And these pressure measurements are for warm tires right? I assume after driving a bit and not sitting cold overnight in the morning? Sorry for the absolute naive questions.
^^ No, these are always cold pressures, such as sitting overnight. If adjusted to the label recommendation while the tires are warm from driving, then they are actually underinflated.
I just took my Prius in for its 5000 mile service (yike...already!)...anyway, when I got it back, the tires were at 38/36. I had the car at the hangar so I pumped the front tires to 42 PSI topping off using the nitrogen bottle that I had and the rears to 40. BTW, I don't think the Nitrogen makes a difference...but it is what I had...
From what I have heard over the years is that Nitrogen makes for a more constant air pressure, which is why it is used in aircraft and in auto racing. I don't know if that is a true statement, so I'm not looking for an argument. Lots of debate on other threads herein. As long as it doesn't cost extra, I use it. Costco or the local tire dealer will fill my portable tank at no charge, or my tires if I go by the shop.
What is the fundamental difference between using 100% nitrogen and 80% nitrogen (a.k.a "air")? Moisture? The oxygen in the mixture? Not looking for an argument, just curious.
Suppose to be less leakage and less rust formed. As I said, I have no proof. The guy who introduced me to it was involved in racing. Scientific types and engineers on both sides of the discussions here.
For a compromise of mileage vs. ride comfort, I set my tires at 38 front, 35 rear, and I blend, using a special pump device, roughly 4 parts of nitrogen for every 1 part of oxygen.