshi Uchiyamada, then a member of the Technical Administration Division. The new mandate was to advance the research as a full-time undertaking.

    [​IMG]

    G21 was officially launched on February 1, 1994. In addition to chassis, body, engine, and driveline engineers, production engineering staff joined the project. This wasn't a team built just for research: it was a team that could take an idea from design to production. They started by revisiting the fundamental question of "What is a car for the 21st century?" The discussion revolved around the environment, energy, and safety. By 1993, Toyota had already made great technological strides in car safety. Project members agreed that Toyota was now ready to face head-on the burgeoning issues of energy resources, global warming, and air pollution. The keywords behind G21 would be "resources" and "environment." The initial research team's notion of a compact car with a wide interior and excellent fuel efficiency reemerged as a core development concept.

    "We thought about what kind of a car would match our concept from every angle possible," says Ogiso. "Would it be an ultra-compact car seating one or two people, or a large car with great fuel efficiency that could have greater benefit for the environment as a whole? In the midst of those discussions, we also considered the powertrain."

    The early 1990s was a period in which carmakers around the world were striving toward a next-generation powertrain as the promise of electric drive was emerging. At this stage, however, the G21 project team didn't consider a hybrid system powered by an electric motor to be feasible. It was a hot topic, but the technology hadn't been proven.

    "Even then, we practiced Toyota's current approach toward the environment, namely that no matter how good a car's performance is, if the technology isn't widely adopted, it can't benefit society," Ogiso notes. "At the time, we saw the hybrid as a technology that couldn't be achieved by the start of the 21st century. The whole team shared that outlook."

    The G21 team settled on a direct-injection engine with a highly efficient automatic transmission that could raise fuel efficiency to 1.5 times a similar car in its class.

    Then, the project's direction took a major turn.

    Double the fuel efficiency!
    In November 1994, Akihiro Wada, the executive vice president for technology, instructed G21 leader Takeshi Uchiyamada to make the next-generation car a hybrid. Wada emphasized if that wasn't possible, the project would be axed.

    "At first, we were told to plan a hybrid version of the next-generation car as just a concept car for a motor show," relates Ogiso. "But gradually, the voices for making a production hybrid car grew stronger. Uchiyamada thought at the time it would be impossible to develop a production hybrid before the start of the 21st century."

    Despite the doubts, a consensus grew that it would be meaningless to debut a 21st century car with a 20th century powertrain. Suddenly, the project faced a towering development hurdle.

    "Fuel efficiency 1.5 times the conventional car wasn't good enough―we needed to double it," says Ogiso. "And we knew that was impossible with conventional methods, so the only answer was hybrid technology. If we weren't up to that task, G21 had no reason to exist."

    Studies on a new hybrid system began in 1995. At the time, there were no accepted theories for proven hybrid systems, so the team's only option was to consider a range of hybrid systems and choose the best from among them.

    Ogiso recalls the technical challenge. "We studied various systems for about six months from the end of 1994, before deciding that the two-motor type was the best option because of the high fuel efficiency potential. We assumed that power electronics (semiconductors and electronic circuits used to efficiently control power) would make leaps in the near future. There was a lot of promise here. The conventional transmission could be completely eliminated. And yet, the technological hurdles remained high."

    [​IMG]
    The system adopted by the team would later come to be known as the Toyota Hybrid System (THS), featuring two motors in addition to the engine. The drive motor would boost engine output while acting as a generator during deceleration to charge the batteries. The second motor would use the drive power of the engine to generate electricity as well as control the transmission. It would also be used as a starter motor. A power split device with planetary gears would connect the two motors with the engine. The input shaft and output shaft would be on the same plane to make the car more compact. The engine output would be divided between driving the vehicle and power generation, and the continuously variable transmission (CVT) would control engine speed. An inverter would also be placed between the battery and motor. This would convert the current between the direct current batteries and the alternating current synchronous motors.

    The G21 team worked on the development of a concept car for the Tokyo Motor Show alongside their development of the production car.

    "The system installed in the concept car featured a single motor, direct-injection engine, and CVT," recalls Ogiso. "There was a capacitor instead of batteries, and the targeted fuel efficiency was 30 kilometers per liter. Technically, it was a hybrid, but we called it the Toyota Energy Management System, or EMS, instead. We had already decided to use two motors for the new hybrid system, so we wanted to clearly differentiate the two cars. We did, however, start using the model name Prius from this stage."

    [​IMG]
    Internal development of core technologies
    The G21 team got the official go-ahead for the production car at a meeting in June 1995. Their first task was to create a prototype, and the initial steps would be to select the right engine and develop the motors and batteries.

    Traditionally, in-house creation has been the guiding force in Toyota's acquisition and nurturing of its core technologies. The team didn't want to relegate itself to a mere vehicle assembler by outsourcing development of a key hybrid component like the motor. They also decided to develop the inverter internally. This also couldn't be an outsourced "black box" technology because it would control the hybrid system. For the battery system, the team decided to collaborate with Matsushita Battery Industrial Co. Ltd., with which it had collaborated on electric vehicle research.

    "For the prototype, we were working off a completely blank slate," says Ogiso. "We started by assembling the basic parts and testing them. Each one was tested on a test bench and then we incorporated computer programs. None of the major components had a track record, so it was a real challenge making that first car."

    The goal was getting the car to market before the start of the 21st century. Time wasn't on their side. Beyond the hybrid system, there were many other tasks to deal with. The design had yet to be decided and the suspension was an urgent issue.

    In August 1995, Hiroshi Okuda was appointed president of Toyota Motor Corporation. The appointment proved an important event not just for corporate management, but a turning point for hybrid car development, as well.

    Solving each problem, one by one
    At the Tokyo Motor Show in October 1995, the team exhibited the Prius concept car, based on the Toyota Energy Management System (EMS), as planned. Although interest was tepid among the general public, engineers from other car companies took a quiet, but keen, interest in the car. At around the same time, the team was working to finalize the prototype of the production hybrid.

    [​IMG]
    Prius concept car

    "It wasn't until around the beginning of November 1995 that we assembled all the parts into a car," says Ogiso. "But even though it was assembled, we couldn't get it to run."

    This was the first time the team had ever tried to operate the new hybrid system, and they initially had trouble rooting out the cause of the malfunctions. They used analog testers and also analyzed digital signals on computers to work steadily in solving each individual problem.

    "We began working on issues one by one on the test bench, but new issues kept cropping up," Ogiso recalls. "The prototype wasn't a tidy machine. The onboard computers should have been installed in a box, but we couldn't make one small enough at first, so we just lined up the parts on a big steel plate. Everyone called it the 'barbeque board'."

    Even after tests were successfully completed on the test bench, many of the components failed when they were installed in the car. The challenge with the Toyota Hybrid System (THS) was the complexity of the drive system. There were various drive formats. Sometimes the car would drive using just a motor, and at other times, just the engine. There was another mode in which both motor and engine operated at the same time. The computer calculated the most efficient driving mode. There was never a simple reason or solution to address why the prototype was not operating. Pinpointing the cause of a problem typically involved checking different combinations of parts.

    "It took us 49 days to get the prototype operating," says Ogiso. "Even then, the driving was awkward and inconsistent. After 500 meters, it just stopped altogether. Yet, it was very emotional for all of us to see it run and know that we had at least got it running before the end of the year."

    Nonetheless, the prototype was a long way from production. The team still needed to achieve double the fuel efficiency of a conventional car, improve drivability, and ensure durability. Even with these challenges left to solve, it was time for the project to prepare for mass production. The team would have to increase development speed to meet the sales and production target by the end of 1998.

    With time running out, the team was astounded by a management decision to accelerate the project by a year and aim for release in 1997.

    The Third Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP3) was scheduled to be held in Kyoto in December 1997. Management had decided to time the Prius release to coincide with COP3 and leverage the wave of media attention that a hybrid car could garner around an environmental conference. The Prius represented a tangible solution to the need for a dramatic reduction in CO2 emissions. It was a global game-changer for the environment. However, another factor was even more significant.

    "All the major carmakers were developing electrified cars," recalls Ogiso in explaining the biggest reason for the new target. "There were a lot of hybrid cars at the motor shows, and we knew that competitors were involved in R&D. In the annals of car history, there are many examples of companies falling victim to rivals after missing a narrow window of opportunity, even while in a hurry. The environment was a critically important theme to carmakers, and we couldn't afford to take second place."

    Taking a prototype that could run only 500 meters and turning it into a production vehicle in two years was no easy task. The team still faced a mountain of problems to solve. The performance of the nickel-hydride batteries was half the estimated level, and their size was double the design. The hybrid system charged and discharged the batteries frequently, and the team had to prevent the memory effect from shortening the batteries' lifespan. During test drives, the batteries would frequently die, forcing a redesign in battery life control. Moreover, battery quality control would become more complex during mass production, when 240 cells would need to be connected in series.

    Batteries weren't the only major issue. A core component of the inverter was a semiconductor module known as an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT). The IGBT was designed to switch large amounts of current at high speed, but there was the challenge of overheating during operation. Since the module worked in conjunction with the engine, a source of heat, the team needed to find a cooling method. Bench tests, however, resulted in repeated overheating and explosions. For production, it would be necessary to both raise the switching speed and ensure breakdown endurance.

    The team solved these difficult technical challenges but still faced an unsure road ahead.

    "During test drives, we knew that the prototypes didn't have good fuel efficiency. In fact, fuel efficiency was worse than a standard Corolla," says Ogiso. "The new equipment we were adding was using a lot of electricity for cooling. The electrical load was about three times that of a normal car, which lowered the fuel efficiency. Finding ways to lower the load was a tough task."

    For motor development, the team benefitted from experience with the RAV4 EV. Now, they needed to customize the design for mass production. For an EV, only the motor sat beneath the hood. The Prius required the motor to be installed alongside the engine. It would have to be ultra-compact to fit. The team chose a NZ-style engine designed for a compact car. The Atkinson cycle design improved thermal efficiency and raised fuel efficiency. Though engine output would be low, the motor could compensate to boost torque. During driving, however, there was excessive vibration when the engine restarted from a complete stop. The vibration was all the more noticeable because of the quiet motor operation in driving mode. This became a new roadblock to production.

    [​IMG]
    Engine compartment of the first-generation Prius

    "We had a lot of issues to solve," notes Ogiso. "Just when we solved one, another one cropped up, and we didn't see how we could meet mass production in two years. That's when we turned to a development method called simultaneous engineering (SE) to speed up the processes. It was a way to solve many issues at the same time. We collaborated with the production engineering divisions to ready the car for mass production, even from a stage where the car wasn't operating properly."

    The Prius would ultimately be manufactured on a mass production line, so it was important to incorporate the needs of genba (on-site) production divisions from an early stage. This mitigated the need for unnecessary changes to the design at latter stages, when the design division sent drawings to the production divisions for review.

    No turning back
    In March 1996, veteran engineer Takehisa Yaegashi was appointed leader of the hybrid system team. Even with his talents to bolster the development structure, the G21 members were in a race against time. They weren't confident that the deadline at the end of 1997 could be met. Amid the anxiety, the development team was stunned by the company's announcement at a media briefing on March 25, 1997 at a hotel in Akasaka, Tokyo.

    At a technology announcement for THS, President Okuda boldly announced in his opening remarks that Toyota had successfully developed a hybrid system as an answer to the 21st century's environmental problems. The press release promised about twice the fuel efficiency of a conventional car and a new hybrid model within the year. Ogiso couldn't conceal his surprise the next day when he saw the newspaper coverage.

    "The media was reporting that THS could get 28 kilometers to the liter and the price would be ¥500,000 more than the Corolla even though we hadn't released any specific figures at the press conference," recalls Ogiso. "We hadn't yet reached 28 kilometers per liter, and we couldn't say at that time that it was attainable. The company had decided to launch in December 1997, and at that juncture, not everything was going according to plan. There was a point earlier in the project where we had asked management to postpone the launch if development became too difficult. But now that the schedule was announced to the public, there was no turning back."

    By August 1997, testing was nearly complete. A dedicated line began producing prototypes at the Takaoka Plant from September. The engineers were reassigned to the plant to make design changes and pave the way for production. The design and development team had involved the production division in the project at an early stage, which kept the late-stage design changes to a minimum.

    Just in time for the 21st century
    The press conference to unveil the Prius was held October 14, 1997 at a hotel in Roppongi, Tokyo. The conference room was filled with not only auto industry journalists, but also the general media. The proudest accomplishment of the team was the achievement of 28 kilometers per liter under the Japanese 10-15 test cycle. They had met their promise of delivering double the fuel efficiency of a similar gasoline engine car. What's more, the price tag of ¥2.15 million was even lower than what the media had reported back in March.

    [​IMG]
    First-generation Toyota Prius

    The announcement sparked public interest in the Prius at the Tokyo Motor Show held from October 22, drawing throngs of visitors to get a glimpse of the car. The Prius was named Japan Car of the Year in 1997 by an overwhelming margin of nearly 200 votes separating it from second place. At the COP3 conference in December, the Prius was used to taxi participants between venues. The global media was captivated, peppering Toyota executives and engineers with questions about the car. A new advertising campaign accompanied the debut, with the catchphrase "Just in time for the 21st century" to emphasize the Prius's position as a car to usher in the next century. The G21 project had ended with a resounding success.

    "The line-off ceremony went smoothly on December 10," says Ogiso. "Our original sales plan was 1,000 units a month in Japan. The initial orders were large, and we expanded capacity after that, averaging production of about 1,500 units a month for the first generation. We had no idea whether it would sell or not, so it felt good to see sales of over 1,000 units a month. We had originally planned to debut the Prius in Europe and North America from 2000 along with the partial redesign, so there was still a lot of work left after sales began. We had developed a hybrid from scratch in a little more than two years, so we thought the next model in two years' time would be easy. However, we needed to make the Prius ready for high-speed operation in Europe and for temperatures of up to 50 degrees Celsius in Death Valley in the United States. And with the partial redesign, we decided to make major changes to the hybrid system, so we didn't have the luxury of time."

    [​IMG]
    Line-off ceremony for first-generation Toyota Prius

    Hybrid car sales exceed 10 million units
    The Prius remained in the spotlight after the launch, with orders in the initial month of sales reaching 3,500 units, three times the target. The ¥2.15 million price tag may have been less than the market expected, but it was significantly higher than other cars in its class. Despite this, the flood of orders reflected the excitement among environmentally conscious consumers.

    The first completely redesigned Prius arrived in 2003, and the monthly sales target was reset to 5,000 units. Again, consumer clamor for the new model outstripped projections, with global monthly sales surpassing 10,000 units. Hollywood stars were seen arriving for red carpet events in their Priuses, further raising interest among consumers concerned about the environment.

    [​IMG]
    Second-generation Toyota Prius

    "The first-generation Prius made a splash, but it was still a niche car that was far from the mainstream," notes Ogiso. "There were discussions inside the company on whether we really needed to release a second generation. However, after listening to consumers, we realized that the reaction among consumers in the know (in regard to the environment) in Japan and the United States was positive. The second generation represented the next evolution of the hybrid system, improving both fuel efficiency and drivability, and succeeded in further raising the Prius's presence in the global market."

    The development teams continued to develop the Prius, and by the fourth generation released in 2015, the car boasted fuel efficiency of more than 40 kilometers per liter. By then, nearly half the cars sold by Toyota in Japan were hybrid cars, and by the end of January 2017, cumulative Toyota hybrid car sales had exceeded 10 million units.

    [​IMG]
    Fourth-generation Toyota Prius

    "The acquisition and nurturing of core technologies through in-house creation made a big difference with profound benefits that can be seen to this day," says Ogiso in looking back on the Prius achievement. "When you have the same people working for years within the same company who develop a discerning eye for technology, it makes a tremendous difference in the product you deliver. The Prius development experience played a pivotal role in the development of the Mirai fuel cell vehicle launched in 2014. After working on projects for 20 years, you get an instinct for anticipating what needs to be done next. Looking back at those early days of my career working on Prius development, I recall the pure agony of the challenges we faced, and yet I feel the work continues today."

    Present day
    The Prius, having overcome so many challenges, turned 20 years old in 2017. The experience gained from acquiring and nurturing core technologies through in-house creation has contributed to the development of new technology in cooperation with suppliers. For the fourth-generation Prius, performance improvement and cost reduction of each unit was realized with the cooperation of various suppliers. The Prius has been beloved and fostered by so many drivers around the world and will continue to evolve as a pioneer paving the way for cars in the future. Drive on, Prius.


    Satoshi Ogiso
    Satoshi Ogiso was born in Tokyo in 1961. He joined Toyota Motor Corporation in 1983 and initially worked in the Chassis Engineering Division designing suspensions mainly for front-engine, front-wheel-drive vehicles. After working on advanced platform development, he joined the G21 project in 1993 as a founding member. He was involved in product planning and development of the first-, second-, and third-generation Prius as well as the Prius Alpha and Prius PHV. He also joined the iQ development team midway through the project. In 2007, he took charge of Aqua development as development leader from the product planning stage. He also served as the chief engineer for next-generation environmental cars (HV/PHV/EV/FCV). In April 2013, he was appointed managing officer of Toyota Motor Corporation, and in June 2015, he was appointed president of Advics Co., Ltd.

    [​IMG]
    Satoshi Ogiso
     
  2. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    20,174
    8,353
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    Well - not to come across too contradictory, but you know what they say, history is always recounted by the winner, whether it be Custer's Last Stand, World War II, or who came up with a great idea.
    Some would say the Prius came about because of the earlier GM concept car - 1st revealed in 1990 at one of the big Auto shows. That it scared Toyota $h1tless. They displayed a hybrid version as well as all electric - calling it, the Impact.


    So troubled by what Toyota oberved as falling behind - allegedly Toyota 'borrowed' some AdvancedTech from a certain Russian hybrid technology inventor, who later - successfully sued Toyota over his ideas.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2010/07/alex-severinsky-toyota/amp#ampshare=https://www.wired.com/2010/07/alex-severinsky-toyota/
    It has been estimated that Alex gets about $100 for every Lexus, Toyota, and Ford hybrid made. Then?
    Time Marches backward.

    Some 40 years ago Victor Wouk, my favorite inventor won a big sum of cash from the EPA - putting a system in a giant Oldsmobile back in the 70s. Certainly no history record can be complete - without mentioning his great work. Many consider him the father of the hybrid - as his offering was incapable of relying on computers because computer controls were still in their infancy. Even so his system worked - good old-fashioned American ingenuity.

    [​IMG]
    Victor Wouk and The Great Hybrid Car Cover-up of 1974

    There were a few much less efficient, much more Hokie inventors even earlier, too. None took off like the Prius though. The timing was just right, what with higher fuel costs.

    No history is complete - w/out the little details.

    .
     
    #2 hill, Aug 8, 2018
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2018
  3. jerrymildred

    jerrymildred Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    11,518
    14,128
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Great history stuff!! Thanks, @Tideland Prius and @hill.

    I was going to bring up Wouk. I saw a fascinating doumentary on his hybrid invention a few months ago. I think it was on Amazon Prime. Amazing at how efficient and clean of a rig he was able to come up with using what was available back then. And then, after FINALLY getting the EPA to test it and blowing them away with it, they and the car makers just went, "Meh!" and walked away.
     
  4. HV Battery

    HV Battery New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2018
    22
    6
    0
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Great Article!! everyone should read!

    Must have been some really smart guys involved in the engineering of the hybrid system
     
    ANDRAS RIMELY, SPB-CH and donbright like this.
  5. El Dobro

    El Dobro A Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    7,027
    3,241
    1
    Location:
    NJ
    Vehicle:
    Other Electric Vehicle
    Model:
    N/A
    Victor Wouk's hybrid.
     
  6. Leadfoot J. McCoalroller

    Leadfoot J. McCoalroller Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2018
    7,430
    6,913
    1
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
  7. jerrymildred

    jerrymildred Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    11,518
    14,128
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    That looks like the one I saw a while back. I loved it.
     
    smilyme likes this.
  8. JMRanger

    JMRanger Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2018
    6
    4
    1
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Interesting read & watch, but you can't really talk about the Prius birth without talking about the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV) program (this account is too new to post links, but look it up on Wikipedia).
    The short version is that in 1993, the US government wanted to have VERY fuel-efficient cars within years. Significant R&D subsidies were available - but only for domestic manufacturers. Foreign car companies had to fund their own R&D - or risk being left behind with uncompetitive products, should the program be a success.
    By the time the big three managed to get the program killed (wikipedia says 2001, but I heard the late 1990s previously):
    • the big three had AMAZING prototypes with mind-boggling MPG numbers (I have a soft spot for the Intrepid ESX)
    • and Toyota had the Prius (and Honda had the first Insight)
    The program got killed... but Toyota & Honda kept going and started mass production.
     
  9. Leadfoot J. McCoalroller

    Leadfoot J. McCoalroller Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2018
    7,430
    6,913
    1
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
    That PNGV wiki is a nice read. I liked it, thanks for sharing!

    Can you imagine how bad the auto industry would have freaked out if they'd been asked for efficient light trucks instead??
     
  10. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    22,447
    11,760
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    While they may have claimed that, it wasn't quite true.

    Japan's MITI had a LEV program looking to reduce vehicle emissions. Its beginnings may date back to the 1970's. It supported research in BEVs and hybrids. It has influenced Japan's, and Toyota's, stance on hydrogen FCEVs. The BEV research happened when NiMH was bleeding edge for batteries. The institutional group think that BEVs will only work for short range city cars there stems from those cars using lead acid and NiMH packs. Perhaps under another program, the Prius was receiving a subsidy for sales since its introduction in Japan.
     
    salyavin and austingreen like this.
  11. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    20,174
    8,353
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    Jeez !!! it just dawned on me - this thread has totally neglected to give prof's to THE main man ... Professor Andy Frank, who, along w/ his students, made proof-of-concept vehicles - plug-in's - way back, nearly 2 decades ago. This was even as Toyota was poo poo'ing the notion of plugin's, saying "no one wants them". The Andy Frank team proved that one of THE most massive land barge GM SUV's could out mpg even a prius, once it was converted to a plugin.
    Dr. Andrew Frank - EAA-PHEV
    Even the MOST massive SUV, an old 15mpg (at best) GM Suburban could get 30mpg once Andy's team did their magic;

    Professor Frank .... One of the true hybrid heroes - in my book.
    .
     
    #11 hill, Oct 29, 2018
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2018
  12. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,602
    4,136
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Do you mean like the 1998-2002 BEV ford ranger?
    Ford Ranger EV - Wikipedia

    PHEV should probably have been the goal of these car companies, but ... In 1999 some started using panasonic nimh batteries, partially funded by miti research. The nimh ovonics battery pack in 1997 for experiment was good enough for phevs, but the volume phev would wait until the volt in 2010. Patent infringement meant that panasonic could not make their large batteries without the ovonics patents.

    The goals of pgnv meant diesel hybrids that could not meet EPA emissions by the time the car companies produced them.

    +1
    I'd say the main proof of concept was the 1996 phev taurus modified in 1997 to a phev with a 15.4 kwh ovonics nimh battery pack.
    http://www.crcarlson.com/Academia/UCDavis/1997TechReportJoule.pdf
     
  13. Leadfoot J. McCoalroller

    Leadfoot J. McCoalroller Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2018
    7,430
    6,913
    1
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
    Fascinating! Never saw these before. If they made them today I'd be incredibly tempted.

    Enter the cynic: of course Ford used a Ranger. Part of the Ranger's job was to jump on any grenade that might get near the F-150.
     
    austingreen likes this.
  14. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,602
    4,136
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A

    Ford will have a 2020 F-150 phev (probably released about a year from now). Phev is probably better way to go on a pick up than bev, given the state of batteries and charging infrastructure today. Remember it is much harder to get good highway efficiency on a pick up but when batteries get cheap, who knows. Bill Ford said they are looking at a BEV pick up also though its farther out in the future. A key element of the phev pick up truck is the ability to plug in tools and other electronics while stopped, a key desire of F series pick up owners that they surveyed.
     
  15. Leadfoot J. McCoalroller

    Leadfoot J. McCoalroller Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2018
    7,430
    6,913
    1
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
    Some truck buyers have always wanted a power take-off option. A modern electric one (vs. classic driveshaft) is the right way to do it now, no question. What remains up in the air is the implementation- lots of power? A little? Voltage and frequency flexibility? Connector type and location? As usual, the devil is in the details.

    Next up on my list: an actual utilitarian truck. You know, painted metal visible in the cabin, radio entirely optional... essentially a highway-legal all weather garden tractor. I'm sick of the Colony Park Brougham living rooms on 3/4t frames and their near-6-figure pricetags.
     
    austingreen likes this.
  16. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    22,447
    11,760
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    GM had a S10 BEV out during the same time, too.
     
  17. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    20,174
    8,353
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    iirc - weren't all the Rangers lead acid? We had a fleet of ~10 Chevy S-10 Ev's at Disney back in the late 90's - they were Ovionic/Panisonic Nickel packs with ~90 reliable miles of range ... & a mini diesel fuel tank used for cabin heat.
    Edit
    yea, what he said
    ;)
    .
     
  18. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,602
    4,136
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    You Could Be Driving an All-Electric Ford Ranger EV Today!
    They started out lead acid (PbA) then switched to Panasonic Nimh.
     
  19. Castanea

    Castanea Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    39
    27
    0
    Location:
    Iowa
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
    You are making me miss the early 70's Toyota pickup I used to drive (and love; I miss that truck!). They were pretty spartan. Mine looked a lot like the one in this video clip, complete with about that amount of body rust. Those were the days.

    Kind of back on topic, thank you all for this thread. I downloaded the PDF and am about halfway through reading it, with enjoyment. Among other things, it is fascinating to get a glimpse of Toyota corporate culture, as well as some of the background of the Prius.
     
  20. theroman

    theroman Junior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2015
    1
    0
    0
    Location:
    kiev
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    love this thread, so interesting to read! Pls keep up!