How long have you been using 0W-40? Maybe, but it seems Gen III has more complaints! That's why we have 0W-30 and 0W-40 oils.......for negative forty weather.
Yeah but why do we need that thicker oil at operating temperature (SAE 30 or 40)? What's the idea behind that versus using the thinner 20? Is it because at the end of the oil interval, it becomes too thin when using 0W20?
It may be that 20 weight oil is just to thin. Some 30 weight oils are close to a 20 weight and some 40 weight oils are close to a 30 weight. European oils tend to be thicker and closer to a true 30 weight and 40 weight.
Umm .... They're "true" if they're within the allowed range of viscosity for their claimed grade, whether they're near the maximum, near the minimum, or right in the middle. That said, you're correct that the European flavors tend not to flirt with the minimums, as "fuel economy" oils often do.
I'm still waiting for the post that says "so you think you know more than the engineers who designed the car?".
it all funnels down to the criteria the engineers went by/ if it was to meet mpg/co2 emission requirements in the usa & an acceptable engine mileage (like 180.000 miles), they were dead on to recommend 0w-20/
That's just it David, the engineers don't have a free rein, I suspect they're pushed by various influences and restraints. How else to explain the variety of oil change intervals, and grades, around the world. Also: dead silence on the subject of transaxle fluid change?
I know nothing. And the engineers are just puppets...? Let's just use whatever oil we feel like using. We will STILL get somewhere between 45 and 70 MPG!
Engineers don't have the last call on designing cars. Governmental agency's, Marketing, Legal Teams and Boards of Directors have much more influence on how a car is designed and how long it's to last. You can't really believe if an auto company wanted to build a car to last a lifetime, they could not do it in 2016? We saw a perfect example with the new GEN IV, it was almost ready to be unveiled to the world, and the Executives at Toyota pulled the plug on the original design and they designers had to make changes. Who knows if this was the smart thing to do, with the slower then expected sales of the new Gen IV.
Probably. If you look for the spyshots of the first mule, it looks very similar to a Gen 3. The second round of spyshots (the ones from Thailand, Belgium and SF), well we obviously know what that looks like but just compare the camouflaged one to the 1st mule. It's quite different.
This oil situation is pretty confusing. Seems like a lot of politics involved in the design of the car. I would like to use what the owner's manual recommends, but now I'm not so sure. And now I see that thread about oil leaks in a 2013 Prius. Bad seals/gaskets? Could using a thicker oil minimize those leaks, or prevented the leaks?
In addition to politics there is also profits that have a great factor ( sometimes overriding). As someone who worked for a supplier of Toyota, when we had something new or innovative to offer, do you think they gave immediate approval? They used the 3 factors that we are all familiar with when making a financial decision: 1) is it less expensive than what I currently buy 2) is it something that is a better value at the same price 3) is it something I am willing to pay more for that offers me some advantage You can imagine which of the 3 above was least chosen
My opinion: go by the recommendations in the owner's manual and stop worrying. There are millions of 2ZR-FXE-engined Priuses on the roads; the few people who post here with oil consumption problems or gasket leaks are not a representative sample. Even "trustworthy" sources such as Consumer Reports, who conduct random sampling, do so from the pool of people who already subscribe to CR--which means their data can't be reliably extrapolated to American owners as a whole (CR subscribers may be more likely to notice minor problems like oil consumption, for instance, or more likely to buy certain models of vehicle recommended by CR, or any number of other variables which cannot be controlled). It's even worse on a website like this, where people could sign up because their car is burning oil or has an oil leak, thus making this seem like a bigger problem (i.e. likelier to happen to you) than it actually is.
The words if the service manager are still ringing in my ears... "All Toyota engines leak oil! I wouldn't have a job if they didn't!" I wonder if that guy got fired?
Yes. Toyota gives specs for the oil, but never insists on synth. that said, in 0w20 I think they all are synth?
I am not really sure if all 0W-20 are fully synthetic. For example, Liqui Moly 0W-20 Special Tec AA 0W-20 just says it is "Special Tec" and "High Tech Synthese Technology", both I guess are their proprietary or marketing terms. On the other hand, Mobil 1 mentions their 0W-20 is Fully Synthetic on the label. I have found similarities in some other brands too. If it is fully synthetic, shouldn't the manufacturer mention it since it is more expensive to produce?