ABS Module part number?

Gen 3 ABS ECU is-integrated-with the brake actuator is-integrated-with the master cylinder, so pretty much all your answers were right. Try 47050-47140.

If I remember right, these used to be quite a bit saltier. Maybe I'm imagining it.

 

pretzels?

 

i'm not either

 

Well, so it's like this. There was an old unit, catalog number 47050-47060. Toyota doesn't sell that one anymore. It's been superseded by 47050-47140.



The old part, with the catalog number 47050-47060, also had a "mark", 47210-47140 (see the bottom of that pasted image). I've never completely understood why car parts often have a number marked on the part that looks just like a catalog number but is different. I first ran into that with Ford. Walk in with a piece in my hand and say "see, this number right here" and the poor guy at the counter would have to try to look it up 'cause that wasn't the part number.

Unsurprisingly, when recyclers pull used parts out of cars and list them on the web, they will often be reading the "mark" off the part, instead of finding the right part number.

The newer, superseding part, 47050-47140, also has a "mark", 47210-47310.

I was surprised to see Toyota listing the thing for $710 dealer suggested list, because it wasn't long ago PriusChat was filled with posts about how it was $1600–$1700, or $2500, or $3500 Canadian.

I notice lots of internet sellers throw the word "pump" into the description of this part. Don't be fooled; in Gen 3, the pump and accumulator are in a separate assembly, not part of this one.

 

Toyota’s production and service part numbers use the same format, so I expect it’s a production part number for one of the components of the assembly, or for the assembly without the ECU firmware.

I agree with Frank Watts, author of Engineering Documentation Control Handbook (see “Item Marking,” 4th ed., p. 69): marking any number on parts is wasteful and leads to just this kind of confusion.

 

Hard to say. I would assume they updated the part for a reason, but I have no inside information.

I'm thinking that might be regarded as a stretch....

They're both somewhat expensive and somewhat exhausting to replace, so any time I could find a way to pinpoint which one was the source of a problem I was having, I would probably not rush to change the other one just because.

Depends, of course, on how confident you are in the pinpointing.

 

Looking at how the price has come down, I'm seriously thinking that if I ever turn out to need one, I might just buy new, and avoid wondering about whether a used one has an exciting past, or about what kind of trained primate performed its removal from the donor car. (Toyota has TSBs giving very stringent handling instructions, including no cloth/fabric gloves or rags, anything that could shed tiny textile fibers that could get into the valves. As far as salvage-yard disassembly operations following those instructions, I have a level of confidence somewhere near zero.)

 

I understand.

Under the circumstances, the best you can do is to make sure you follow the handling instructions as carefully as possible while unpacking and installing it.

 

Compared to those things it's considerably more of a job, and with safety implications. Going to a shop is probably the right call, if you trust the shop.

 

The thing looks like some bit of the plastic under covers; you'll probably be able to figure out which bit at your leisure by looking at the parts diagrams, or at the other side of the car for comparison.

Of more concern is the dash light. What are the trouble codes?

 

HEY MAN HOW DID IT GO DID YOU INSTALL IT BY YOURSELF? DOES IT NEED REPROGRAMMING AFTERWARDS? I NEED HELP I BUYING USED PART WHAT WAS THE PART NUMBER U BOUGHT AND WHAT WAS YOUR OWN PART NUMBER