1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

My new tinted taillights and emblems...

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Accessories & Modifications' started by treehggr, Aug 14, 2007.

  1. ststvn9

    ststvn9 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    11
    0
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    In almost all states, if rear ended, it is the fault of the driver stricking the other vehicle in the rear end. An insurer cannot deny coverage for this type of scenario, ragrdless of brake lights. Additionally, if you have comprehensive collision coverage, which most lenders require if you do not own your vehicle outright it doesn;t matter who is at fault. In situations involving an accident where the other driver was negligent then their insurance will pay for the cost so long as they have insurance, if they don't and you do then your insurer will provide um/uim coverage that applies to those situations where the negligent driver is not insured or is underinsured.;)
     
  2. ststvn9

    ststvn9 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    11
    0
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    In almost all states, if rear ended, it is the fault of the driver stricking the other vehicle in the rear end. An insurer cannot deny coverage for this type of scenario, ragrdless of brake lights. Additionally, if you have comprehensive collision coverage, which most lenders require if you do not own your vehicle outright it doesn;t matter who is at fault. In situations involving an accident where the other driver was negligent then their insurance will pay for the cost so long as they have insurance, if they don't and you do then your insurer will provide um/uim coverage that applies to those situations where the negligent driver is not insured or is underinsured.;)
     
  3. SparrowHawk60

    SparrowHawk60 Happy to be green!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    411
    0
    0
    Location:
    Town of Newburgh, NY, U.S.of A.
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    I was thinking along the same lines. Why not take these to a chrome shop and have them de-chromed?
    (They can use a reverse process to electrically remove the chrome.)
    Or how about using a Dremel tool with sanding discs to take off the chrome?
     
  4. Steamboatsig

    Steamboatsig Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    337
    20
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    So you're saying if I decide to disconnect my brake lights, drive the flow of traffic on the freeway, and then do a full panic stop, the driver that hit me would still be at fault? I think not.
     
  5. mrblaise

    mrblaise Go Lakers!!

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    2,248
    525
    19
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    If you intentionally disconnected your lights there may be some comparative negligence on your part. The driver who struck you would still share the lion's part of the liability however.

     
  6. Danny Hamilton

    Danny Hamilton Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    926
    94
    0
    Location:
    Greater Chicagoland Area
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I'm not certain, but I thought I read somewhere that in most jurisdictions in the U.S. it is illegal to have red lights in the front of the car. It would be fun, but might get you a few traffic citations.
     
  7. Steamboatsig

    Steamboatsig Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    337
    20
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    He said, the insurance would pay regardless of the brake lights. I was making one example.
     
  8. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    466
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    the light filament will tell you whether the bulb was on at the time the accident occurred- the other driver's lie about the lights not being on would not stand up to an accident investigator.

    when we were considering tinting our taillights, DH just tacked a sample of the tint (our tint guy rules) on to the tail light and drove to the other end of the massive parking lot where we lived at the time. i could see the tail lights just fine from several hundred ft, and the brakes were of course easily visible as well.

    as long as your car meets the limits of the law, it should not be an issue for the insurance companies either in case of an accident. for the record, we did not tint our lights because we preferred to use the money for other things.
     
  9. SparrowHawk60

    SparrowHawk60 Happy to be green!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    411
    0
    0
    Location:
    Town of Newburgh, NY, U.S.of A.
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    True to a point. The driver(s) behind you are to keep a reasonable distance and be in control of their car. This means being able to notice you stopping. The brake light 'malfunction' would come into play when Law Enforcement gets involved.
    Your getting hit in the rear is often a result of chargeable violations of the V+T laws, IE following to closely, failure to yield, inattentive driving- cell phone use.... Thus putting blame on the drive who strikes your car.
    It can be disputed, IE brake light malfunction, which includes the lights being out. (However no "third eye" while the other brake lights are operational has not been a justifiable defense, in a few cases I've dealt with.)
     
  10. SparrowHawk60

    SparrowHawk60 Happy to be green!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    411
    0
    0
    Location:
    Town of Newburgh, NY, U.S.of A.
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius

    Illegal, no. (Fine is less than $1000) A violation of V+T laws, yes.
    It becomes illegal when this light is used to move through traffic or have traffic yield the right of way.
    (Obstruction of Government Administration, Could also be Criminal Impersonation if an other crime is involved.)
    Yes, you're right. This is because this color is reserved for Fire Departments and Volunteer Firemen (Offical Fire department vehicle ie; Chief's car, Asst. Chief's car.)

    New York State V+T law in summary:
    § 375 (41). Colored and flashing lights.
    "2. Red lights and certain [​IMG]. One or more red or combination red and white lights, or one white light which must be a revolving, rotating, flashing, oscillating or constantly moving light, may be affixed to an authorized emergency vehicle, and such lights may be displayed on an authorized emergency vehicle when such vehicle is engaged in an emergency operation, and upon a fire vehicle while returning from an alarm of fire or other emergency."

    FOG lights were illegal in New York up untill a few years ago. It was sledom enforced, but the only Vehicle that was allowed other than standard forward white lights was a snow plow! (No, yellow lights didn't cut it either.)
     
  11. rpiereck

    rpiereck Regenerator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    289
    3
    0
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius

    You did not quote the whole section of the vehicle code, not just part of the section. If you read the heading of section 24600 you will see it mentions during hours of darkness, so those tinted taillights might be legal if they can be seen from 1,000 feet away:

    24600. During darkness every motor vehicle which is not in
    combination with any other vehicle and every vehicle at the end of a
    combination of vehicles shall be equipped with lighted taillamps
    mounted on the rear as follows:
    (a) Every vehicle shall be equipped with one or more taillamps.
    (b) Every vehicle, other than a motorcycle, manufactured and first
    registered on or after January 1, 1958, shall be equipped with not
    less than two taillamps, except that trailers and semitrailers
    manufactured after July 23, 1973, which are less than 30 inches wide,
    may be equipped with one taillamp which shall be mounted at or near
    the vertical centerline of the vehicles. If a vehicle is equipped
    with two taillamps, they shall be mounted as specified in subdivision
    (d).
    (c) Every vehicle or vehicle at the end of a combination of
    vehicles, subject to subdivision (a) of Section 22406 shall be
    equipped with not less than two taillamps.
    (d) When two taillamps are required, at least one shall be mounted
    at the left and one at the right side respectively at the same
    level.
    (e) Taillamps shall be red in color and shall be plainly visible
    from all distances within 500 feet to the rear except that taillamps
    on vehicles manufactured after January 1, 1969, shall be plainly
    visible from all distances within 1,000 feet to the rear.
    (f) Taillamps on vehicles manufactured on or after January 1,
    1969, shall be mounted not lower than 15 inches nor higher than 72
    inches, except that a tow truck, in addition to being equipped with
    the required taillamps, may also be equipped with two taillamps which
    may be mounted not lower than 15 inches nor higher than the maximum
    allowable vehicle height and as far forward as the rearmost portion
    of the driver's seat in the rearmost position. The additional
    taillamps on a tow truck shall be lighted whenever the headlamps are
    lighted.
     
  12. exbauer

    exbauer Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    1,185
    101
    0
    Location:
    Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    are you going to tint the rear center stop light? i think that would really make the rear end complete.
     
  13. ststvn9

    ststvn9 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    11
    0
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Good luck proving the taillights didn't work when the rear end of your car is destroyed. I believe someone else mentioned that if you intentionally disconnect the brake lights then you have another problem i.e. some states recognize i.e contributory negligence. However, if you have collision your insurer will repair regardless of fault so long as you didn't intentionally cause the accident. If it was intentional on your part the policy would be void under the intentional acts provision of your policy of insurance.
     
  14. Steamboatsig

    Steamboatsig Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    337
    20
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Look, I like the tinted tail light look.

    My point is tinting your tail lights is an intentional act of obscurring the light that is emitted by the bulbs. It could leave you open for litigation. That's all.
     
  15. Danny Hamilton

    Danny Hamilton Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    926
    94
    0
    Location:
    Greater Chicagoland Area
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I'm missing something here.

    According to Merriam-Webster,
    illegal: not according to or authorized by law

    So, if it is a violation of laws, then it is not permissible according those laws. If it is not permissible according to law, then it is not authorized by law. So how is it not illegal?
     
  16. SparrowHawk60

    SparrowHawk60 Happy to be green!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    411
    0
    0
    Location:
    Town of Newburgh, NY, U.S.of A.
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    True, I'm talking about the difference between a felony a misdemeanor and a violation of the law.

    In this case tinting the rear lights would be a violation of the law, the fine would be under $500 (an example, more than likely a "FIX" ticket would be issued or the fine would be less) (per Violation, hence two lights= $1000) and jail time (if any) would be under 15 days. -V+T fines can be compounded and not increase a violation to a misdemeanor, unless specified under the law, ie DWI.-

    Misdemeanor fine over $1000, jail time over 15 days.

    Felony fine over $5000, jail time of more than 60 days.

    Rough guidelines but that's normally where the cut offs begin.

    So while it is illegal to tint your lights, it is only a violation of the law.
    I miss spoke, sorry for the confusion I may have caused.
     
  17. chrisspaulding

    chrisspaulding sexy, high tech, fun

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    556
    24
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Looks great!
    I've already e-mailed the tint shop for a quote.


    QUESTION ON THE EMBLEMS:

    Why:
    Remove the chrome?

    Why not:
    Clean with denatured alcohol
    Spray with adhesion promoter
    Spray with chrome paint (3 coats)
    Finish with clear coat
    .
     
  18. ZC1

    ZC1 Junior Prius Owner

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    711
    13
    0
    Location:
    Metro Detroit
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    It's like the question "Why scale Mt. Everest?",
    Answer:
    Because it's there.

    Besides, chrome anybody can do, It's cheap looking and cheap.
    Now polished aluminum is not cheap and looks alot better.

    Although in this case, I'm blacking out my emblems to match my White on Black (or is it Black on White?) color scheme.

    ZC1
     
  19. chrisspaulding

    chrisspaulding sexy, high tech, fun

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    556
    24
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    what I meant was, in the interest of blacking out the emblems (because I'm going to black mine out tomorrow), why sand the chrome off?
    Can't I just apply black paint over the chrome using the following process?


    Clean with denatured alcohol
    Spray with adhesion promoter
    Spray with black paint for chrome surface (3 coats)
    Finish with clear coat

    result = black emblem without having to sand the chrome off first.
    .
     
  20. ZC1

    ZC1 Junior Prius Owner

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    711
    13
    0
    Location:
    Metro Detroit
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Chris,

    I stand corrected. I misread your question.

    I agree with you, although in the interest of laziness I'm simply spraypainting mine with black caliper paint. It has several coats now and after a few more days of drying, I will clear coat it a few times.

    Under normal circumstances, I'm thinking the emblems should stay black without chipping.

    ZC1