1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

America's favorite drug addict in trouble again.

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by JackDodge, Jun 27, 2006.

  1. livelychick

    livelychick Missin' My Prius

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    1,085
    0
    0
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Jun 28 2006, 09:44 AM) [snapback]278007[/snapback]</div>
    And there you are...running to the defense of a doofus simply because he spouts right-wing vitriole. Birds of a feather, I suppose.

    Of course I'm not surprised!
     
  2. wstander

    wstander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    982
    1
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(livelychick @ Jun 27 2006, 07:37 PM) [snapback]277810[/snapback]</div>
    Nope, not possible.

    If it were true, then GWB would have won not only the electoral vote, but the popular vote in a landslide B)

    When i just read the header, I thought it was about steroid abuse :lol:
     
  3. daronspicher

    daronspicher Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    1,208
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(livelychick @ Jun 28 2006, 09:35 AM) [snapback]278026[/snapback]</div>
    Did you even read my post before you replied?

    Where did I run to the defense of anyone? I simply stated that the facts boiled out to where the guy didn't do anything illegal, and I also stated that I hoped the guy cracks them with a big lawsuit for the defamation that was brought because some idiot was so eager to leak this thing to the media before the 'detaining' agencies could get a chance to say... Whoops, 'bad detention, no infraction'.

    I hope he decides to sue and I hope he wins... As much as I dislike someone such as Sean Penn, if it were him being harassed and defamed by these idiots, I'd hope he sues and wins.

    New commentary:

    It is different if it were you or I 'detained' for the same offense. First of all, no idiot would be chomping the bit to 'leak' this to the media because the media doesn't know who you or I are. They wouldn't care, and there would be no defamation involved. Secondly, it would be highly unlikely that you or I would be detained for that same bottle of viagra. If we were, someone would call the doctor and find out it's ok and that would be the end of it.

    The reason I hope he sues and wins is because there are a lot of people out there saying a lot of really big stuff and not being held accountable for it. Papers that commit treason under the guidelines of journalism should taste the fruits of prosecution for treason. If it's not treason then they should not. Be careful with your first amendment rights. Just because you have a big mouth and a 1st amendment, doesn't mean that you have no consequences for what you say.

    If I stand outside McDonalds and yak and yell about the rats and roaches in the kitchen, it's my first amendment right to talk away. It's also their right to sue me for loss of reputation and revenue. If I get to court and have no evidence for the things I was saying with my big mouth then hopefully McDonalds wins a compensatory judgement against me.

    In the same way, until it was confirmed that Rush did something wrong with those pills, no one had the right to yak about it to the media, the media had no right to publish, etc.. They did, and I believe he should sue for loss of reputation and the revenue he will lose because of loss of reputation (he makes every $$ based on reputation). Why did they just spout a lie about illegal viagra? Why didn't they make up some other things and tell the newspaper he was drunk and wearing ladies underwear?

    They were over eager to hurt his fame and reputation, so they spoke out of turn. I hope he stuffs it back on them like a mountain landslide takes out a village below.

    I don't listen to Rush... I might if I could get the condensed commercial free version... 8 minutes of commercials coming on every 12 minutes is more than I can handle no matter what the content.
     
  4. imntacrook

    imntacrook New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    289
    0
    0
    Location:
    On the Beach
    I thought this post was about the Kennedy Clan - sorry
     
  5. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(imntacrook @ Jun 29 2006, 07:02 PM) [snapback]278916[/snapback]</div>
    ....................................................:lol: LOL! :lol:..................................................
     
  6. JackDodge

    JackDodge Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    2,366
    4
    0
    Location:
    Bloomfield Hills, MI
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(livelychick @ Jun 27 2006, 10:37 PM) [snapback]277810[/snapback]</div>
    There are lots of cons out there who are drug addicts, they just don't think of their addictions that way because if a doctor prescribes it, it's not drug abuse. Some skanky South American isn't making money off of them; a pharmaceutical company is but that's ok. :rolleyes:
     
  7. MarinJohn

    MarinJohn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2004
    3,945
    304
    0
    Title should be America's least favorite hypocrite gets caught with his pants down AGAIN.
     
  8. daronspicher

    daronspicher Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    1,208
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MarinJohn @ Jun 30 2006, 11:13 AM) [snapback]279135[/snapback]</div>
    This is about Rush... Not a Kennedy, and definately not Bill Clinton... Get another thread for them.. hahaha..

    :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  9. JackDodge

    JackDodge Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    2,366
    4
    0
    Location:
    Bloomfield Hills, MI
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Jun 30 2006, 01:05 PM) [snapback]279183[/snapback]</div>
    That's true, it's about a con who needs viagra to get it up ;) That's something that Clinton and the Kennedys have never had a problem with. Interesting that cons seem to think that talking about someone who has a real sex drive is somehow a comeback for a con who needs pharmaceutical aids to pretend to have one. The cons are also the ones who seem to think that putting more laughing icons on their silly-a**ed posts will somehow make it funny.
     
  10. Mystery Squid

    Mystery Squid Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2005
    2
    3
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(JackDodge @ Jun 30 2006, 03:11 PM) [snapback]279252[/snapback]</div>
    not nearly as funny, or sad, as someone starting a thread about Rush's balls....

    ...man, even I wouldn't have gone there...

    :lol:
     
  11. hycamguy07

    hycamguy07 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    2,707
    3
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mystery Squid @ Jun 30 2006, 10:56 PM) [snapback]279476[/snapback]</div>
    or how Rush's Penis works, sounds a little funny to me to be concerned about a mans unit.
    :blink: :huh: I guess we just have to look at the thread OP. :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  12. bruceb

    bruceb New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    30
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(JackDodge @ Jun 27 2006, 02:57 PM) [snapback]277502[/snapback]</div>
    If I was married to Hillary, I sure as heck would NEED viagra... ;)
     
  13. daronspicher

    daronspicher Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    1,208
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(bruceb @ Jul 9 2006, 12:52 PM) [snapback]283396[/snapback]</div>
    I've never tried it...

    But I'm sure viagra is not a miracle drug... it can only do so much and I think your challenge here is beyond the ability of science and modern medicine!
     
  14. bruceb

    bruceb New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    30
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Jul 10 2006, 08:03 AM) [snapback]283755[/snapback]</div>
    Point well taken. I stand corrected.... ;)