1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

water useage

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by Bob Allen, Mar 31, 2004.

  1. Bob Allen

    Bob Allen Captainbaba

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    1,273
    11
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    It's interesting how you can get hooked into one particular aspect of environmentalism and find that you are drawn to many other facets of it. Like being a vegetarian because you don't like the meat packing industry, can lead to an appreciation of Buddhism and the sanctity of life everywhere, an appreciation of fine cooking, an awareness of food resources and protein wasteful food production, etc, etc.
    I've been interested in water conservation for quite a while and devised ways around the house to minimize our water useage. My life partner is a dedicated environmentalist as well. I started with something cheap and simple;(we don't have the budget for retrofitting our house with bio-composting toilets, etc, so I was forced to use existing facilities. Putting a sealed quart bottle full of water (or a brick) in the toilet tanks eliminated about three gallons a day. Flushing less often (depending on your sensitivity to this) helped eliminate (so to speak) another five gallons a day. Turning the water off when brushing teeth and while shaving in the shower, reduced the intake by a few gallons a week. Amazing how much water can be wasted if you leave it running while brushing your teeth.
    So........when the time came to get a new car, I thought this would be a rare opportunity to make another environmental leap. Once I decided to spring for a Prius, it was as if every other car on the lot disappeared.
    My second choice was the Jetta TDI Wagon, which my partner drives on fuel he makes in the garage.
    I felt that investing more than I had planned for getting a replacement car in Toyota and the Prius was worth the monetary hit. Sadly, I, like most of us, live in a situation where not having a car is not really an option. I have two jobs and could neither commute on bike nor make my schedule on public transit. Next best thing is to acquire the least consuming vehicle possible....hence the Prius or the TDI. Having both types gives us flexibility in hauling stuff like bikes, and comfortable long trip driving or for times when we need a bigger back seat than the Jetta has.
    I like hearing stories from people out there who are trying to lessen our consumption of resources. We just returned from China, which is a great lesson in politeness, hard work ethics, creativity and conservation.
    Bob
     
  2. bookrats

    bookrats New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    2,843
    2
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    When we did a major remodeled of our house 5 years ago, we did a couple of things to conserve energy, use recycled/renewable materials, and use less water. Some have been more successful than others (much like any engineering project); we learned a lot from the failures as well at the successes.

    One of the real win-win features has been an "on-demand" hot water system we had installed. You know when you turn the hot water on in the morning, and let the water run for 30 seconds (or longer) while it gets hot? All that water gets wasted, and goes down the drain.

    On demand basically puts a water pump in the hot water pipe, with an RF receiver attached to it. You push a RF button in the bathroom, and the pump starts pushing the hot water through the hot water pipes. Wait 15 seconds, turn on the hot water -- and you get hot water.

    If I had it to do over again, I might have just put a pump that runs all the time (like most commercial buildings) and continously circulates the hot water. Suspect this is better for the pump -- but it also uses more power. Tradeoffs, tradeoffs....

    Even for some of the less-successful things we did, it's like Bob says -- we learned a lot of interesting stuff (that we'd never think about otherwise), and it's made us think of other things we can do -- often much simpler, like taking shorter showers and collecting rain water for garden projects.
     
  3. jasond

    jasond New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    165
    0
    0
    Location:
    Boston
    It's shocking how much water you can save just by not flushing the toilet.

    I used to be in the "sensitive" category there, but my baby daughter would wake up from naps when the toilet was flushed, so I quickly adapted.

    If you have a 1.7 gal/flush toilet, avoiding just one flush a day saves 600 gallons a year!
     
  4. cybele

    cybele New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    406
    1
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    As I write this there's a plumber at my house replacing our old 2.4 gallon with a 1.6 gallon per flush toilet. If we like it, we'll replace the other 2.4.

    We just did a major kitchen remodel and in addition to better task lighting (so that we didn't have to have ALL the lights on just to see what we're doing), we put in a new super-efficient dishwasher. It saves water and heats the water, so we're able to turn the house water heater down ten degrees. It also actually works, our old one didn't, which meant washing the dishes before putting them in the dishwasher.

    I'm thinking of getting a cistern/water barrel for collecting winter rains for use in the yard. We don't water much, but we do have some fruit trees that we really are spoiled by (nothing better than fresh plums and figs). Greywater reclamation is interesting, but I'm not sure how I'd implement that in my house ... maybe with water from the dog bath (hey, that's where all that dirt came from anyway) and the washing machine.

    I got rid of the lawn in the front of our house a few years ago, it never really made any sense, just sucked up water. Now I have ornamental grasses and gravel and herbs planted there. It's much easier to care for an requires no watering at all.

    The good news is that even though these things cost money, my figures show that they'll pay for themselves over the long run. Even the little things we did like replacing old mini blinds with lined roman shades has made a huge difference in the heating and cooling in the house (and made it look better, too).

    Living in LA, I know that water will not always be so plentiful and we need to take steps now so that it isn't a hardship when the rationing comes aong.
     
  5. naterprius

    naterprius Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    1,843
    11
    0
    Location:
    USA
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    bookrats, what type of system (brand, make, model, etc) did you put in for your hot water on demand system? I'm thinking of retroing my house with a grundfos system, but it runs on a timer, and I would love a wireless button to turn it on.

    Nate
     
  6. Bob Allen

    Bob Allen Captainbaba

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    1,273
    11
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    I forgot to mention my other big idea: we keep a bucket in the bathtub/shower in each of the two bathrooms. When we turn on the water for a shower, we collect the initial runoff in the bucket until the water gets warm. The bucket can be emptied into the toilet bowl and will cause the toilet to flush. It's not quite as hygenic as using water from the toilet tank, but it saves about three gallons every time you do it. We don't use this method in the guest bathroom downstairs because the bowl doesn't stay as clean looking.
    I have a 55 gallon aquarium. When I do water changes, I siphon the aquaruim water into a watering can which is placed outside the front door in a flower bed. The watering can gets filled with fish water which I use to water house plants, and when the siphon fills up the watering can, the runoff goes into the Jasmine plant outside the front door. The Jasmine is growing like gangbusters and the houseplants are thriving.
    My partner, Lyle, installed a rain collection bucket which he uses to water our garden. Wish we could afford to retrofit our water heaters, etc, with solar but that's about 20k for a really good setup.
    Houseplants help keep your home humidity up; most heating systems tend to dehydrate your house.
    Using these methods, I have cut our home water useage by about ten gallons a day. It does add up. Contrary to popular belief, we do have droughts in the Pacific Northwest, and we are facing severe problems with water conservation and salmon restoration. As our forests get depleted, and global warming cuts down on the snow pack, our watersheds are in increasing danger. Much of the electrical power in this area is generated by water over dams, not good for fish. We have some tough choices to make and I feel we are doing our part.
    As an example of benighted government in action: Seattle Water department issued a request for us to conserve water. Seattlites, being environmentally conscious folks, did a great job. So great a job that the water department actually raised the rates per gallon to recoup the monetary loss they incurred by shipping less water.
    Oregon, I understand, is putting a surtax on the Prius to cover what they believe will be a net loss in fuel tax revenue from this car. Is that STUPID or what??? We should tax what we want more of and subsidize what we want less of........I'm gonna stop now before I get going on Bush's environmental idiocies.
    Bob
     
  7. daniel

    daniel Cat Lovers Against the Bomb

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    14,487
    1,518
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Hmmm. If it's the fuel tax that pays for the roads, SUV drivers might consider Prius drivers to be freeloaders. Not that I give a fig what SUV drivers think, but sometimes it's interesting to look at something from the other person's point of view.
     
  8. bookrats

    bookrats New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    2,843
    2
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    We used the Metlund P-series -- it's built for houses that have a "closed loop" hot water system (i.e., there's a hot water pipe that goes from the hot water heater (in our case, a gas boiler) to all the sinks and showers in the house, and then returns to the boiler.

    I'm not sure this is a common system -- we had our house torn down to the studs, and completely rewired and new plumbing (1908 house -- old for Seattle), so we were able to slip this in.

    Also, it's a 5 year old system -- the Metlund models advertised at their web site are different than the one we got.
     
  9. naterprius

    naterprius Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    1,843
    11
    0
    Location:
    USA
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    bookrats, Thanks for the info.

    Nate
     
  10. Wolfman

    Wolfman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    1,233
    19
    0
    Location:
    Williston, ND.
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    For those wanting to look into solar water heat, and electricity, without forking over the big bux, look at subscribing to home power magazine. It's a great magazine, that details numerous ways to set up such systems without the huge investments.

    www.homepower.com
     
  11. plusaf

    plusaf plusaf

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    324
    5
    0
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    please correct me if i'm wrong, bookrats, but to do what you did requires a return line for the water in your hot water pipes to get back to the hot water heater.

    picture an extra pump in a regular one-way wasteful water line. the pump can't move the water at all. you need essentially a closed LOOP of hot water plumbing from the heater that goes past all places that have hot water taps. in addition, you're doubling (or more) the length of the hot water lines, so they'll need at least twice the insulation that they have on them now (oh, they don't already?... :) )

    a friend of mine had that built into his house in (i think it was) Portola Valley, and i was way jealous of the benefit. unfortunately the house i own would require the return line to go over the roof or under the dirt from the farthest reach of the house, and since each room is not tapped onto one line, i'd need returns from each room with a hot water tap!

    the idea is great, and the timer that runs the pump for just the few needed minutes is the right way to do it, too, but it's not easy to add this to many, if not most houses.

    ps.'s
    i don't have any incandescent lights in my house... they've all been converted to fluorescent over the past few years.

    if and when i afford a solar-electric system for the house, i'm going to add an electric hot water heater to preheat water for the home heating system as well as for domestic hot water, which are currently gas-heated.

    when our hot water heater reached end-of-life some years ago, i had a high-efficiency gas furnace installed which supplies both home heat as well as domestic hot water. i guesstimated the old furnace (from the 50s or 60s) to be maybe 35% efficient; the new one runs in the 80s or 90s, depending on the model, yet can pump enough btu's into the water to keep the shower water reasonably hot... indefinitely! that's a nice tradeoff!

    happy engineering! it's good for the planet!
     
  12. Medved

    Medved New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    128
    0
    0
    Location:
    Willowick, Oh
    I don't really "conserve water". I really never felt the need to. My water bills for my house are about $60.00 every 3 months. That is less than a dollar a day.

    I feel that if you need something, you use it. If my car is dirty, I wash it. If I need to use the rest room, I flush. I think the "heath reason and risk" way out way 2 cents I will save.

    My fiance plants flowers in the front yard every year. We water them reguarly, perhaps every other day if needed. We spend nearly $100.00 a year, in flowers, mulch etc. I could not imagine NOT watering them, and letting them wilt away.

    I am not saying that I am WASTEFULL, please don't get me wrong. I'm just saying that for me personally, its not worth my time. For all of those who do go "above and beyond", more power to you.
     
  13. bookrats

    bookrats New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    2,843
    2
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    [Apologies for the delay in replying -- for some reason I missed your post in May.]

    You're exactly correct -- we do have all the hot water faucets connected to a hot water "closed loop" (good term!), with the pump being radio controlled. Since we were completely replacing all the pipes in the house, it was a feasible solution for us.

    I absolutely agree. However, at least as of 5 years ago, Metlund had another system (the "S" system?) that would work in houses without the "hot water closed loop" -- i.e., something that would work similarly in existing houses.

    All I remember about it was that it wasn't as elegant as the Metlund "P" system we use -- did something like push cold water in the hot water pipe back down the cold water pipe? That doesn't sound mechanically right.

    At any rate, though, Metlund apparently sold a lot of those systems -- for exactly the reason you point out: very few people have the luxury of adding a "hot water closed loop" pipe throughout the house.

    We did something similar (maybe the same): a gas boiler that heats the hot water, but also has a metal heating coil attached which the hot water can run through.

    The heating coil is placed in the air duct; when the thermostat triggers the boiler, hot water is sent through the coil, heating the air that is forced through the duct.

    Very happy with this!
     
  14. neppi

    neppi New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    18
    0
    0
    Bob,
    I work in the Water Conservation Department of a water company in the San Francisco Bay area. I happen to know that the Seattle Water Depatment has an excellent Water Conservation department. If you contact them, they will provide you many useful tips.

    In the mean time, check out the book "Water Use and Conservation, by Amy Vickers.

    You can reach me by email at [email protected].

    Dave
     
  15. rdverb

    rdverb New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    49
    0
    0
    Location:
    Monterey, California
    Metlund does make a recirc system that does not need the return pipes to the DHW heater. It uses a pump that pulls water from the hot and pushes it into the cold until a thermocouple detects hot water. I installed 2 of them in new construction because of their simplicity, no cost for extra piping, and efficiency by avoiding the energy use and radiator effect of a hot water line always hot.

    They work great. You only need one at the longest run from the heater. It can be activated by a little wired or wireless button from nearby fixtures.

    They're located in the midwwest, as I recall and have a good website: http://www.metlund.com/
     
  16. jamarimutt

    jamarimutt New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    985
    5
    0
    No water is really wasted, since all of it is recycled one way or another. The cold water "wasted" down the drain when you first open the hotwater faucet, along with the hot water used to shower, is likely processed at a plant and returned to a lake or river where water is picked up, purified and returned to the house.
     
  17. bookrats

    bookrats New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    2,843
    2
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Depends on how you look at "wasted".

    Here in the Pacific NW, we have many demands on our fresh water (particularly river water) supplies (depending on where in the state you live):
    • Drinking/residential use
    • Commercial use
    • Power generation (via dams)
    • Wildlife (salmon in particular)

      • When we have water shortages, due to smaller supply from melting snowpacks, they have to make decisions as to what to use the available water for. And (no surprise) the Wildlife often gets stinted in these situations.

        So anything people can do to reduce demand provides more water for the other "options". The local Seattle water company asked households to reduce water demand because of (relative) drought conditions a few years ago. We did it!

        (And then the water comany raised their rates to cover the income they weren't getting. :guns: )
     
  18. jchu

    jchu New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    1,063
    0
    0
    Location:
    Nampa, ID
    Your observation is technically correct, however (bet you heard that coming), no always true from a practical standpoint. As Bookrats points out water and water rights attached to property in the Northwest is a big issue. In addition to Bookrats points, while much water is returned, the return is downstream and in Idaho that is often not helpful to us. At 11 inches of rainfall total a year, we are extremely dependant on snowpack, and have had several straight years of drought conditions.

    Lack of potable water is a major issue in many parts of the world and has been the unspoken basis for many of the conflicts in third world regions.
     
  19. tanteb & rgrpick

    tanteb & rgrpick New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    95
    1
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wolfman @ Apr 2 2004, 07:16 PM) [snapback]9543[/snapback]</div>

    years later, from a newbie, thanks.
     
  20. daronspicher

    daronspicher Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    1,208
    0
    0
    I think there is enough people on this thread saving water to balance out the universe. I would guess I use about 30,000 gallons a month, so if you all save a few gallons each, we can maintain the balance.

    I water the heck out of my garden, grass and trees. Easily 1000 gallons a day when I figure 5 gallons a minute only takes a little over 3 hours and I let the sprinklers run most nights all night and some days most of the day too.