1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Will going from 195 to 185 result in better fuel economy?

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Fuel Economy' started by Slick 6MT, Sep 14, 2013.

  1. Slick 6MT

    Slick 6MT MPG Master

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    21
    2
    0
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I just did a search with no results so I apologize if this is beating a dead horse.

    I'm about to replace the factory tires after 65,000 miles and I was thinking about downsizing the tire size from 195/65/15 to 185/65/15 on the Michelin Energy Saver A/S. I'm thinking if there is less contact patch then I'll get better fuel economy. Has anyone done this? I realize I'll probably lose some handing but I don't really care because I have a two other fun cars if I want to drive aggressively.

    Thoughts?

    Thanks,
    Anthony
     
  2. Former Member 68813

    Former Member 68813 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    3,524
    981
    8
    Location:
    US
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Good question, but you have to consider load rating. You would have to find 185 tire with load rating of stock 195 tire, and such a tire may not be LRR. I don't know though as I newer checked.
     
  3. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,663
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    What are the revolutions/mile between the tires?

    The reason I ask is on our older, 2003 Prius, I reduced the number of rev/mile by using over-diameter tires:
    • improved steering - the larger diameter tires improved straight-line stability
    • lower transmission losses - turning at slower speed, less stirring
    I'm going to suggest going with just one pair of tires first and trying them on the drive wheels and later on the rear wheels. This will give you a chance to compare-and-contrast their performance.

    In an ideal world, get two extra wheels for the new tires so you'll have six wheels total. You can then conduct the front and rear tests with the option of putting the old pair on do A-B-A testing.

    Remember to measure a calibration factor during your testing. The indicated MPG, speed, and distance are likely to be off . . . significantly. Only by running a calibration test when any of the wheels/tires are changed do you have a chance to understand the effects.

    When done, keep the best tire as a full-size spare and sell the other as "a full size spare." <grins>

    Bob Wilson
     
  4. Slick 6MT

    Slick 6MT MPG Master

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    21
    2
    0
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    See the attached photo to see the differences between the Energy Saver A/S in 195 v. 185. Looks like it should work!
     

    Attached Files:

  5. rdgrimes

    rdgrimes Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    1,740
    446
    4
    Location:
    New Mexico, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    N/A
    Also keep in mind that the "65" refers to 65% of the width. So the 185/65R15 will be both narrower, and shorter (by about 13mm).
     
  6. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk EGR Fanatic

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,675
    39,222
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    The narrowing is good, but the reduction in outside diameter is going to mean the engine rev's a little higher at any given speed. Also your speedometer and odometer will read higher. One (dubious) consolation: the odometer being high will mean the car's (and your) calculation of mpg will be higher.

    That said, it's not a lot of difference.
     
  7. cary1952

    cary1952 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    403
    84
    0
    Location:
    Spearfish, SD
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    I think this is a VERY BAD idea! what, am i the only one to think this? What could you possibly think you are going to gain vs. the cost of this (if it even would work)?
     
  8. Slick 6MT

    Slick 6MT MPG Master

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    21
    2
    0
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II

    Ummm. Money? haha

    If it allows me to get a few more MPG that'll save a bunch of money over the life of the tires. What would be bad about this? I don't follow.
     
  9. Former Member 68813

    Former Member 68813 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    3,524
    981
    8
    Location:
    US
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    No! The stock has 89 load rating, the smaller tire is 86. No honest tire shop will put tires rated lower than stock.
     
  10. cary1952

    cary1952 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    403
    84
    0
    Location:
    Spearfish, SD
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    looks like an accident waiting to happen.
     
  11. rdgrimes

    rdgrimes Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    1,740
    446
    4
    Location:
    New Mexico, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    N/A
    For openers, your odometer and speedometer will be even further off than they are now, so any MPG calculations will be skewed. It'll look better than it is.
     
  12. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,663
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus


    Minor correction:
    The 'transmission' revs will be higher. The engine will still follow the operating line and provide as much power as needed to match the vehicle drag. A subtle difference but real due this being an HSD transmission. Everything else you've pointed out is spot on.

    Bob Wilson
     
    Mendel Leisk likes this.
  13. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,663
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    That is why you bring two wheels and two tires. <GRINS>

    Bob Wilson
     
    F8L likes this.
  14. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I wouldn't do it. I had thought about it but I think the smaller diameter and the extra load on the tires (more flexing) will hurt FE more than help it. It's not a safe way to go either.
     
  15. ursle

    ursle Gas miser

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    1,049
    192
    0
    Location:
    NH
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    My '06 came with 185/65-15, I put 195/65-15's on to correct the speedo, and get better mpg's(195's change the final gear ratio vs 185's and will give better mpg's, just don't start out abruptly)

    Running two different sizes front and rear may set off the stability control gremlins, happened to me, was switching from 185's to 195's and the tech broke a tire, so they put the new ones on the rear (I wanted them on the front, they said they legally couldn't, and put them on the rear, I laughed and left) when I went over 32mph the ice quit, so I limped home and took only the wheels in for new tires, the shop was oblivious to the fact that they could have caused a fatal accident, but very concerned that the new rubber only go on the rear, (just a little off topic;),)
     
  16. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk EGR Fanatic

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,675
    39,222
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    Just thinking:

    Toyota sells the 3rd gen Prius with standard 195/65R15 or optional 215/45R17. The latter's size is pretty close to what the 185/65R15 the OP's considering:

    Prius - 3rd gen - tire size comparison.JPG

    (These numbers are just theoretical, based on stated size. Actual numbers vary a bit.)
     
  17. MPG King

    MPG King New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    3
    0
    0
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    III
    I'm actually thinking about going to 205/65/15s to reduce RPMs, increase handling, and hopefully increase MPGs. I've done this on several vehicles in the past with good results but this is my first prius and I'm still new to the technology. Car has 6K miles on it and last 2 tanks acheived 55 MPG with a mix of road conditions. I might be barking up the wrong tree.
     
  18. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,871
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    In theory, a smaller width tire would be a more aerodynamic tire. This may be negated by Toyota designing around the tire they chose.

    Passenger weight, plus cargo with the stock tires is about 850 pounds with the reduction in load with 185s, it will only be about 400 pounds. 185s make this a dual occupant car, with no cargo.

    185s will alter the odometer and speedometer readings, how will you judge MPG if you can't trust the odometer or speedometer?

    In theory a 185 70 15 tire would be nearly the same circumference as the 195 65 15, yet narrower, but sadly no one makes such a size.
     
  19. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,665
    15,663
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus

    First let's talk about the important metric, "revolutions per mile." This is not constant across any tire aspect and it is the only thing that counts. Now I am four years into this experiment:
    [​IMG]
    What you see are three diameters of Sumitomo T4 tires:
    • 919 rev/mi - the first set, recommended but undersized, they always indicated more speed and distance giving a false indication of good MPG.
    • 886 rev/mi - the second pair, bought to replace two of the first set. The speed and distance were more accurate but on this model, slightly improved handling.
    • 849 rev/mi - the third pair, now on the front for improved handling, the speed and distance show ~6% low. The indicated MPG is 6% low but the actual MPG is as good as what I've seen in the past. I use a GPS for speed and distance measurements or apply a 6% calibration constant.
    Using a larger diameter tire means the transaxle rpm will be lower, reducing rolling drag from stirring losses. However, get one of the test tires to check for clearance and tolerance over speed bumps:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Bob Wilson
     
  20. DaveinOlyWA

    DaveinOlyWA 3rd Time was Solariffic!!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    15,140
    611
    0
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Vehicle:
    2013 Nissan LEAF
    Model:
    Persona
    "generally" speaking, smaller wheels get better gas mileage due to lower torque demands to get the tire spinning. but remember traditional cars have a very narrow RPM band where it performs at best efficiency. lighter tires will do it and a somewhat higher revolutions per mile I am guessing wont be significant.

    in the old days, economy cars came with 13' wheels due to poorer performing engines with low HP. this provided an acceptable level of acceleration while increasing performance.

    keep in mind changing this will increase the inaccuracy of your speedometer