1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Difference between displayed and actual MPG

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Fuel Economy' started by Vman455, Oct 2, 2020.

  1. Vman455

    Vman455 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    534
    552
    13
    Location:
    The Middle
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Ever since I bought my Prius, nearly 7 years ago now, I've tracked the fuel consumption on Ecomodder, which calculates actual MPG from gallons replaced and distance driven. I have also recorded the displayed MPG for each tank. At just over 90,000 miles, that means 178 tanks with calculated and displayed MPG data.

    I put it all in an Excel spreadsheet and calculated mean, median, quartiles, and outliers for actual difference and percent difference for each tank. The outliers were few; 2 low values when the display showed less MPG than actual, an artifact of the reality that gas pumps are not 100% consistent. That left 176 "good" values for each statistic.

    The results:

    [​IMG]

    Mean = 3.04 MPG difference
    Min = 0.9 MPG difference
    Max = 5.3 MPG difference
    Median = 3.0 MPG difference

    [​IMG]

    Mean = 5.563% difference
    Min = 1.44% difference
    Max = 10.23% difference
    Median = 5.58% difference

    So, on my car at least the display averages +3.0 MPG high, or 5.6%.
     
    DimitrisTS and Pluggo like this.
  2. Kenny94945

    Kenny94945 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2016
    814
    406
    0
    Location:
    Sausalito
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Four
    Wow.
    Awesome data.
    7 yrs, 90K mile, 178 fill ups.

    If I understand correctly, the conclusion:
    Dash display if 5.58% higher than actual.
    Actual miles vs dash is 3.0 mpg lower.

    Just awesome.
    Thank you.
     
  3. Vman455

    Vman455 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    534
    552
    13
    Location:
    The Middle
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Yep, exactly.

    If anyone else has kept track of this, I'm curious what sort of consistency we would see e.g. if ~5.5% difference is typical. I see people post frequently with a number they think represents the difference in their experience, but I'm not sure anyone has actually calculated it.
     
  4. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Book Cover Judge

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,845
    39,313
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    My error, pretty much from day one, is 7.21%
     
  5. FastForwardRay

    FastForwardRay New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2020
    3
    0
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four Touring
    This is great. I have not kept track of the difference but I always noticed a difference between what I calculated and what was displayed.

    I figured that the gas pump makes a difference, and there was some error in the software.

    I typically see 3-4 mpg difference.

    The difference is low when I have idled a lot. Maybe fuel usage measurements have an error at higher flow.
     
  6. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Book Cover Judge

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,845
    39,313
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    If Toyota was a butcher they'd have a thumb on the scale. :rolleyes:
     
  7. 9watts

    9watts New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2024
    19
    3
    0
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    Well here I am on my very first full-tank-under-my-control on a new to me 2014 Prius V and I got exactly what you are seeing: 5.9% discrepancy, 46.9mpg (calculated by Prius computer) vs 44.3mpg (calculated by me) on a 370 mile tank using 8.33 gallons of regular on 35PSI tires. I want to add more air next.
    Not impressed with Toyota for never apparently seeing fit to tweak their algorithms by, say, 5% to bring these two into closer alignment. But impressed with you Vman455 for doing such excellent work for the benefit of this group. Thank you!
     
  8. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Book Cover Judge

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,845
    39,313
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    The discrepancy likely is by design.
     
  9. 9watts

    9watts New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2024
    19
    3
    0
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    Well I’m sure it isn’t accidental, or unknown, but what exactly do you mean by design?
     
  10. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Book Cover Judge

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,845
    39,313
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    The car knows more accurately, but adds a 5~9% “improvement”.
     
  11. ASRDogman

    ASRDogman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2018
    6,509
    3,435
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Calculated, and actually, are always different. Every manufacture does this.
    99% of the cars will not get what they say it will get. They use a test track. They drive
    slower and more carefully to get the maximum amount.
    I don't know if they include wind resistant or not. Or drafting. It's likely an "average" of
    speed driving and amount of fuel being used(calculated) to come up with an average.

    My real mpg is 1-1.5 lower MOST of the time. For me, close enough is good enough.
     
  12. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Book Cover Judge

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,845
    39,313
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    From reports here they seem to have curtailed the mpg exaggeration with 5th Gen Prius (2023+).
     
  13. 9watts

    9watts New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2024
    19
    3
    0
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    This is the part that I find baffling.
    Toyota knows its customers. We (fuel efficiency nerds) are a recognized demographic among its Prius customers. We know how to calculate real world fuel economy. And of course notice (and are peeved by) this discrepancy. So why not throw us a bone, fix the discrepancy, own the matter?
    As for the rest of its customers who we may imagine care less about fuel economy, may not themselves calculate it manually, well lying to them, making as if their fuel economy were 6% higher than it is serves no purpose that I can understand, except to increase cynicism, undermine their integrity as a player in this world.
     
    Mendel Leisk likes this.
  14. 9watts

    9watts New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2024
    19
    3
    0
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    That is very interesting, though not clear to me why it would take them most of 25 years to fix that error.
     
    Mendel Leisk likes this.
  15. 9watts

    9watts New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2024
    19
    3
    0
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    I think you are talking about something else. Maybe the EPA test cycle?
    This topic is about an observed and consistent discrepancy between the car’s fuel economy computer that calculates a mpg figure based on your/our driving that is as folks here have confirmed off by about 6% from what we can all easily calculate by hand by dividing fuel purchased at the gas station and miles driven.
     
  16. ASRDogman

    ASRDogman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2018
    6,509
    3,435
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    epa was not mentioned. I am typing about the difference between calculated mpg
    and actual mpg. I have no idea how you came to that decision since I did mention fuel.

    And this is NOT a discrepancy or an error. I have no idea why you would think that.
    There is a +/- for that "guess". Filling up at different pumps will give you different fuel amounts.
    Each handle is different. You would have to fill up at the same pump at the same time of day
    under the exact same temps and humidity to get an exact reading.
    There are too many variables.
    It's not a big deal either. I never trust what the computer says I'm getting.
    I always calculate it myself.

    Several times I get more mpg than what the display says. But the next time I fill, it's a lot lower.
    Which tells me that handle cut off too soon. Or the other too late.

    You can likely adjust that reading if you have techstream or similar gear.
    Same with the speedometer. My actual mph is 1mph lower than what the speedometer says.
     
  17. 9watts

    9watts New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2024
    19
    3
    0
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    you didn’t mention EPA but you mentioned test track and wind resistance and manufacturer.
    If you read the first post in this topic the masterful work he did to generate those data already deal with the variability you just mentioned.
    We are at this point most certainly talking past each other.
     
  18. BiomedO1

    BiomedO1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2021
    1,930
    966
    0
    Location:
    SacTown, Ca
    Vehicle:
    2021 Prius Prime
    Model:
    LE
    A lot of us do track actual mpg. I use my trip-A for fill-ups, and trip-B for maintenance. A lot of the variations are related to your ability to fill the tank up to the same point in the gas filler neck. That's at least a gallon of variation.
    This also doesn't take into account the odometer/speedometer is usually fast by 2-3 mph based on GPS data; but we work with the data that's available.
    LoL, you need to find another butcher.:eek::LOL::D:ROFLMAO::sleep:

    @9watts, Toyota sells millions of cars a year, so a hundred complaints don't even register. Regulatory is focused on safety, so if the gauges are within a statistical normal, it gets a pass. That doesn't even take into account that it makes them look better, in the eyes of the EPA. I remember my statics teacher telling me that, There are liars, damm liars, and then there are statisticians. :LOL::ROFLMAO::sleep:

    Enjoy....
     
    #18 BiomedO1, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:14 AM
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2024 at 11:57 AM
    ASRDogman likes this.
  19. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Book Cover Judge

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    56,845
    39,313
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    Do you mean if the error falls on either side of accurate? I've been tracking mpg virtually since a few months after getting our 2010 (in 2010), both with a spreadsheet and Fuely, and the dash display has always been off, anywhere from maybe 3 to 9 percent, and guess which side. I would blame the variation in error on pumping vagaries.

    In my spreadsheet I note the displayed mpg (well kms liters per 100 km), calc the discrepancy tank-by-tank, and the average error. Which comes in around 7%.

    upload_2024-11-25_8-54-16.png

    You may want to proofread that. ;)
     
    #19 Mendel Leisk, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:40 AM
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2024 at 11:54 AM
  20. BiomedO1

    BiomedO1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2021
    1,930
    966
    0
    Location:
    SacTown, Ca
    Vehicle:
    2021 Prius Prime
    Model:
    LE
    Yes,, I set my cruise control @ 70 mph across the flat valley floor and my GPS is bouncing between 67mph & 68 mph. It is repeatable on a straight line for about 10 miles. Hilly sections with twist and turns would introduce more variations = less reliable data.