Routers in areas perceived to have bad IP addresses shouldn't be discriminated against either. Posted via the PriusChat mobile app.
Apparently it is OK to discriminate against packets that are implementing https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt AKA the 'evil bit'
Unfortunately at work, we currently advertise our assigned addresses but ignore them as far as I know. My son & I would like to use IPv6 (he set up the dual stack network where he works) but our ISP (Shentel) does not support IPv6. BTW, I emphasized the humor tag to keep this out of FHOPolitics. It would be humorous for some clueless Democrat to insist on a congressional investigation, though.
Funny you should mention Shentel! I had a weird support email to answer that I suspected was about a non-supported device. I whois'd the IP, which was in their block. Sender must have been ESL. Posted via the PriusChat mobile app.
I understand they are in the cellular business too. Sprint affiliate Shentel buys fellow wholesale partner nTelos for $640M | FierceWireless
Sprint probably makes more money off of MVNOs (including Boost & Virgin Mobile US) than it does from its own customers. Posted via the PriusChat mobile app.
I have been told that. I had all my service with Ting for quite a while first on Sprint and then T-Mobile. Those networks both have spotty service in my area so I move all but my home phone to my son’s Verizon plan.
