1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Which $7,500 is better?

Discussion in 'EV (Electric Vehicle) Discussion' started by bwilson4web, Apr 18, 2023.

?

Which price decrease is most desirable?

Poll closed May 18, 2023.
  1. $7,500 - Federal subsidy both car and battery

    50.0%
  2. $7,500 - Federal subsidy for car and LiFePO battery cost reduction

    25.0%
  3. I won't buy an EV

    25.0%
  1. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    LiFePO batteries are less expensive than NMC batteries. But battery material source is about 50% of the Federal discount. So which would you prefer and why?

    I prefer price reductions by changing to a cheaper battery because the battery savings can be applied world wide. So it works for Canadian, Latin America, Europe, Asian, and African buyers. Equally important is a political decision on subsidies can be reversed by a single election. Taking that tool away from the politicians is like taking guns away from the foolish ... a good idea.

    Bob Wilson
     
  2. John321

    John321 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2018
    1,285
    1,274
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    I would prefer a straightforward well though out and managed rebated system rather than anything connected with tax liabilities which in effect limits who can access the incentives.

    A system much like how utilities do the Heat Pump Hot Water rebate. - buy the Heat Pump - submit the paperwork on its efficiency rating with the sales receipt - they send you the rebate incentive check.

    As we are finding out with the discussions - the exceptions, implementation dates, income qualifications, tax liabilities, income tax forms, necessary tax liabilities, manufacturing qualifications, tracking, loopholes, Federal Bureaucracy ineptitude and general Government political involvement almost make the Federal Incentives a non starter.

    I still remember what I had to go through to generate a Federal Tax Liability when I bought our PHEV to claim the Federal Tax Incentive - just nonsense. Many retired people who no longer work will not have a current tax liability even though they have paid substantial taxes over the years. There are many similar situations.
     
    #2 John321, Apr 18, 2023
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2023
    bwilson4web likes this.
  3. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I like the idea of submitting proof of purchase or copy of registration and getting a rebate check ... no questions asked. But I would prefer a well documented, universally applied, expiration to the subsidy program. A long subsidy rewards the stupid and inefficient.

    More important, I would like to see a charging subsidy for homes, apartments, and employers. Given the backlog of need, a longer and generous installation cost. Also, encouragement for time-of-day billing to promote a more constant load on the grid. It should support whatever plugs are being sold such as dual, CCS-1 and Tesla. CHAdeMO is negotiable but should be in proportion to the population. Finally, tailored to support maintenance (aka., if you've ever used a public restroom, you know what I mean.)

    Bob Wilson
     
  4. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    22,447
    11,760
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Pretty sure there is a charging subsidy back in place.

    The original subsidy in Japan for EVs and hybrids was a direct one to the manufacturer for each sale. With the independent dealer model in the US, it may not work. Rebates would open up the incentive to more of the population, but aren't pain free to implement. The state rebate I got for the Prius counted as income on that year's federal taxes for instance.

    A cost reduction from tech or material improvement will get applied regardless of government incentive. As long as those incentives are tech neutral. LFP doesn't work for all applications. There is also potential issues with a globally used product that's production is limited to one country.
     
  5. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    110,129
    50,045
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    i think the biden has done a reasonable job thinking this all through
     
  6. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,340
    3,596
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Re: survey...I am not in market for EV, but PHEV is a poss
     
  7. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    22,447
    11,760
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Are PHEVs excluding from the current incentive?
     
  8. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,660
    15,661
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    The top $7500: Credits for New Clean Vehicles Purchased in 2023 or After | Internal Revenue Service

    Source_2: https://fueleconomy.gov/feg/tax2023.shtml

    Federal Tax Credits for Plug-in Electric and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles Purchased in 2023 or After
    (Vehicle placed into service on or after after April 18, 2023)

    Code:
    Make    Model    Credit Amount    MSRP Limit[/B][/B]
    [B]Cadillac  LYRIQ         $7,500    $80,000
    Chevrolet Blazer.       $7,500    $80,000
    Chevrolet Bolt.         $7,500    $55,000
    Chevrolet Bolt EUV.     $7,500    $55,000
    Chevrolet Equinox       $7,500    $80,000
    Chevrolet Silverado     $7,500    $80,000
    
    Chrysler Pacifica       $7,500    $80,000
    
    Ford F150               $7,500    $80,000
    Ford F150_Standard      $7,500    $80,000
    
    Lincoln Aviator         $7,500    $80,000
    
    Tesla Model 3 Perf      $7,500    $55,000
    Tesla Model Y           $7,500    $80,000
    Tesla Model Y Long      $7,500    $80,000
    Tesla Model Y Perf      $7,500    $80,000[/B][/FONT]

    Source: Internal Revenue Service
     
    #8 bwilson4web, Apr 18, 2023
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2023
  9. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    22,447
    11,760
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    The Escape, Corsair, and Jeep 4xe PHEVs also qualify for the $3750 credit.

    I remember there being a minimum battery capacity to the credit that might disqualify a PHEV, though that could have been from earlier versions of the bill.